all 6 comments

[–]Site_rly_sux 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I seriously doubt you have tried every one out there. Actually in the time you took to type this you could have spooled up any of the SD checkpoints on this huge list

https://github.com/camenduru/stable-diffusion-webui-colab

I put $10 on colab months and months ago, and I have only used a few bucks of it, even after hosting and sharing around a stable diffusion instance for a long time. So it's as good as free

They never can show what is typed despite using the clearest and most succinct language.

It's worth checking whether you're doing the prompts correctly. Watch some artists on youtube to see how they use prompts.

"Painting of cats playing chess" might not work as well as "museum painting, paintbrush texture, pre raphaelite, cats playing chess, hd photo, raw photo, 8k hd" or whatever

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    I'm not doing more than a prompt on a web page

    Okay but if you're using someone else's expensive gfx cards, then why is it weird that they don't want gore or porn. Think about it. If you spent $50k on exposing graphics cards to the internet, would you want them used for someone's gore.

    Apparently the services you're using - no, they don't want you making gore. So host your own, or find another.

    I'm most concerned with yet doesn't work. I use simple equivalent language, and all I get is a collage of crap

    Okay then you're doing it wrong.

    You're supposed to put in text that matches the labels for the training imagery.

    If some random internet publisher, posts online a photo of cats playing chess, and that photo ends up in the stable diffusion training set - then you as the SD prompt typist, need to type something similar to what the random publisher would have typed. And they typically aren't using "simple equivalent language".

    I would suggest you take a few minutes to learn how the technology works, instead of assuming you already know it, and blunder around doing it wrong

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Okay so everyone else, thousands and thousands of people, use it just fine, but it's vaporware because you didn't spent five minutes figuring it out. Okay bro

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Once again you're living up to your username.

        If you use a1111 webui, the rng seed is a field you can edit directly. If you find a picture you like, you can make small edits with the same seed number and it 'just works'.

        So it's not spinning the wheel. You can use ControlNet, re-use a seed number, and inpaint/outpaint.... it's as fine control as if you were holding a pen.

        Thousands of people are already using it in the way you're describing.

        The fact that you haven't spent five minutes figuring it out - is a failure with you, not the engineering

        [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        if you want to make your pedo torture porn, you're going to have to host your own instance, sorry

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Dall-E-2 is quite a bit better than the last gen stuff you can use for free