top 100 commentsshow all 116

[–][deleted] 28 insightful - 7 fun28 insightful - 6 fun29 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

saiditter for 6 minutes

[–]Optimus85 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. Fuck those people.

[–]zyxzevn 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

People come in here waves. The Voat wave is passing away.

I expect soon the wave when reddit starts banning subs about covid.

Information that I find interesting is more concentrated on certain subs. Usually they are also more controversial (compared to reddit)

Like:
/s/coronavirus
/s/vaccineSkepticism
/s/ClimateSkeptics
/s/NoNewNormal
/s/CorruptScience

In the mean time I build up a database of articles (and videos) that I find very interesting/informative.
That way the site becomes Quality over Quantity. I think that this site was intended for that purpose.

But quality posts do not get you many internet points. And that is what I think is wrong with this site's ranking system. Often important posts are buried, while unimportant news and jokes usually get on top.

I like to post interesting science on:
/s/Physics
/s/Biology
/s/Mathematics

I suggest everyone to add some quality articles to the site as well.

[–]TheAmeliaManiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I agree. Not many people click the light icon on interesting posts, and instead laugh at those of us who try the hardest to make this place better.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But that "laugh" button is good-natured. It represents the FUN element of SaidIt, which has no negative ratings for topics.

[–]Akali 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem is the home page is popular by default instead of new. People are lazy, me included. Why clicking on new if there's new stuff in popular?

[–]Jesus-Christ 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I lack the intelligence for all three of those subforums, rip

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 14 fun8 insightful - 13 fun9 insightful - 14 fun -  (45 children)

I was told I get a free dinner coupon if I sit through a presentation...

[–]oooooooooooooooooooo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (40 children)

the problem with sites like these forums is that there are too many topics, there are too many videos about too many random topics... there are too many chiefs and not enough indians..

if somebody could figure out how to eliminate the "moderators", and create a system whereby the "indians" could collectively decide what the topics are to be discussed, you would have a winner.

a system that does that will attract users from around the world.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

That's interesting, the usual complaint is that all of these sites just have politics posts.

[–]specialsauces 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

i hang out on these forums, i am not sure why, they really have no value, period... i would be here if i were chatting bots.. i am that bored... i would sit here and chat with paid shills... i am that bored..

if someone wants to make a forum, you have to know how to get rid of the bots and the shills.

yes, they do exist.

in fact, they exists a lot lot lot.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Let me know if you find or come up with a decent site. Aside from almost no possibility of that happening with the current iteration of the human species, the problem of how to get paid and cover costs is way up there.

Now that the owners and operators of the internet are becoming increasingly enthusiastic about censoring off-narrative information, users, and sites, the days of sites with legitimate interaction are numbered.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

number one, as far as getting paid goes, i wouldnt use any of the mainstream payment gateways.. instead i would use bitcoin..

bitcoin is going to go thru the roof soon, just watch.. people are becoming afraid of dollars..

i like the idea of running a site on the darkweb... i realize that sounds scary to newbies, but it isnt... you just download tor and then you have to understand that the domain names look a bit weird compared to regular domain names..

i have already setup my basic onion system, i dont have to pay for hosting, i dont have to pay for a domain name.. i do have to pay for my bandwidth for serving up html.. but as far as showing videos that are hosted on youtube or other video streaming services, that doesnt use my bandwidth.. and hey, i am an old school programmer, i wont bloat up my site with massive javascript like fkng parler does.. have you ever seen how parler loads when you first visit http://parler.com ? wtf? that loadup process is entirely not necessary.. it is, i think, loading up a shitton of javascript.

i am serving up this following dot onion page from a $200 windows laptop that is using my android's hotspot for connectivity.

if i can just get my shit organized, you wont believe how simplified i will make it..

http://cjew3ixkcpf7ez6mmy7hro5ezdphdznertlz6ugu5kjrqu2z4y6jsiid.onion

(you need to download TOR from http://torproject.org to visit dot onion url's)

speaking of getting my shit organized, where is miss amelia may?

[–]Node 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

http://cjew3ixkcpf7ez6mmy7hro5ezdphdznertlz6ugu5kjrqu2z4y6jsiid.onion

Is that supposed to all be under construction? Thanks for the Tor link, btw. Haven't used that for years.

As for parler, I auto block cookies and frame on every new site with uMatrix, and only allow the remaining elements from 1st party sites to load. Looks like they have about 10 scripts they load right away.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

i seem to remember offering my hand to assist in securing down this forum, i made the offer to you, d3rr, but you were snippy and you told me that you had that sht under wraps..

yeah, i see, you obviously have that sht under control, now dont you?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

What, tech help? I'm down. The heat is off now that no one is here, but I'd still be interested in any improvements that can be made. I can't remember the specific conversation that we had but some offers for help have been strange.

[–]specialsauces 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

well, first you need some competent moderation.. truth is, i liked ameliamay, a lot, i thought she was wonderful as a mod..

the first that needs to be done is that the homepage needs to be cleaned...

next, the core functions of this site need to be reworked.

and, the whole site needs to be put up on the darkweb so that nobody can shut it down..

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

So much work for an antique codebase that no one cares about. But if you can form some kind of consensus and multiple people wants changes, I'm down. I think the future looks a lot like Lemmy.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

this country is in a fucking war right now.. and we are sitting here arguing with foreign paid shills and bots.

this is bullshit.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

How are you going to have anonymous social media without shills and bots? You're not. Pay to play.

[–]specialsauces 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

omg, are you ever wrong about this....

for example, do you remember that bullshit user that used to post all of the "AMERICANS ARE SO BATSHIT CRAZY THAT BLAH BLAH BLAH"...

and everybody just let that shit fly like nothing was wrong with it..

just fyi, that was not a user that was here to communicate with others.. he was, however, here to disrupt and to discourage and confuse.. and he did a wonderful job..

all you would have had to do was to put all new users into a quarantine until others vote to bring him out of quarantine.

you could have done some really simple things to make this forum work better, but you didnt.

and now your site is dead.

and guess what, now is the time when it is needed, not yesterday, not last week, not last month, but now.

[–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

so now that you have entirely failed at running this site, you would allow me to gather up a consensus, pass it thru you for approval, fuck that shit.

i am not walking behind no snot nosed little bitch like you.

best get that thru your head now.

[–]TheAmeliaManiac 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think that you may have sunk your own chances, and it is clear that you wish to damage the site by posting porn, complaining about the place and promoting your own amateur attempt. I like that you like TheAmeliaMay. she was a mod after my own heart. Clearly putting people in their place, banning the troublemakers and working hard towards site reform.

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You are from a country that invaded Gaza a few days ago.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

nah, i am down here by arkansas.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not trying to gatekeep, I'm just saying this isn't my site and I can't just willy nilly go changing shit around. I do have mangora's ear if enough people wanted something changed, that's why I always talk about consensus. Your main concerns seem to be policy/political in nature, that's not my department and I opt out of all of that shit.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    you are going to need to be creative to make this site work..

    i keep thinking that the moderation process is slightly broken and not working very well..

    what if, instead of having individual moderators over each sub, what if you had a panel of mods that oversee the entire site.. and maybe they remain silent, a bit like the supreme court, for example..

    i dont know..

    [–]TheAmeliaManiac 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    How about having a number of admins that don't post much, but that keep spam and bots out, and investigate users that use disruptive spam to drive conversations to promote their own darknet websites, then have lower-level sub based mods who keep those places working, with recourse for users to appeal to the (silent) admin layer when the sub mods misbehave?

    Sounds like a fantastic model.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–]Akali 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Said the dude who spam shitpost and upvote them with fake account.

      You're still correct though. It need slightly less subs.

      [–]oooooooooooooooooooo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      i dont know from where you are getting your information. I have a completely clean record. I was an eagle scout. I can tie fishing flies with a blindfold and both hands tied behind my back.

      this whole thing where we have fifteen trillion subs only serves to divide people and it allows the corrupt and the perverse to easily find a dark corner in which to molest our children.

      true facts.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      You mean like the upvoting system.

      How about we have another upvote category for "let's discuss" rather than just giving the OP a pat on the back for posting something we agree with.

      There are also already a few discussion based subs. We could increase those.

      [–]oooooooooooooooooooo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      i simply do not need random people "voting" either for or against my opinions.

      it is so easy to establish some kind of vote brigade(isnt that what they call it when groups gang up and vote you down or up?) and i think that reddit is proof that this exists..

      on reddit, if you say something that isnt "woke" and totally transgender "friendly", your post gets "hidden", for fks sake.

      maybe the forum should be more like a twelve step meeting, where people sit in a room and take turns talking, simple like that..

      nobody votes on what you say in a 12step meeting.

      and it is really forbidden for someone to even critique what you say, when they speak after you..

      anyways, this current system only divides and allows the perverse and corrupt to move about the airplane freely, while normal people are restricted.

      [–]TheAmeliaManiac 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      it is a good job you built a website for that. Do you really have to try and break this one to promote yours?

      [–]EVERYBODYPANIC 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      And who chooses which topics get posted, chief?

      [–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      i am not exactly sure, but the current model isnt working, right?

      i am pretty sure that we are at war right now and that is what we should be focusing on... my whitehouse has a large fence with razor wire around it.

      if we were on the titanic and we had just hit an iceberg, dont you think that our current situation should be the only topic to be dealt with?

      instead, we have lesbians in /s/lesbians discussing their hatred for men and we have some kind of watch people die sub and we have omg so fucking many subs that you can get lost in this forum faster than if you were just lost in outer space.

      i really think that this site is dead, i could fix it, really i could, but i am not gonna work behind d3rr, fk that shit.

      i would invite miss amelia may to be my senior officer, and anybody that didnt like that would immediately go into quarantine status.

      [–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      You're not sure?

      Have a think.

      [–]TheAmeliaManiac 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      The current model works for the majority of saidit users.

      i would invite miss amelia may to be my senior officer, and anybody that didnt like that would immediately go into quarantine status.

      There would be no users left

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

        nah, I just pushed a code change the other day

        [–]Debra_L 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        XD And all this just because /u/magnora7 couldn't leave /s/ironleft on /all?

        Must've been one heck of a ban-gasm for him... Can we get an estimate of how many man hours it cost you guys to deal with the fallout?

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Beats me, I haven't kept up with all of the drama here. My code was like 2h of effort but it's Reddit's fault for formerly being fake open source.

        [–]Optimus85 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        Just some troll trying to demoralise the userbase. Why are you here? What is your objective?

        [–]uv43 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        [–]Node 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        Where are you going to go? Sure, admins have declared war on enemy users, but even voat had that "builder" episode.

        Even with all the censorship and drama here on saidit, there are still some useful posts. Found this yesterday on a cancel culture post about Baen Books. Sample or download on the right.

        https://www.baen.com/monster-hunter-international.html

        [–]RightousBob 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Fuck off asking questions with your hours old account.

        This site must be right over target to get brigaded the way it has been. Keep up the good work Saidit, you're striking a nerve.

        [–]hennaojichan 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        Even posts from that raging idiot faggot \u\ooooooooooooo can't keep people away.

        [–]Akali 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        This side has 3 things : Unfiltered news, unfiltered meme and funny people. See it as a subreddit with a great community and you'll find out its far from dead, it's slowly growing.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [removed]

          [–]TheAmeliaManiac 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          If this was reddit, I'd give you pretend internet gold in exchange for real money

          [–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

          theameliamaniac returns

          [–]Akali 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

          In all seriousness, why the hatewagon on amelia? I got super confused by the last witch hunt post. What happened?

          [–]TheAmeliaManiac 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          She instituted "public trials" to purge saidit of users that called her out on her bad behaviors in the past, and then advertised to the world that the site admin was out of play. That placed the entire site at risk, and attempted to fundamentally change the saidit culture. All far outside her role as defined by /u/magnora7.

          She also seems to have lied a lot, often changing what she was saying within a few posts, then denying it. It was pretty bizzarro.

          [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          I have a long history with him. When he first turned up he posted all this personal info and told us to go read it. So I did, and made a comment based on the first link. He accused me of stalking him and it has been going downhill ever since.

          Recently he was made an admin. I guess my skills at spotting dark personality types are not universal, and the boss fell for his honeyed self-aggrandising lies. That was fine for a while, he did his job and removed spam and bots, but he also started a campaign against those who had 'wronged' him.

          Which devolved into him stating that magnora7 was away (totally unprofessional. If I were a bad actor like /u/specialsauces then I'd just have been invited to fuck the site up with porn and spam and concern trolling) and then ##TAKING## /s/gov away from a dead user (claiming dead subs is a big no-no that /u/magnora7 is often asked to do and repeatedly says no to) and then starting public trials of the remaining users that he doesn't like.

          I piled in, because the best form of defense is attack, and I know his history, so know he has no standing as an admin, and no right to start the shit he started.

          And it all turned to crap :D

          Lots of lies, growing paranoia, culminating into an incredible post where he names a number of users "enemies of saidit" and condemns a rather lovely user for 'siding with' enemies of (the state) saidit. Its all rather hyperbolic authoritarian / stalinist. Then he deleted most of his content, made the stolen sub 'private' (first time i've ever seen something like that on saidit) and vanished without a trace.

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [removed]

            [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            1 day ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by extrovert19 on "Front-yard Foraging & Mail Call - How to Forage fo..." (removed spam)

            1 day ago TheAmeliaMay removed link "Leaked proof of u/TheAmeliaMay & u/loki88 (aka LXX..." by SaidItLeaks (remove)

            1 day ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by SaidItLeaks on "Leaked proof of u/TheAmeliaMay & u/loki88 (aka LXX..." (remove)

            2 days ago TheAmeliaMay removed link "How to reform SaidIt." by That88Kid (remove)

            2 days ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by That88Kid on "How to reform SaidIt." (remove)

            2 days ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by That88Kid on "How to reform SaidIt." (remove)

            2 days ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by That88Kid on "How to reform SaidIt." (remove)

            2 days ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by That88Kid on "How to reform SaidIt." (remove)

            2 days ago TheAmeliaMay removed comment by That88Kid on "How to reform SaidIt." (remove)

            well well, you are right. Good move by the maniac there. Still, removing those posts ... they were not spam, were not breaking the pyramid of debate. /u/magnora7, more mod abuse.

            Interesting another user put together the uxluvvi accounts and tam...

            [–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

            Bye

            [–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

            bye.

            [–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            You are a sad individual.

            [–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            mayber.

            [–]MisandryFTW 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            I came here because of the banning of female oriented subs on reddit. I try to avoid most subs here because shit is crazy. I would join Ovarit but I'm not comfortable giving them my personal information in case they get hacked.

            [–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Thank you for contribution one post poster.

            [–]oooooooooooooooooooo 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            i am here to read the job listings.

            [–]christnmusicreleases 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Nope.

            [–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            It's not dead it's just cluttered with boring overly dramatic crap atm. Trust me this site used to be better before this fake drama between mods or w.e.

            [–]turn_coat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

            Not sure what the fuck is going on tbh.

            [–]jet199 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

            Did you see the Handforth Parish Council meeting?

            It's like that but less important.

            [–]TheAmeliaManiac 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

            I hope to one day become a site admin, so that I can reform this site more to my tastes.

            [–]GConly 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Why?

            We are here because why like it here as it is.

            [–]Akali 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            Talk about a vague statement, what reform would you do?

            [–]TheAmeliaManiac 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            I'd change the way the default home page works using algorithms designed to promote conversation forming information from a variety of users and also mix in new articles

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Good question.

            [–]deleted 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            We'll ask him that when we get there

            [–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

            i dont think that this site can recover from this.

            [–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

            Which specific 'this' do you mean?

            [–]TheAmeliaManiac 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            /u/specialsauces, i think.

            [–][deleted]  (2 children)

            [removed]

              [–]TheAmeliaManiac 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

              well, that is an outright declaration of ill intent towards this site.

              [–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

              i guess that you havent seen the home page of http://saidit.net

              [–]Node 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

              Oh, that. I was thinking you might have meant the declaration of war on enemy users. I believe you were declared one of the enemy? Yes, "war" and "enemy users" were the specific terms.

              There's no tagging here, so I don't really keep up very closely with who's who. Although I do recognise around many of the main posters.

              [–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

              enemy users? are you ten years old? oh my gawd.

              [–]Node 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

              You have allied yourself with bobbobbybob, specialsauces, lxxxviii, loki88, mega16, and all the enemies of SaidIt — you are an enemy of SaidIt, and an enemy of mine, and an enemy of the entire movement to reform SaidIt.

              You have chosen your side; I have chosen my side; this is war.

              https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/7esj/im_doing_things_differently_from_here_on_out/rxrw

              No, are you? Do you see where it says:

              enemies of SaidIt

              you are an enemy of SaidIt

              an enemy of mine

              and an enemy of the entire movement to reform SaidIt.

              this is war.

              You have specifically been declared an enemy user by the admins. I'm probably suspect just by talking to an enemy user. lol

              [–][deleted]  (9 children)

              [removed]

                [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

                i find these forums to be a clusterfuck of fucknoise.

                congratulations for wasting your hard earned money to build a pile of crap like saidit

                and yet, you are still here ... Funny ...

                [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                [removed]

                  [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

                  I would shit an you.

                  Learn English first, then we'll talk.

                  [–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                  When is your 11th birthday?

                  [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                  [removed]

                    [–]specialsauces 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    battleship.. A6 to B9.. boooomm..

                    [–]TheAmeliaManiac 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    I think that the admins were away, so a junior spam/bot cleaner decided to LARP as important.

                    [–]PatDaddysFShack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Yes it is. It's complete trash.

                    [–]plopper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Yez