Inspired by another post I made on here.
Staying with an abusive female partner who has zero respect for you, emotionally abuses you and mistreats you, and openly cheats on you with other men, while you "allow" it. Can be a willing enjoyer of said abuse, or undesiring of it. Usually also involves financially supporting the female abuser as well (which is the only reason she stays with you.)
Almost all cucks tend to be male feminists/soyboys and politically left-leaning.
One could argue the cuck at least has some positive traits, if he could initially get the woman to begin with.
Being a spineless doormat of a male (usually online) and volunteering to be abused by a woman who doesn't respect you, is only using you for financial gain, and likely doesn't care about your very life or existence and probably doesn't even know your name. Simps usually simp as a fantasy of pretending to be with a woman they can never have through tipping or gifts, in order to get a minor amount of attention or emotional validation from her, and almost always tend to be unattractive men who no woman would ever want to date/sleep with, to begin with.
The majority of simps tend to be politically neutral or right-leaning (and excuse their simpery as "being a gentleman" or "old-fashioned"), although many are left-leaning as well.
One could argue the simp is mostly just hurting himself through financial submission/being a pay-pig and that the long-term emotional abuse isn't as bad as a willing cuckold due to it being mostly apathy from the woman, or ignoring the man, rather than direct mistreatment or abuse like with cucks.
So which is more degrading/emasculating/pathetic? The cuckold or the simp?