Boys are being sexually mutilated and having parts of their penises harvested for profit, and the author of this article decides to use this as an opportunity to talk about how girls are the real victims? What the fuck?

I’m not really sure how I feel about this whole baby-foreskin-beauty-cream.

Really? It's not complicated. Doctors found a new way to profit off of circumcision, so now they're going to push this unnecessary and harmful procedure even more. It was always about profit for them.

But don’t compare female genital mutilation to male circumcision.

What else should we compare it to, if not the thing that most resembles it?

I think we can all agree that we are not oppressing boys when we circumcise them.

No. It's socially acceptable to amputate part of a boy's genitals, but not a girl's. There's not a single country in the world that has banned male circumcision. No matter where you go, you are legally allowed to cut off your young son's foreskin for any reason (or no reason at all), and you don't need his consent. It's discrimination on the basis of sex on a global scale, that sounds like a form of oppression to me.

but we aren’t doing it because we think they are whores by nature who cannot be trusted with their libidos.

This is literally why American circumcision exists. To prevent boys from enjoying masturbation, to deter "self-abuse."

See: John Harvey Kellogg