all 3 comments

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

All modern societies were built on the teachings of Sigmund Freud. Beliefs that are simply a means of viewing the world through his eyes. I assure you that you were not born thinking of yourself as an ego, or having an id or a super ego. These were things you learned, things that those in control built into our society as the 'correct' way to view your world.
With that in mind, I assure you that everything you just said is wrong. Your comment reads like that of a person who has recently gone through a great loss and is trying to make sense of it by viewing these events through rights and wrongs, self visualized heroism versus a villain. The generalizations you have implemented to view the world, everyone in it, your past and future may help you to ease your pain, but it will not help you to think your way through problems in the future, only to hide from them. You must learn to think your way through the complexities of life, to categorize the things in your life into more than dual categories. To shape your own mind by questioning everything.
This is not an external struggle you are dealing with, this is an internal one. Though I assure you, that it is caused by someone having a plan for the future, your future, and it has nothing to do with love. And they view your life as the one without purpose.
Don't fall for this fallacy, this simple view of the world they have given you. This false world. You must see it all, you must aspire to understand everything and how it's all connected together. As one doge equals one doge, love is love. Never forget that.

[–]calmbluejay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I assure you that you were not born thinking of yourself as an ego, or having an id or a super ego. These were things you learned, things that those in control built into our society as the 'correct' way to view your world.

LOL My husband would differ with you.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Either you quoted the wrong section, or I am not following your logic.

Edit: In addition, I see no reason for you to point out that you are laughing at me, nor to write it out in the short hand of "LOL". Such sloppy grammar does not promote rational thought, or convey any meaning.