Hi guys, well a lot of people have asked me questions about it and I myself have been wanting to do something like this myself so I thought about making my own compilation and here you have it…

I don’t believe that the national socialists didn’t kill any Jews whatsoever, but I do deny there was an extermination plan from their side and I do believe that more Jews died because of the crisis of the country caused by allied bombing that whatever the national socialists did, despite the fact that they weren’t trying to hide their own bias/hatred against them. Because of that I will attack both the mainstream version and the revisionist narratives of the Holocaust. So here we go:

1. The fact that there was a plan from Zionist Jews and the Germans in order to deport the Jews to Palestine. It’s called the Haavara agreement. If the national socialists truly wanted to commit genocide against the Jews, helping them leave the country is not a good idea. This is usually ignored by the mainstream version of the holocaust stories and the revisionists are somewhat more honest by saying that whatever killings happened, they happened in the final years of the war. However I will later explain why the revisionist stories are also flawed.

2. The many contradictions between the mainstream version of the holocaust and the revisionist stories. Why don’t we hear stories of Soaps that were supposedly created by using Jew fat anymore? Well that’s because of the pressure from the revisionists stories. But why is there such a huge difference between the different versions? There are so many alternate versions of the Holocaust narrative that even Netanyahu of all people, is following the “Hitler did nothing wrong meme”. A lot of people are sure that whatever killings happened, ignoring random events of violence, they happened with gassing with Zyklon B, for example, but I will later explain why such claims make no sense.

3. The Jewish population before, during and after the war barely changed and even increased at first.

4. The many contradictions in the history of Höss. In his story, Höss said that he and his men constantly pulled the Jews into and outside the chambers in order to kill them in intervals of 10 minutes, but it can take up to 20 hours to clean a room in which Zyklon B was used and It’s a very complicated procedure, so the SS officers would have also died. Not just that, he said they did so while they were smoking cigarrates, which would have caused the gas to explode. So yeah, the story of Höss is a blatant lie. His confession was written in English and he didn’t even knew how to write in English. It also brings attention to what the other tortured officers said. People tend to use the confessions of the German officers as evidence but conveniently ignore how they were tortured into saying those things. Also, what I just explained earlier about the gas makes me want to pay attention to something else…

5. The impracticality of the gas chambers. If it took so damn long for a room in which Zyklon B was used to be cleaned, then they weren’t very useful in order to commit the genocide. If the Germans truly wanted to commit mass murder against the Jews, they could have just used other methods. Also, keep in mind what I said earlier about there being somewhat of a consensus that a lot of killings took place by gassing, but the impracticality of the gas chambers has been proved many times before.

6. Eyewitness testimonies are unreliable. These applies to both the statements of the Holocaust survivors and the tortured SS officers. Also there has been Jews themselves who have admitted that their stories were fake, like Joseph Hirt. Or others who said they were treated fairly by the national socialists. This is because the conditions of those camps are very different from what we are always told. I will talk more about this later.

7. The International Red Cross report of 1948. In which the claims of the camps being used for mass extermination are ridiculed and it also explains how the Red Cross did all it could to stop the allied forces from attacking the food supply routes which caused many Jewish deaths at the end of the war.

8. The conditions in which the national socialists had placed the Jews in at those camps is vastly different from what we are always told. The Jews at Auschwitz had access to a swimming pool for exercise, a theather and a prostitute house.

9. The true maximum cremation capacity at Auschwitz-Birkenau is far lower than what we are always told. So how could the national socialists measure up to the mainstream and even the revisionists stories of the mass genocide when they were helping the Jews leave the country, the gas chambers weren’t practical at all, the Jews themselves had access to quite a few comforts in the camps and the Germans didn’t have the means to get rid of that many bodies?

10. The lack of evidence when it comes to the killings. I’ve showed how the facilities in which the Jews were supposedly killed is very different from what we are always told. So when it comes to the evidence, a lot of it comes from “Holocaust survivors”, the tortured SS officers and endless propaganda. I’ve already explained how the eye witness accounts are unreliable and personally I’ve seen JIDF shills using pictures taking from Gulag camps and even from Jews who died at the end of the war in order to trigger an emotional response, but as I’ve mentioned, those people died from the terrible conditions of the country caused by allied bombing. We have to be as objective as possible when it comes to analyzing evidence. If bodies or ashes were indeed found, what evidence do we have that those deaths were the result of a mass extermination plan?

11. In Eli Wiesel's book titled 'Night' he wrote that as the Soviet army was coming near he was in the Auschwitz hospital having a sore leg treated. I have to ask what was a Jew doing in a hospital in Auschwitz if it was a death camp? And why would there even be a hospital in a death camp. Also, he doesn't mention gas being used and when the choice came that he would either retreat with the Germans or stay and be under the Soviet umbrella he chose to retreat with the Germans but now he claims Germans killed millions of Jews.

12. The fact that the stories of six million Jews being gruesomely murdered or were in danger of being killed were already there before WWII in different places from Germany too. Six million Jews supposedly died in WWI, but probably because of the absurd claims, these stories were dropped and the myth of 6 million Jews being in terrible danger can be seen at different locations until the supposed mass extermination plan in Germany.

It’s over. It’s a myth with straightforward religious qualities.

Now, even if you consider everything I’ve said earlier, It’s still possible that killings did happened under the national socialists when you consider the fact that they weren’t trying to hide their hatred against them. But the thing they want you to ignore is that the context is completely different. There is a huge difference between the mainstream story about the entire German society working together in order to kill them and a few German officers who randomly decided to get violent. If killings still happened, then it was bad and should be called out upon but instead of this people just get endlessly shamed while conveniently ignoring the way the Jews take advantage of their victim status. Is it really fair for the Germans to constantly pay for crimes that only a few of them did, or that may have not even happened at all? Of course not. That’s why I don’t shy away from being an anti-Semitic nationalist. That by itself doesn’t mean I want violence or anything like that, I just think people shouldn’t live in fear of calling them out on their actions, like how a lot of them have influence over the media or even how they’ve taken advantage of the Holocaust. If the Jews are a powerful group, then It’s about time they start taking responsibility for the influence they have. Just like David Cole, Jewish Holocaust revisionist and author of “The truth behind the gates of Auschwitz. Here is an interview with him back in 2018.