The 2003 SARS virus does not miraculously evolve 4 new inserts in its genome that match 4 sequences from a completely unrelated virus by itself and especially not when those 4 new sequences all combine in the physical sense to create and improve the binding site on the virus spike protein. The statistical probability for that to happen by chance and create a working improvement to the virulence of the original SARS is literally astronomical and on top of all that, for the virus the new sequences all matched by a supposed random chance to be of all things, HIV-1, is statistically ludicrous.
If they all matched sequences from a random vegetable or a fish virus or a butterfly or a carrot, even that would still be astonishing but for it to turn out to be the one most well known human pandemic virus in living memory - The HIV-1 AIDS virus that is also of highly controversial origin, it would be ludicrous to even entertain the idea that it happened naturally by chance. It is absolutely and beyond statistically impossible and next I will clarify why that is true.
The lengths of the 4 new inserts in this coronavirus were sequences of 6,6,12 and 8 amino acids. There are 20 different amino acids so the probabality they would all match sequences from another, unrelated virus by random chance is about 1 in 2032. If you want to calculate how long that number is, it has 32 zeros and is more than there are stars in the universe. Then, for that one virus they match to turn out to be, of all things, HIV-1, it is just not even plausible to try to calculate how statistically unrealistic it is to imagine that could have happened by chance.
This means SARS-COV-2 is beyond all shadow of a doubt, of lab origin. Once we have established that, it raises a miriad of other questions.
- Who took the 2003 SARS virus and improved it by adding those 4 new inserted sequences?
- Was the 2003 SARS also of lab origin and what about MERS?
- Who took the new improved version of SARS and infected the bat with it in 2013 (RaTG13/2013) so they could attempt to claim a natural origin?
- As this is obviously evidence that someone is covertly releasing bioweapons and that it is being covered up by our governments, I think it is safe to assume this is not going to end here with some kind of a vaccine so what will the perpetrators do next if the release of this coronavirus fails to achieve their objective?
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)