all 2 comments

[–]oaf 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I’m not discounting what you’re saying as untrue. In particular the “sickcare” part. I will say that it does work for some people, myself being one of those people, and it can’t be completely disregarded. However, like you said, I feel to a degree that it is by design a way to oppress.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I agree. It works for some people. People wouldn't partake if it didn't.

Yet the entire system is based on profit so it is utterly corrupt.

It's so corrupt that it suppresses alternatives - like the iboga in the documentary, among countless others. They need to own the patents on medications so people are forced to take dangerous risky anesthetics when they could use simple ketamine which is vastly safer, does not suppress heart rate nor breathing - but it's old, not patented, and not profitable. But it's reliable so they use it on babies and old people - and of course animals of all sizes.

What if people with cancer did NOT do chemotherapy? Maybe they might have a better chance at surviving. But they don't test for that.

What if they didn't stop the world for this virus? Maybe it would be just another bad flu. We shall never know. But they will claim that it would have been worse, likely with rigged numbers as fake as the climate change scam, and all those fuckers that weren't prepared are going to get promoted AND more funding.