"Died Suddenly" Documentary Being Called Out [For A Couple Of] Inexcusable [Editorial] Mistake[s] - Viva Frei (11:36) ~ Viva Frei

submitted by JasonCarswell from youtube.com

all 47 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Bigs 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"Oh the montage wasn't about people who died suddenly, in the video with the fcuking title of 'Died Suddenly'?

Quit giving this shit the benefit of the doubt; it was built to be debunked and make us look loony-toon

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why not both?

[–]MightyMorphinFaggot 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Everyone talking about the guy passing out saying SEE EVERYTHINGS FAKE.

So in 70 minutes of footage, the only shit that they're saying is fake, is 5 seconds worth of footage.

I am I the only big brain over here looking at what the msm will not mention??

I'll take my iq elsewhere.

but muh movement

Fuck right off all the normies you want to join the cause are probably 10 jabs deep already.

[–]Schwarzenigga 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

[A Couple Of] Inexcusable [Editorial] Mistake[s]

#1 the movie lacks the basic evidence to make its claim about sudden deaths

#2 see #1

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

#1 the movie lacks the basic evidence to make its claim about sudden deaths

#2 see #1

1) Your comment lacks the basic evidence and citations to make any claim about the documentary.

2) It's common knowledge that you, socks, are an authoritarian shill for big pharma.

3) See 1) and 2).

[–]Schwarzenigga 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

'Died Suddenly' is shilling for the 1% GOP disinformation Nazis, as do you. It's really sad -and dangerous- that you and 10% of the US are so confused about this.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Confused about the chronic abuses of authority?
I think not.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

The film “Died Suddenly” rehashes debunked claims and conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 vaccines

DETAILS
Inadequate support: Without a pathological analysis that takes into account the clinical history of the person, images of blood clots alone don’t provide sufficient evidence of an association between these clots and COVID-19 vaccines. No evidence suggests that vaccines are causing a rise in mortality. Therefore, claims that they are used for depopulation are baseless.
Misleading: Many of the people that the film implied to have died after vaccination are actually alive. Others died of causes unrelated to vaccination, such as accidents and underlying medical conditions.

KEY TAKE AWAY
Data from vaccine safety monitoring programs indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and not associated with any increase in mortality or sudden deaths. While certain COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with a slightly increased risk of blood clotting and heart inflammation, these conditions are more likely to result from COVID-19 itself than from vaccination.

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/the-film-died-suddenly-rehashes-debunked-claims-conspiracy-theories-covid-19-vaccines/

[–]agent_pecan 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

I know many people hurt by the vaccines. Go fuck yourself.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know many people hurt by the vaccines.

So all you need to do is answer these questions

1) How many?
2) How confidently can you attribute their hurt to "the vaccines"?
3) How many people do you know that weren't hurt by "the vaccines"?
4) How many people do you know that weren't hurt by infections because they were vaccinated?

And your anecdote is still much more crap than a proper trial, because "people you know" isn't a random sample, and so may be biased by some confounding factor.

Go fuck yourself.

This is just a good an argument as your other one.

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

No, you don't

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

The covid 'vax' causing myocarditis and other side effects is well established nigger.

[–]Schwarzenigga 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Says those who cling onto the dumbest hivemind in the US - the GOP disinformation Nazis - focused on claiming facts are not facts. Fact: mild myocarditis, requiring initial blood thinners and in some cases perhaps more than that), occured in 1 in a [b]illion patients after a COVID vaccine dose. You know this. Pre-existing myocarditis was also possible in some of those cases - we'll call this the Hunter laptop theory. I have no evidence for this, but don't need any, according to the 'died suddenly' movie.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Fact: mild myocarditis, requiring initial blood thinners and in some cases perhaps more than that), occured in 1 in a million patients after a COVID vaccine dose.

So you agree with me? Great argument nigger.

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🙄

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

1 in a million patients after a COVID vaccine

So if 12.7billion doses have been delivered, that means myocarditis occurred in 12,700 people. That is a significant number.

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Seems you spotted a typo. Many thanks. It's 1 in a billion.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Calling people Nazis for being curious that a new mass issued medication could have led to unnecessary deaths where they might e lived if they just caught the virus is not doing your argument any justice. It just comes across as petulant and childish, and if anything, re-enforced any counter argument.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

IFIFY
Inadequate support: Without a pathological analysis that takes into account the clinical history of the person, it's utterly absurd, systemically murderous, and pathologically insane to demand that every individual take an experimental injection.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

True but irrelevant. The vaccine is well out of its experimental phases, and there are half a dozen options on the market now, so no one is demanding that everyone take any one.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

so no one is demanding that everyone take any one.

As if.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I'm upvoting your nigger ass because you are right this time. See, it's not so hard to accept when your side is wrong. You should try it sometime.

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Perhaps I'm wrong to claim that the people you know call you: 'sweetie-pie'

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

^ socks the nigger. you are a brain dead piece of shill shit.

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep - I would be wrong about that. Hope you're happy I am now wrong about something.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

People...died suddenly. What greater evidence is required? That they get resurrected to tell their story?

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

dude...

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

👉🍋

That's you. You're a lemon.

[–]jagworms 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Look at it this way: despite its flaws, this film is far more truthful than all of the "science" we were told to follow, which all turned out to be bullshit.

[–]Ehhhhhh 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Perhaps, but have to wonder on the motives of including the clip of the basketball player.

Did they do that in an attempt to discredit the parts that were possibly legit? This way, people say that it's been debunked and don't take the time to see which was wrong or they question it all.

Have the film makers answered as to why that clip was included?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

This is an excellent movie in spite of its intentional limited hangout flaws.

/s/Terminology/comments/5jrg/limited_hangout_the_deliberate_revelation_of_some/

/s/propaganda/comments/ysd/propaganda_basics_the_limited_hangout/

[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It was definitely impactful. Parts I'd seen before, such as the DMED data, clots and fibrous growths.

It is terrifying to think of all of the people who've already died from the jab along with others who haven't yet.

I do know someone who died the day after taking the jab from cardiac arrest and at least three others who developed aggressive cancer.

They are victims of a sick agenda. These jabs were not meant to help. It's disappointing that the documentary is flawed, but I don't regret sharing it.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

Agreed.

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You think they were intentional? Maybe so. They left far too many questions unanswered after asking them. Answering any one of them conclusively would have nailed the case shut, but they missed that opportunity - why? To push the film release without it? Because they're too dumb to know how relevant it would be? Or like you suggest - the limited hangout. . .

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

Agreed. Insightful.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I suspect that you're mistaken about that.

This film looks to be bullshit through and through.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

_I suspect that you're mistaken about that.

So now you want to be skeptical and think for yourself?

This film looks to be bullshit through and through.

Tastier than what you've been serving.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

So now you want to be skeptical and think for yourself?

I want to be skeptical and follow the evidence.

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

OK, did you look at the evidence skeptically, or swallow it whole? There is no convincing pro-vaccine data - it doesn't exist. But there's plenty of propaganda telling you to take it anyway. But now that the death and injury data is coming out, it would be foolish for anyone, of any age, to take the vaccine.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

There is no convincing pro-vaccine data - it doesn't exist.

Vaccines save lives. There's no medical intervention that has saved more since antibiotics. The evidence isn't weak or in any way non-convincing.

But now that the death and injury data is coming out, it would be foolish for anyone, of any age, to take the vaccine.

Other way around.

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Vaccines save lives. There's no medical intervention that has saved more since antibiotics. The evidence isn't weak or in any way non-convincing.

I'm calling your bluff. No vaccine that currently exists has been tested against inert placebo for safety. They assume the older one is safe, and compare the new one to it. That's not science, that's fuckery.

Your support of vaccines is not fact based, it's faith based. I don't want to continue to denigrate your religion, so please GTFO.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No vaccine that currently exists has been tested against inert placebo for safety.

That's ridiculous.

Here's one for the Oxford, AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine. The control was a placebo of saline.

Very many other vaccines and drugs would have similarly been tested against an inert placebo during phase 3 trials.

Your support of vaccines is not fact based, it's faith based.

Oh, the irony.

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How safe did that one turn out to be? People are dropping like flies.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How safe did that one turn out to be?

Pretty good, afaict.

People are dropping like flies.

Maybe they didn't get the vaccine.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As I said elsewhere...

IMO, I still believe this documentary may be a terrific way to shock-penetrate the thick skulls of sheeple and/or solidify anyone on the fence. This documentary is 100% over the target, even if there are small editorially creative collateral problems.

IMO, Stew Peters is a sensationalist limited hangout. He's mostly correct about most things, but sprinkled with errors enough that "the other side" can easily debunk his flaws.

More examples of problems with this documentary...

"Died Suddenly" Documentary Being Called Out [For A Couple Of] Inexcusable [Editorial] Mistake[s] - Viva Frei (11:36) ~ Viva Frei
/s/Documentaries/comments/a2js/died_suddenly_documentary_being_called_out_for_a/

See also the discussion here:
/s/Documentaries/comments/a1zh/world_premiere_died_suddenly_10821_stew_peters/

 

And also said...

Pick one?

You know that's not how it works. Whether it's corporate media, Alex Jones, Viva Frei, Trump, or whoever - take it with a grain of source. We need to drill down to find whether it's true or not - or something between. Most folks don't have time for that. So as is, it's a very flawed but powerful weapon in the info war.

The video could certainly use a crowd-sourced fan-edit to correct some issues. Shame there aren't more creatives and researchers to draw from and willing on SaidIt. Then again, shame the quality of users here wasn't better, but muh free speech amirite? At least it's not 4-chan I guess.

Taking heart surgery footage off of YouTube and passing it off as something vaccine related is not an 'editorial mistake'.

Overall, I'd totally agree. The producers need to be, and be held, responsible.

As Devil's advocate, there could be a zillion reasons how bullshit was included. From inexperienced interns trying to assemble the most graphic imagery, poor source vetting, financial motives, intentional subterfuge from agents or infiltrators, to shooting themselves in the foot trying to communicate a point via terrible editorial choices.

To the oblivious sheeple it's powerful content.

To skeptics it's inaccurately sloppy if generally on point.

But the worst is how perfectly plays into the enemy's story.

And that's why, for the most part, I avoid Stew Peters - like Alex Jones, Noam Chomsky, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, etc etc etc.

[–]SMCAB 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The fat jew nigger is actually commenting to himself from an alt in this thread. For fucks sake. What a shameless fatfuck.