The L.E.D. Quandary: Why There’s No Such Thing as “Built to Last”

submitted by [deleted] from newyorker.com

all 4 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

That article is trash. And it is not forgotten information but propaganda meant to deflect criticism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The lifeblood of science is critisism. The author ("as usual") only is responsible for what he actually wrote, not for what you put or interpret into it.

So imo this comment more or less is nonsense.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Your opinion is noted and reject forthright.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doubtable.