This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

No the ban was because of being repetitive and failing to engage in good faith. We were banned because we didn’t start shouting the accepted slogans when directed to.

One person being banned for getting silly and snippy after utterly failing to comprehend what was said to them is hardly like women being banned for refusing to welcome males who don dresses and say teehee as the women they claim to be.

If you could actually argue effectively and prove any point we are wrong about you wouldnt need to make extra accounts that will be banned as well.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (7 children)

No, the ban was because you don't like to see how wrong you are.

Ban for all I care. I'll just change my IP. It's not hard.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Haha whatever you need to tell yourself. Sure you spend as long as you like embarrassing yourself on as many accounts as you can make. Doesn’t make us wrong.

You aren’t proving anything other than unfortunate things about your inability to accept being wrong right now though. Belligerence in the face of genuine correction is a dick move and that’s coming from the biggest dickhead to post here.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

Excuse you? Those people are wrong for saying children essentially have no sex. Go read empt's comments:

They think because children do not have developed sex organs, they have no sex. And even if they had a sex, it would be best to ignore it because "the difference between male and female children is minimal".

You are the ones embarrassing yourselves. You have each other's backs even when you're wrong.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Where am I saying that that was a correct statement? Empty humoured you and entertained a way that children could be considered sexless. You decided this is gospel every gc believes and ran with it like a kid with a stolen kite.

You proved nothing about gc and plenty about bad faith posters who come here to stir up some screenshots for gendercynical.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

Empt didn't "humor" me. I never wished for some GC to come and tell me children are sexless creatures. Jesus fucking christ.

The point of the "why aren't children sexless?" question was to know why they aren't sexless, not why some of you think they are.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Because the stupid idea was posited.

Nobody cares what you wanted from here lol.

If you have a shit about genuinely getting answers you’d have engaged with all the other posts and not flipped your lid over one thing.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

That was the freaking point. A stupid idea is posited, and now I want the stupid idea challenged. Not supported.

I don't care what YOU want either. I posted this. It's MY thread. If you're not here to give me what I want then fucking leave.

I'm flipping my lid over this one thing because it's in MY thread.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao are you unhinged?

Children aren’t sexless. They’re sexually immature. Their sex isn’t dependent on active production of gametes but the structures formed that will, without disease or injury or other interference produce gametes at maturity.

You need to calm down so badly lol.