you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ncosenational💊 sovereign 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

o I found one click 1 &dl

https://libgen.fun/get.php?md5=BF8413DBE662A605313B39C4095CA62B&token=7d4c6d9739f5508c

Can’t copy paste the soros empire replacing the soviet empire vid

Btw last time I paid attn to her at all like 2019 she said shes not a member of a party &clearly she was taking some communist girl dick 2think shes so superior 2 every1 else..who said he’s 2old 4her maybe who is lying to her she’s so great bc clearly she’s not… so yeah both of them are exactly who Lenin doesn’t vouche for &she’s a bully

anyway I think sex science &what the dsm did is nambla. I think b4u act is a similar group w similar aims& the sex scientists know it& I had no idea of any of this or that they dont report abuse I knew they had committed abuse some stories but most of them I didn’t know about& I am against that I think they should be prosecuted

I mean the stuff Judith reisman talks about & I agree w her saying the bishops should sue the sexologists who advised them

Idk how I feel ab pedos getting some form of treatment that isn’t like what James cantor advocates for but like Michael salter or some1 like that or idk what anti pedo ppl mean by treatment idk if I even wanted to think ab it to the extent to comment on that but other ppl do &then the pro pedo people try to push that convo &i thought the dsm was a lot better than it is so I just wanted to tell ppl who might not know that … Im against ending mandatory reporting &idk what the consequences should be4 that& Im against ending the sor I think it should be strengthened w more jail time harsh mandatory min sentences in a facility far away from the vulnerable which children inherently are for 1st offense & I’m very against destigmatization if they commit abuse they should get life or death sentence if they fail to report idk I’ll say same idk what is advocated for

like it’s not hard to be against nambla I def would only ever be &violently so. I dont want to ever be any pedo apologist just like she wouldnt be I would rather die than be pedo apologist either I have no beliefs which would ever require that &my beliefs are very against Pedos always have been always will be bc kids can’t consent& I have always been very supportive of the age of consent I think it should be high everywhere nothing else could ever be possible. I only have deepest sympathy 4victims &want kids 2be protected from them w age of consent & safeguarding& all support to survivors never pedos. I have literally never had a single drop of sympathy for any kind of pedo& nothing I ever said was that &I said that from day 1 the 1st time she tried to put those words in my mouth I said I don’t understand this discourse& I copied some other anti ppl saying pedo is an illness they need treatment& I never meant it as sympathetic or feel sorry for pedos don’t put those words in my mouth &the Bihet les abuser kept doing it even tho I told her the 1st time she did it immediately thats NOT WHAT I MEANT AT ALL& WOULD NEVER she doesn’t care she just wants to abuse me

If 1 Socialist woman can do to me what she did any 1 of them can do it to any independent minded female who should auto assume soc women are a threat to them not invite or engage them … if you know they are like that will completely lie not care put words in ur mouth you never said and would never mean and not take accountability ever even when you ask them did you even say that …you put urself in that situation of abuse &you put ur life in danger.. stay away from leftism bc they’ll treat u like that punish u 4stuff they wont punish ppl they think should be there or even lie to punish u for stuff they wanna punish some1 for even if ur very against whatev they’re pinning on u which I was w all she tried 2 put on me I was always only 4 zero tolerance& upset if I missed the mark ever then wished I never tried but why can she make endless posts ab it w mistakes &I can’t also wanna be able to comment on it in a way I agree w noth I don’t agree w,noth tolerance …my mental health is dependent on 1 Bihet abusive behavior she could answer 1 y n ? &end it but she won’t &she knows what’s at stake& it will be until she does right thing or I die … she’s the 1 responsible 4my mental health bc of her gaslight abuse not me& she’s the 1 responsible to fix it by taking accountability 4 her abusive behavior &lies… she said I said horrible things I never said& twisted my words when I did say things I shouldnt have bc I never read ab pedos& I was upset ..my mental health now is a lot better than it was in that moment in 2018 when she decided it’s time to abuse me when I was so upset I couldn’t breathe literally couldn’t breathe or think a coherent thought but she was putting horrible words in my mouth I didn’t say &I managed to reject them I said I didn’t mean to say anything sympathetic I didn’t mean boo-hoo feel sorry for pedos they suffer bc I copied an anti Pedo blog calling it an illness & another 1 sayin same thing slatz said linked elsewhere …I dont relate to pedos any kind of p incl pocd at all I h8 them only ever hated them support all existing crim incl all real cp &support more criminalization stigma intolerance etc… this would never be a convo to me I didn’t know theres ppl like cantor& prostasia trying to say pedos are oppressed &discriminated against &then hold “treatment to prevent csa” over ppls heads to coerce them into listening to sumn they would never entertain …I think she knew I didn’t say or mean any of her lies but got off on bullying me& gas lightin me& saying everyth bad I never said like a power trip.. NOT INTERESTED 😒..I said it’s an Illness maybe &I blamed pedo apologist survivors 4making mistakes which she knows perfectly well they do… she made posts that survivors defend csam on social media herself& she linked to this in that masterpost that demands pedos be an orientation and incl in lgbt https://archive.ph/NleBQ AND I AM SORRY I SAID THAT AND APOLOGISED MANY TIMES SINCE I WAS UPSET AT NOT UNDERSTANDING AND FALLIN FOR PRO PEDO CSA PREVENTION DISCOURSE FOR FIVE SEC ON FIRST EXPOSURE BC CSA INCL REAL CP IS WORST CRIME IN EXISTENCE N I DONT WANT IT TO HAPPEN TO ANY1… all I am asking her Is she lied and said I said ppl should be nicer to Pedos which I know I didn’t that’s against my stated principle of 100% negativity I already said before her abuse… I’m not askikg her to lie I am asking her to tell the truth did I say those literal words SHE is the only person in world who said I ever said. She said she takes screenshots of me saying these things so where Is it if answer is yes or did she put words in my mouth bc I called it an illness when I didn’t know anything and was copying anti pedo blogs like this obligatory statement post that I said is what I agree w everything in it a month before she started her abuse https://archive.ph/6GKOX I also blamed this article I read before any of this was even on my mind in early 2018 I only remembered science daily article summer 2018 &freaked thot I had to figure out what zero tolerance is the only thing I’d ever agree w.. never thot of Pedos as non offending I hate them all want them dead think they’re worst evil predator abusers ALWAYS… all my life.. I never heard of other shit until other ppl say it n I didn’t get it if it’s not straight up decrim but stuff like it’s like they need treatment or some other csa prevention that stuff i was confused at first exposure when i has zero awareness of pro pedo agenda & propaganda & all that stuff is that which it is … I used to think or assume noth like that could ever happen n every1 h8s pedos as they should &no 1 wants decrim or them to be like lgbt https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/8qgzpx/a-child-rape-victim-on-why-society-should-be-more-empathetic-to-pedophiles I thot her story was sad n she wants them to get treatment bc we say kill them all she says we can do that but it won’t change her life I didn’t notice she said ppl should be nicer SUMN I NEVER REMOTELY THOT OR SAID IN MY LIFE EVER &I SAID I HATE PEDOS FOR DEMANDING TO BE CALLED GOOD PPL (virtuous) FOR USING CSA DOLLS &NOT RAPING KIDS that’s the closest thing I said to that &I still think they dont deserve praise or acceptance for not raping kids which is a requirement for every1… also she thinks she wins an argument I never asked for her input on bc she wants to say radical feminism excuses abuse by saying men are inherently violent so radfems can’t be against abuse stfu &lying isn’t winning an argument not that I care but sexology says it depends on if society tolerates it &I always meant to support lgbt or at least lgb acceptance but also think t is some adult orientation2 or maybe another gender idk.. I always meant that I demand zero tolerance for pedosadism.. cantor&nambla&Blanchard support tolerance thats not science that’s their pedo apologist beliefs … cantor admits its not science but namblas agenda &the scientists do the things they do bc they “listen to pedo acceptance activists” which is b4u act who are like nambla… https://youtu.be/d7qVoYTJL80.. the psych who took gay out of dsm said its not science but activism too

I used to ask her nicely but she keeps gas lighting

I was starting a difficult learning process obv many people don’t ever attempt bc it’s some weirdos like James cantor &nambla doing it &I made some mistakes w what I thought was correct I was trying to copy anti pedo sources when I didn’t know any of this is going on& thot it’s an anti lgbt stawman… I was trying to be anti pedo 2the max def exclusionary& I would never support Pedos having solidarity w any movement that’s not anyth I ever said I said that obligatory statement post is what I think &they called it an illness.. she wants 2take advantage of that confusion when I was reading ab pedos 4 1st time in my life …I was esp confused ab when they say it’s science or csa prevention &I had to process it &it took way more time than the 1st time I read an anti pedo blog that was in my tl

[–]ncosenational💊 sovereign 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shes not a good faith actor &I think she new wut she was doin.She had no other reason 2treat me like that other than she didnt like me talking ab agp or she thought I was rad fem. Thats the only reason she tried to bully& intimidate me&she thot I am a leftist so she can dump all her grievances on me like accuse me of thinkin Pedos shud get restorative justice bc I said I agree w what slatz said that I cited elsewhere tho I didn’t even say they shouldnt be shot on sight THATS THE 1ST THING I SAID PEDOS NEED. A month be4, in anothr post I was continuin… a lot of leftists say dumb shit ab alienation even ab pedos &abuse &I only meant movements who want attack abuse @the root shud have solidarity w working class power& right after that I said thats not 4pedos who just need 2follow rules of sor not be an identity or have solidarity w any1& my obligatory statement post said they should Never leave house etc& I said kill themselves already when I said thats my obligatory Statement …lots of leftists say alienation &she just wanted 2dump all her grievances on me whether I said that or not bc she saw me as disposable&not welcome in leftism 4no other reason than she has some grudge against rad feminism on behalf of dick havers well I think any1 who cud be wrongilly attacked like that shud say fuck u 2all leftist unless they want 2b socialist womens punching bag even if they never said anyth theyre projecting like prison abolition or reform for ex w me she obv thought she could project all her stupid bs ab that on me when wut she said isnt my stance yes I am sympathetic2reform but never 4peds u idiot& the article Id read a week b4 that was saying alienation is root cause of sex abuse I dont agree w anymore (dw 2 excuse abusers 4 1) &shud never have it has a bunch of nambla talking points in it but then I didnt believe any1 was actually like that I thot it was an anti leftist strawMan so I didnt recognize many issues in it bc I didnt no Namblas talking points then& I shouldnt give ppl benefit of doubt like I did then… it said

Clearly, there are some instances of grave harm that require the segregation of offenders for the protection of society.

Im most disgusted& support all violence against any1 whod ever think or say anyth like this ⬇️ (green).. even as a libfem/lib sex pos 4consentin adults by default I thot this argument was so evil &so disgustin when I saw ppl make it incl those who defend their abusers &say they feel fondly ab it stfu& get a bullet 2the head all of them … I wouldnt remember this mans death fondly like I saw cantor/maybe even Blanchard do on Twatter

Richard Green commented on the proposed change& is opposed. He brings up the implications of sex predator laws in regards 2the addition of hebephilia2 the pedo criteria. “The nature of the person’s offense must be considered. A habitual violent rapist represents a very different universe of public safety from a person who enjoys genital fondling with a compliant pubescent. Currently, the latter are being entombed along with the former by sexual predator law. … These persons’ sexual activity was with persons ‘biologically ready for coitus.’ The men ‘scarcely merit(ed) the emotionally charged label of sex offender’ (Gebhard, et. al. 1965).” Isn’t it interesting that one of the criteria a psychiatrist thinks is important is whether a child is biologically ready for coitus, but emotionally ready does not enter the picture.. [child marriage is legal in US bc of religious rw ppl like those who wrote this. Child rapist protectors… men like Paul C roberts think the child rape party is ab 2start w the measures ppl like u try 2 bring in (common law)… male think they shouldnt be punished 4 preying on children bc ppl like u apparently dont “expect girls 2 stay virginal till college”.. THATS UR MEN.. who is the problem the children they rape or the adult males? Most teen pregnancy is by grown adult males in their late 20s/30s or older.. THATS WHAT THEY THINK UR COMMON LAW WHEN THE AGE OF CONSENT WAS NON EXISTENT BC THE WOMENS MOVEMENT HADNT STRUGGLED 4 IT YET OR IT WAS AT MOST 10 TO 12 YO… MEANS. Those are the utterly sickening subhumans you keep trying to rehabilitate. fuck off u evil child rapist &predator protecting & defending bitch w ur defense of child marriage&ending age of consent the womens movmnt fot 4. Dont ever pretend u give a single shit ab protecting esp female children from adult sex predators..https://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/cpi-m-slams-mos-home-over-marital-rape-statement-115043000003_1.html]

re Paul Craig roberts… namblas immediate goal is also 2lower age of consent to 14 then get rid of it all together

this evil man’s [green] life shud NOT be celebrated by ANY1 who isn’t a sympathizer w the cause of legalizing child rape

Btw R green is the 1 who criticized Blanchard/cantors proposal 2expand category of pedo 2 incl hebe like icd 10 already does & calls it all pedophilia not Pedo hebephilia.. as pathologizing reproductively valid behavior fn 10 and odonohue is the 1 who criticized it as not going far enough per Blanchards Wikipedia it took me a while2 learn that as well. I assumed the ppl sayin it doesnt go far enuf meant they didnt raise the age high enuf which I agree they only raised it 1 yr from 13 to 14 NOT ENUF.. Id never heard of absolutely nowhere on my radar of this paraphilic disorder/subjective distress history & “politics” of dsm & gay movmnt & mental illness shit till well after 2019 at earliest … I didnt no its that they were saying its only not normal if they feel distressed which is what Blanchard did vs odonohue saying it’s never normal bc it’s dangerous to others … I mean blanchadd said its not pathological if they don’t feel distressed or havent raped@ least 3 diff kids & ondonue said it’s always pathological p17 … I agree & have always agreed they didnt raise the age high enough & I also dont agree w the word hebephilia 4 pedophilia. I think it is all pedophilia or pedosadism rather.. icd 10 even calls it all pedo.. always Agreed w this video incl as a lib sex pos 4 consenting adults which is when I 1st saw it long before crit of sex pos by standar of safe sane consensual which kids animals & other situations can never be https://youtu.be/TB9fwJDweaU … but odonohue & that ibtimes article are talking ab someth completely different I had literally 0 awareness of… what criteria 4 pathology is.. that why I’m telling u all this bc I 4 a long time thot it was completely different I assumed it was like odonohue &never normal=inherently pathological/bad& I didn’t know pathologization is an issue @all i had 0 awareness Blanchard did that bc of pressure from pedo movmnt copying gay movemnt gettin out of dsm & becomin orientation w subjective distress move …esp since I Thot they dont get influenced by those activist pressures dredger even wrote a book on that theme &they end up being nambla w all this history &drama of gay movment vs dsm.. its a mess this alone took me a lot of trauma 2learn

…@the same time she was goin round demandin prison abolitionists explain 2her what theyd do ab her dad who sent her2 bed wo dinner prob 4not eating what they gave her.. while her mom was there so how was it not her mom doin it?GET OVER IT DIVORCE IS OVER NOW HES GONE ask ur mom how long u/we all have 2 keep doin this. https://youtu.be/sag37aAf1WU https://preventht.org/editorial/foster-care-and-the-pipeline-to-human-trafficking/ &SHE SAYS SHE USED 2 THINK HE LOVED HER B4 THERAPISTS HER MOM TAKES HER2 CONVINCED HER OTHERWISE I 2 was punished as a child I was beaten &whipped w belts noth like bein preyed on by pedos who h8 kids &get off on ruinin their lives. Not comparable 2parentin. Idk wut she wants prison abolitionists2 tell her ab her parental alienation situation. Her dad doesnt seem 2have done anyth so out of line any1 can do anyth ab it her mom is clearly mad ab her divorce &pulled her kid in2 it. many divorced mothers wouldnt do that. &her mom apparently put her on 14 psych meds/day… shell 4give her mom tho not her dad she used 2think loved her. her mom parent style=drop her off @psychs who tell her she doesnt have 2take responsibility ever bc she has ~LoW eMpAtHy~… she was better off bein punished like normal. Idk what she want prison abolitionist 2tell her ab that &idk y she took it out on me either but I hope every independent minded female sees it &treats all socialist esp soc women accordingly - as abusers &a threat

csa by parents is worst abuse requirin interventn by heavy safeguarded cps but parentin incl punishment is not that. 60% of trafficked kids go thru cps.. w culture of anti parenting hysteria feedin the system

Other than nambla propaganda that was in that article that I shud have been way more disciplined ab that instead of giving benefit of doubt no 1 is like that… I dont agree w the alienation framing of abuse bc it can be misconstrued as solidarity w abusers &I would never mean that. They have solidarity w elite abusers like Engels said… tho I wud never mean they should have solidarity w any progress &I said that I said not 4 them they just need to stay away from kids &every1 else& die. Wo ever doing anyth 2 any kids. I was learnin there was a lot of new Info most stuff I had 0 awareness of yet &a lot of new things I had 2consider &decide on it was the 1st 5min i tried 2even read or think ab it ok