top 100 commentsshow all 117

[–]venecia 97 insightful - 44 fun97 insightful - 43 fun98 insightful - 44 fun -  (20 children)

In my fantasies, I come out with my hundred-thousand karma account, throw off my disguise and proclaim ''BEHOLD. I who has earned your acclaim and friendship for so many years is an evil TERF!''. But realistically they get fucking scary in piecing together information even if you think you've scrubbed your account or fudged some details about your life to throw them off the scent. Plus it wouldn't go as cool as it does in my head lol

[–][deleted] 44 insightful - 11 fun44 insightful - 10 fun45 insightful - 11 fun -  (2 children)

Lol I haven't quite decided where I'm going to go with this. I'm keeping a low profile at the moment and only responding to posts that don't have stuff about TiMs in them. Right now, it's too subtle for them to catch on. I guess it's going to be a game of "lets see how far I can go without being spotted." I probably will be called out eventually, but it's all good. lol It's only to pass the time and amuse myself.

The idea that there could be eViL tErFs In ThEiR sUb keeps them awake at night. I'm definitely not the only GC lesbian there. It's so off the wall how militant they are being about it.

[–]BraveAndStunningTERF 34 insightful - 1 fun34 insightful - 0 fun35 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would imagine they would create "bait" posts, dont fall for it! just be supportive.... Be like water...

[–][deleted] 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They were baiting true lesbians for sure

[–]kwallio 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

How would they tell anymore since all the gc subs got banned?

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They've "tagged" GC posters with masstagger or some other program. If you post in one sub, they'll follow you elsewhere as a "hate poster" to stalk.

[–]kwallio 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't know there were programs that would log what subs people posted in, even after those subs were deleted.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They stalk people who’ve posted in so-called “hate” subs. So they track what subs you go to based on that. That’s why they targeted PCOS— there were a lot of GC posters who happened to subscribe to that sub.

[–][deleted] 83 insightful - 18 fun83 insightful - 17 fun84 insightful - 18 fun -  (8 children)

Terf just means a woman. Notice how they never call men a terf, even if they have the same views. So they want a women-free LESBIAN sub? LOL. Soon enough it'll just be a male circlejerk pretending to be women.

[–]LasagnaRossa 23 insightful - 6 fun23 insightful - 5 fun24 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

I mean, by their standard, that outcome should be okay

[–]littlerbear 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

But isn't the prize being able to pass as a woman so well that lesbians can't even tell they're not women? Don't they kind of screw up their own deal by making it so hostile that no women want to participate in it? How can you garner lesbian cred if you're not dealing with any actual lesbians?

[–]malloww 39 insightful - 3 fun39 insightful - 2 fun40 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

That's the catch-22 they face - they need actual lesbians to validate them, but at the same time the very existence of actual lesbians is invalidating because they're a living reminder of what these guys aren't, whether they're saying it out loud or not. So they need to simultaneously drive actual lesbians out of lesbian spaces and continue to convince themselves that everyone around them are still actual lesbians. I'm pretty sure that's why they overrun every online space, it's easier to pretend that you're talking to real women when you can't see that everyone chiming in about their love of girldick has an Adam's apple. What they don't realize is that it's pretty easy for us to identify them whether we can see them or not, because they're just so.... Male.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And why the emergence of bisexual lesbians is now a thing, along with the transbians and women with transitioned partners are now considered lesbians. It's a lot.

[–]Asplenium 15 insightful - 12 fun15 insightful - 11 fun16 insightful - 12 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Oof_Too_Humid 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

OMG--that's perfect! Ha!

[–]uwubunny 56 insightful - 27 fun56 insightful - 26 fun57 insightful - 27 fun -  (1 child)

Most ironically named subreddit is surely a tossup between ActualLesbians and TwoXChromosomes

[–]owmygenderfeels 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't forget BadFemaleAnatomy and SelfAwareWolves.

[–]11mile_house 53 insightful - 22 fun53 insightful - 21 fun54 insightful - 22 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe they should make a separate sub for the terfs to go to so they won’t bother you. Oh wait.

[–]11mile_house 49 insightful - 29 fun49 insightful - 28 fun50 insightful - 29 fun -  (5 children)

Their paranoia is valid. Sometimes I go back to Reddit just to downvote all their trans posts.

[–]bellatrixbells 30 insightful - 15 fun30 insightful - 14 fun31 insightful - 15 fun -  (1 child)


[–][deleted] 16 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Same guilty as charged Haha

[–]Oof_Too_Humid 16 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Yay. Good for you.

[–]queerone 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Same here!

[–]dancindrudge 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Same lol

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 42 insightful - 14 fun42 insightful - 13 fun43 insightful - 14 fun -  (0 children)

A TERF in my sub? It's more likely than you think!! - Transbians, 2020

[–]Debaser 46 insightful - 1 fun46 insightful - 0 fun47 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

After the recent banwave there was the predictable flood of validation posts and I made my way over here to pick up on my favourite banned subs. AL seemed to calm down a bit and over the past week or so, Ive definitely noticed a lot more people speaking out against the usual trans-centred lesbian-erasing content.

It was encouraging to see, especially since the comments remained - even the ones calling out and challenging the self centred blinkered trans views.

Ive definitely noticed a shift over there. Maybe before we mostly scrolled past and sighed, exhausted at trying to debate with the delusional.

It's only a matter of time before they start banning people since we all know there's no such thing as free speech on reddit anymore.

[–]Chipit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

It's only a matter of time before they start banning people since we all know there's no such thing as free speech on reddit anymore.

I'm confused; don't feminists also not believe in free speech? Don't feminists of all stripes pretty much ban anyone who disagrees with them?

I'm certain that Mackinnon and Dworkin wrote that censorship was required to protect women's speech, and an informed authority was required to intervene and correct for a social power imbalance. Which only leaves the question of who gets to select the authentic representatives of the marginalized and decide what must be censored in their interests?

[–]DogeWalker 24 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 0 fun25 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I'm certain that Mackinnon and Dworkin wrote that censorship was required to protect women's speech

Can you point me to the passages or texts where they said this? I would like to learn more.

[–]Debaser 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Second that. Would be interesting to read.

[–]DogeWalker 12 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

I'm certain that we'll get a reply...

[–]Jamiethiel2018 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is the argument that porn is a form of free speech. We actually don't have absolute free speech, as one is still not entitled to yell "fire" in a crowded theatre. We have to be careful of definitions, but I suspect if the intent is to cause bodily harm, it isn't, and never has been protected speech. Three guesses what "Speech" Dworkin was against ?

[–]DogeWalker 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Spot on. I almost made a follow up comment asking if being anti-porn is what they meant. It certainly takes a galaxy brain to think being against porn is directly equivalent to being anti- freedom of speech.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It depends on if the person is arguing in bad faith, which how most trolls argue. It’s a pretty dependable pattern. There is a difference between actual conversation and pressing particular buttons on purpose. People who do that are not interested in discussion.

[–]Maeven 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Yes, you're clearly confused about feminism.

If you'll do us the courtesy of sharing the relevant passages from Mackinnon and Dworkin, I will explain what you are missing and elaborate further for you.

[–]jet199 28 insightful - 31 fun28 insightful - 30 fun29 insightful - 31 fun -  (5 children)

Ok, admit it.

You aren't even there are you.

You just posted this so they start accusing each other and becoming super paranoid.

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 6 fun15 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

I can imagine someone from r/actuallesbians lurking here reading this post and making it their personal mission as a mod to figure out which user she is and go on a massive banning spree for anyone who uses keywords like 'vagina' or 'pussy' or "periods" hoping to catch her. Haha they are crazy enough to do that. They would probably start banning other "transbians" for mentioning vagina too.

[–]Maeven 14 insightful - 8 fun14 insightful - 7 fun15 insightful - 8 fun -  (2 children)

I'm going to be larping as a transbian there. They want to pretend to be women.. I'll be a woman pretending to be a man pretending to be a woman... and when I finally share my "vagina fetishist" preferences, they won't even mind b/c of course the banhammer never applies to transbians.

[–]LesbiSilly 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Good job, Victor Victoria!

[–]adultxhumanxfemale 40 insightful - 1 fun40 insightful - 0 fun41 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think Reddit deserves the traffic, even if it's to troll or wake up future TERFs. Money is all that a corporation cares about. That's where you hit them because that is where it hurts. They don't give a damn about us, anyway.

[–][deleted] 29 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 0 fun30 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would avoid reddit membership at this point. Their supermods contain some extremely bizarre transwomen who deliberately track and stalk members of so-called "TERF" subs. If I had known how depraved and bizarre some fo those people were, I would've nuked my account a long time ago. I'm sure GC mentioned some of this, but I wasn't on there every day, nor did I ever imagine that women would be deliberately attacked like this.

[–][deleted] 31 insightful - 9 fun31 insightful - 8 fun32 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

They’d better make sure they smoke out all the women who only want to date women, then there will be no one left but trans people and the married-to-dudes queers. Have fun in NotActualLesbians, girls.

Trans women are TERFS too. Barely any want to date trans women.

[–]Ossidiana 26 insightful - 13 fun26 insightful - 12 fun27 insightful - 13 fun -  (1 child)

I'm just imagining a subreddit filled with straight men roleplaying as horny lesbians. It's hilarious.

[–]thatradicallesbian 12 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

That's exactly what r/actuallesbians is! Lol

[–]Hepsibah44 24 insightful - 11 fun24 insightful - 10 fun25 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

Ha ha ha! I just visited and it doesn't look like there are any actual biological women there! r.o.f.l.

[–]BraveAndStunningTERF 21 insightful - 14 fun21 insightful - 13 fun22 insightful - 14 fun -  (4 children)

Appropriate plug /s/Whataboutmygirldick

[–]Oof_Too_Humid 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

First--that is an amazing name for a sub.
Second--You should consider adding links when you post. I keep as a favorite tab so I can backup good stuff frequently. (I went through your existing posts and added them. I'd hate to lose any of these crackpot examples.)

[–]BraveAndStunningTERF 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I have absolutely no idea how to use haha, i'll have to take a look!

[–]Oof_Too_Humid 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How to use First, bookmark it as a favorite so you can get to it quickly and easily:
Next, pick one of the 2 options:
1. Red box “My url is alive and I want to archive its content”.
2. Blue box “I want to search the archive for saved snapshots”.

Red Box/Archive something:
If you’re pretty sure the content has never been archived choose the red box.
Paste the url into the blank space and hit “save” (on the right).
(Sometimes it saves it within 10 seconds. Sometimes you wait in a queue and it’ll take a minute.)
It creates an archived version (actually both a webpage and a screenshot).
Just copy the url of this archived version and share. (Or don’t. But at least it’s archived.)

Blue Box/Looking for content that may have been archived:
Say you click on a link where the content was deleted or it’s behind a paywall. You can copy that url & paste it into the blue box blank space and hit “search” (on the right).
If you’re lucky, someone will have archived it, and the content will show up.
If you’re not so lucky, will send you to 4 other options where you can search: Google Cache, Archive.Org, WebCite, Megaladon. Very often I can find the content through one of these other options.

And that’s It’s really a wonderful resource, and it only gets better with the more people who use it.

[–]Tikiri 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Awesome sub! Thanks for the mention!

[–]littlerbear 26 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

These freakin' ridiculous people. Are there any actual women there or are they all men who identify as women?

[–]marmalade 31 insightful - 2 fun31 insightful - 1 fun32 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Plenty of 'I'm not like other girls' out there desperate to signal how 'cool and woke' they are by bashing on other women.

[–]yishengqingwa666 15 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

"If I shit on other women with you, will you treat me like I have value?!"

[–]dancindrudge 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The Handmaidens.. lol

[–]littlerbear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are a bunch of those on twitter as well. It's amazing how these women really believe that siding with the misogynists will protect them. Does 'coolness' prevent men from noticing that they're women?

[–]Marsupial 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

A shitton of TiMs to be honest. I've been tagging the ones I've been able to identify as trans and there's a lot of them. Ironically, actuallesbians doesn't contain that many actual lesbians.

[–]DogeWalker 24 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 0 fun25 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


terfs won't join it... but terfs will leave it.

[–]SpatOuttheKoolaid 21 insightful - 7 fun21 insightful - 6 fun22 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

After they banned our subs, they're going into withdrawal. What else would they do with their lives?

And yes, we're just beating down the doors for the girldick and the constant "am I valid?"

[–]Marigold-plate 16 insightful - 16 fun16 insightful - 15 fun17 insightful - 16 fun -  (2 children)

Did you actually do it, or are you saying you did like that time Kiwifarms said they taped a warning poster on the outside of Yaniv’s building (because they know he reads KF) and then they laughed as his neighbour reported watching him search the perimeter on his scooter?

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 8 fun17 insightful - 7 fun18 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

I had the same thought lol. If so, that's geniusly evil. That sub is so busy trying to play "terf whack a mole" with bans that if they come into our space and see women are undercover over there, it's going to screw with them. Majorly. They will suspect everyone, even their friends. They will go insane and start destroying their own sub because they think everyone is gender critical and start banning their own members out of paranoia. I'm here for it!

[–]Feather 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao. I wondered this too. All we have to do is claim we're there and they'll go crazy looking for us. I mean, they're already doing that, but still.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 22 insightful - 3 fun22 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I'm kind of confused how this is funny.

We are at a state where women are divided and try to silence eachother. Not to mention that going "undercover" there is such a tra thing to do. Leave them alone in their bubble, it will pop sooner or later.

[–][deleted] 41 insightful - 2 fun41 insightful - 1 fun42 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Humor is subjective. Sometimes we laugh at things we normally wouldn't because it's better to laugh than cry. The state of the world is fucked up right now.

[–][deleted] 29 insightful - 4 fun29 insightful - 3 fun30 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I completely understand your point of view. What I'm doing is a bit immature but hey. I'm not there to harass anyone, mostly lurking with an occasional post or reply.

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am sure some joined here too and are doing the same thing. There have been some familiar sounding trolls

[–][deleted] 26 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Most of those super mods are transwomen, not women. They're the ones outright banning women and women's subs.

[–]Marsupial 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're not really silencing women in that sub considering posters are pre-dominantly men. I don't have any crisis of conscience about provoking, silencing or challenging men who objectify and fetishize women's existance and get actual women's spaces shut down.

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

They're going to get nuked, as will r/conservative, r/JoeRogan, r/JordanPeterson, r/namethatproblem

I wonder what will happen if they actually nuke the celebrity subs, or if they'll keep them up for fear of male backlash-- because the power mods obviously like the men.

[–]BuboTitan 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

r/againsthatesubreddits is now basically at war against r/conservative and report every post and most comments there as "hate". They never liked that sub before, but after the previous ban wave, they now see it as the next target that must fall. It will be interesting to see what happens now. A lot of people from the banned subs migrated to r/conservative, so Reddit would like to nuke it. On the other hand, if they get rid of that sub they will lose a hell of a lot of users, and it will look too obvious as if they are pushing a political agenda.

[–]luckystar 14 insightful - 8 fun14 insightful - 7 fun15 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Tbh, just keep pushing their logic to its natural conclusion. Post an image of two burly gay men in a loving embrace. "This is my girlfriend and I, we are valid lesbians too, transphobes get out". Call anyone who questions you a TERF.

[–]Marsupial 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

There's a coordinated effort right there to upvote the TiMs, trans threads are very upvoted and there are several obviously fake threads like "Omg, I love trans women, I never realized how great they were because I hadn't met one in person". Plus that whole place is full of male sexuality, lots of talking about top/bottom, posting pictures of women as objects, gross sexualizing posts that are perfectly in line with the sexual fetishization of stereotypes of femininity...

[–]hufflepuff-poet 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly! I was just lurking in actuallesbians and it's such a masculine space it's physically uncomfortable! The way they talk about women and being a lesbian is completely different then how truelesbians was. TL actually had discussions about women's struggles dating and accepting themselves and posts about dating and girlfriends and femme/butch dynamics never felt objectifying but on AL it feels like a bunch of straight guys playing at their idea of lesbians, based on anime, porn and "kweer kid" cartoons. I can't relate to the majority of the posts or posters there.

[–]LoganBlade 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)


not really aye

[–]AntiPorn 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've decided to go there undercover and participate like everyone else.

You must be very mentally strong to pull this off.

[–]optimistic_dyke 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It is pretty funny, they're so disconnected from reality and what " evil TERFs" think that I don't doubt they're accusing other TIMs of being one of us and harassing them, I don't think anyone there caught up with the fact there's pretty much no real lesbians going there seriously lol Also, imagine having such a peachy life that shit like this is super worrying, dude get a fucking life or an actual hobby

[–]beereadit 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Ah the actualnotlesbians subs, let them suck each other girldick to oblivion.

[–]LoveNotPorn 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I left a comment under that thread earlier today pretending to be part of their angry mob against "teh terfs."

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Stalking this subreddit" These aren't intelligent people considering that in order to find this post in the first place, they would have to stalk OUR sub in order to find it.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It was only a matter of time! Let the games begin

[–]MarkJefferson 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Serves them right. Now they have no control over all the communities they caused to be exiled. Papa Spez can't track their activity or plans or manipulate their speech with vague arbitrary rules and expectations. Some big subs that Reddit drove off to create their own sites are now coming back months later to haunt the cancel crowd, as they can easily strike from the shadows however they want. The paranoia's only going to grow and consume them over time. Get your popcorn.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I see what you did there. ;) Good. Plant seeds of doubt in them and watch them slowly unravel. They will start accusing other TRAs of being terfs. The best way to get under their skin and shake things up is to silently let them know we still exist. You don't even have to participate or comment, your mere presence is enough to make them furious.

[–]yishengqingwa666 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a load of morons.

[–]Capnmath 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That place is just a big circle jerk at this point anyway

[–]aqrylix 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

transactual lesbians

[–]LeyMio 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They should be called "r/actualmisogynists". That sub is completely garbage full of creepy balding men who fascinate forcing lesbians to have sex with them.