Anyone else annoyed by how hypocritical trans and gender fluid people are?

submitted by lskdfldskjkldsjf from self.GenderCritical

I'm tired of being told that biological men are women and that they belong in women's spaces. Then I will see biological women who identify as non-binary and call themselves lesbians or are in female spaces, and that's somehow ok too. Like they can't even keep their own ideology straight??? Why are non-binary people allowed in female only spaces? Why can they identify as lesbians if they don't even identify as women?? Nothing about this movement makes sense, if you don't identify as "cis" then basically you're free to do whatever the fuck you want and people will get offended if you question the lack of logic.

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]loveSloane 40 insightful - 4 fun40 insightful - 3 fun41 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I don’t think there’s anything that trans/nb/fluid people claim that they don’t contradict two seconds later. Nothing they say makes sense to me.

[–]lskdfldskjkldsjf[S] 28 insightful - 4 fun28 insightful - 3 fun29 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I'm so tired of it. I constantly see people say (in reference to a woman who is on testosterone and has a hairy body) "you really would call someone with a hairy chest and facial hair a woman? That looks like a man to me." and then they will turn around say a man in a dress with an obvious bulge and facial hair is a woman. Like BITCH WHAT?

[–]materialrealityplz 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol, it is weird. Transwomen are women so that's why they can be lesbians (according to them, this is obviously bullshit), but women who don't identify as women are also lesbians? lolz. kay.

[–]itsnotaboutewe 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why do females who identify as NB still get to play on women's sporting teams when they don't identify as women?

[–]divingrightintowork 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah this never made sense, really - but it only makes less sense now.

[–]assignedcopatbirth 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know there's not much evidence for this, but I strongly suspect the non-binary "identity" is based on trauma, specifically dissociative trauma.

The huge amount of cognitive dissonance it takes for a woman to call herself a "they/them lesbian" is staggering and confusing. Nobody is that stupid, and nobody has a rewarding reason to lie about it, like money or fame. I guess the little amount of clout/woke points you get would be attractive to a borderline personality, but that loops back to trauma again, doesn't it?

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Unless you identify as pikachu, then you are suddenly mocking them but mocking women is just fine and dandy.

[–]sisterinsomnia 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The category 'women' is not allowed to have any boundaries. Or at least those boundaries are not allowed to be decided by women. The goal is to make the word meaningless. It almost is already.

When people talk about 'inclusiveness' this is what really is behind it.

[–]TurtleFuzz 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What I don't understand is "non-binary trans women". I thought the whole point of being trans was to more closely associate yourself with the opposite sex. Then why would you also say "I also don't identify as either gender"?? So frickin dumb

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This mindset doesn't make sense to me either, and it still won't make sense because it's fucking insanity.