WHYYYYYYYYYY

submitted by Beth-BR from thetempest.co

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]kalina 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is insulting to Joan of Arc. I'm pretty fucking sure she would have laughed at someone calling her nonbinary. She had more important shit to do.

Interesting also that the only examples they name were women. Women in power? Can't be, must have been secretly men or at least not 100% female.

[–]MezozoicGay 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting also that the only examples they name were women.

Because there were no-one who can qualify as TiM. Women in those societies were restricted by law to do a lot of stuff, in most cases women were counted just as property. So obviously no man would take "a women's role". It is seen even nowadays - transgenderism is appearing only in countries where women fought their rights and are on decently equal footing with men (not exactly equal, but much closer than in other societies).

While for women to do anything it was just impossible, so they were needed to either be great exception and hold huge support of masses or rich aristocracy, or they were forced to pretend they are a man (as otherwise they'd be executed or put in jail for doing "not women's work").

And in general, main troubles from transideology is coming from TiMs, while TiFs are ignored even by their own kind.

[–]VioletRemi 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You did not know? Every strong or smart woman of the past is either non-binary or transman. Because being strong and smart is men's gender identity! So if woman is like that, it means she is of the opposite gender! And you ever saw woman wearing pants? Such women are all non-binary, as women can only walk around in skirts or dresses, and women must love pink color and dolls.

[–]assignedcopatbirth 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought it was a mortal sin to assume someone's gender identity? 🙄 Because it's your own personal truth and has nothing to do with anything?? Why is it cool to posthumously label historical figures then?

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Funny how the TRAs get their panties in a bunch when you use the wrong pronouns, yet in this article the author has no problem calling the clearly female Joan of Arc a "they".