all 8 comments

[–]questioningtw 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They are just pretending to be obtuse, it is obvious why we don't like the word cis.

[–]lefterfield 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, I dunno. I've argued with some of them before, I can believe they're that dense. And if they were capable of empathizing with women, they wouldn't be TRAs.

[–]nautilistic 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I'm going to call myself a unicorn dragon and anyone who doesn't identify as a unicorn will be called "snurfx".

"Are the snurfx people okay? I wish snurfx would just let me be who I need to be. The snurfx have their own space, why can't I get mine?"

Is that how this works?

[–]LeaveAmsgAfterBeep 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

My partner once got into an argument with a couple of their allies once who proceeded to tell her she was intolerant for not accepting people’s dragonkin identities, and hetsplain to her that as a lesbian she should be more inclusive.

[–]zephyranthes 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did anyone ask them why they don't like t-slurs?

[–]eddyelric 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why wouldn't we want to be clear? Why wouldn't strive for the topsy-turvy philosophy of post-structuralism?

[–]Shesstealthy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"EVERYONE should be able to have their identity recognised and in language that is acceptable to THEM! Not you, cis scum."

[–]diapason 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. In order to understand why we get upset at the term "cis" they'd have to actually have an understanding that sex stereotypes are oppressive to women, and they don't really think sexism is real or bad so they don't get it