I have lost so much respect for Nature, which has made clear that it will publish anything for "impact". Journals like Nature with high impact factors have higher rates of journal retractions than journals with lower impact factors. Some people believe that it's because journals with high impact factors are more widely read, are more likely to respond to claims of errors, and publish more "risky" content anyway. Others suggest that the prioritization of impact incentivizes researchers to exaggerate the claims of their work or even commit research fraud to push a certain narrative. The link is to an editorial, not a research article, but I still think it's inappropriate for Nature to publish this.