The Emperor's New Clothes: Levine edition

submitted by our_team_is_winning from self.GenderCritical

I need to vent. Thanks in advance if you let me.

I read that it's this Thursday when "Rachel" Levine in his costume will sit down in front of the Senate and these middle aged men (some women) will keep straight faces and play along with the "emperor's fine rainments. Only a fool could not see his beautiful clothes" -- and nobody will shout out "oh what the HELL!?" and they will use FEMALE pronouns for this thief of womanhood. They will just focus on whether or not he supports transing children (he does) and pretend he's not INSANE.

I get if a man says "I like wearing dresses. I'm a man who likes makeup. I'm a man who thinks heels are fun." Ok, that's unusual, but the "I'm a MAN who...." is the key issue here.

For a man to claim "I'm a woman and a qualified medical doctor," we are being played.

I wish I could hand deliver "The Emperor's New Clothes" to every member of the Senate. Of course, they might just have me arrested for "domestic terrorism" in this new Stalinist regime. And they wouldn't read it anyway. You can't reach the Woke.

How long until the minority of us (I want to believe we're the majority, but we're not being heard as such) are just labeled "hysterical" and hauled away, maybe for lobotomies (it wasn't that long ago it happened routinely) for acknowledging Reality?

Biden seems to have chosen "trans WOC" as his pet project. For a while I thought the whole world was surely laughing at us, but then I learned about "Petra" de Sutter and how high up he is in Europe, and he's a gynecologist as an added kicker. [You hid your transgender identity for years. Was it to protect yourself? What has been the most difficult part of your transition?

"I’ve always been a woman, people just didn’t see it. "

https://feministeerium.ee/en/petra-de-sutter/]

Apparently much of the world is on board with this.

I think we've all had men talk down to us our whole lives. Now we have men playing dress up and talking down to us to tell us what a woman is. It will be a cold day in hell before I call a man "she." And it means I will lose my job. We have reached the point we'd rather have women unable to pay their bills than stand up to men's sexual fetishes.

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]linda_senora 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The worst part is the idiotic women who along with this.

Is it too gullible of me to think that if more women in positions of power spoke up about this nonsense (the way JK Rowling did), we might stand a better chance?

[–]BEB 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That would be every female Democrat in Congress and many female politicians on the state and local level too.

I hope they burn in hell, or rather, I hope that they get trapped in a locked bathroom stall for all eternity with one of the "women" whose sexual demands they seem to think are worth more than our human rights.

[–]adungitit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If that happened, they'd just keep repeating the "transwomen are women" mantra while suffering from what happened and being unable to use public bathrooms any more. Women wouldn't be where they are if they weren't brainwashed to always put male needs above their own, even when this directly lowers their quality of life and removes their freedoms and safety.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those women are traitors. They don' t believe that shit any more than we do, but they are willing to play along for whatever benefit (money, headpats or power) they can get. They can really go fuck themselves. Looking at you Kamala Harris as well.

[–]our_team_is_winning[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

We'd definitely stand a better chance if more women spoke up, especially high-profile women and women in power. I can't understand how they are all compromised.

[–]linda_senora 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

When the man named Sophie died a few weeks ago, I learned he had worked for/with Madonna.

I keep thinking that many high profile women in the arts have encountered trans identified males in the past and thought those men were cool or edgy. I guess artists want to be seen as edgy. Others have worked with TIMS who have not been completely horrendous to these famous women, so the latter cannot see why anybody else would be antagonistic to these TIMs.

I bet Laverne Cox has not been an ass to the women he worked with, he has to conceal that side of himself.

I also bet that women who have worked with the likes of Morgane Oger or Clymer are fearful of reprisals. Those two are particularly vile, they would threaten anybody who dared to disagree with them.

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think most TiMs out their crazy very fast. But younger women have been so propagandized by Queer Theory, Gender Studies, etc., in school, and the deluge of TiM-affirming entertainment/media content that's been forced on us the last 10 or so years, they won't even acknowledge the crazy to themselves, much less become an outcast by voicing their doubts.

[–]adungitit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only thing that will happen is that it will now be taken as evidence of "women doing it, too! Women are just as creepy and strong as men are! See?". Because liberal feminism isn't about protecting women, it's about gaslighting that the problems women are dealing with aren't happening since everyone should be treated equally.

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We're not the only ones who've noticed that Empress Rachel has no clothes (and that he's a puberty blocker advocate) And the Democrats call themselves the "Party of Science":

Yes, Biden’s HHS Pick Advocates Puberty Blockers, Medical Transition Of Minors

"...Pre-pubescent children do not receive medical treatment, Levine said. But as soon as a gender confused child starts puberty, they could be given puberty blockers so they “never go through the wrong puberty...”

At around ages 14-16, Levine said, minors can start cross-gender hormones. Most surgical treatments start at age 18, added Levine, carving out some exceptions for surgical transitions at an earlier age."

https://www.dailywire.com/news/yes-bidens-hhs-pick-advocates-puberty-blockers-medical-transition-of-minors?%3Futm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwtwitter

[–]eddyelric 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I never want to hear "my side supports science" or "right side of history" for the rest of my life.

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you have time, please call your Senators tomorrow (Wednesday) and say NO to Rachel Levine and NO to the Equality Act.

Please call your congress house rep too because the House Equality Act vote is on Thursday!

People are calling, mostly conservatives, but we all need to do our part.