all 26 comments

[–]EventideSky 22 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 0 fun23 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I've heard you'll get your account permanently suspended if you post Glinner's substack articles about him. I'm just hoping for the Streisand effect. He really shouldn't be in a position of authority where minors are hanging out.

[–]CastleHoward 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm posting on every sub until they ban me.

[–]SharpTomorrow 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Reddit admins certainly go to great lengths to protect their pedo friends.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This isn't just a Reddit thing, its a Conde Nast (majority owner) thing.

You see it with their other subsidiaries as well, Exhibit A via Teen Vogue: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Advance Communications, which owns Conde Nast, and is the major shareholder of reddit, also publishes Allure, Architectural Digest, Bon Appétit, Condé Nast Traveler, GQ, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, Vogue and Wired.

And in digital form only, Ars Technica, Backchannel, Epicurious, Glamour, Pitchfork , them., Teen Vogue, Self , Love and La Cucina Italiana.

So it's no wonder that trans is being pushed by once-venerated mags likeThe New Yorker and that Glamour keeps giving TIMs its "woman of the year award."

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know there also a sizable investment in Reddit from Tencent - a Chinese state-owned (i.e. CCP-owned) media corp. There is a decent push coming from that angle as well in order to destabilize western power structures.

[–]CastleHoward 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That guys going to end up in jail eventually. He is definitely a nonce.

[–]GConly[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah that's my feeling. He'll do something, or someone will hack his hard drive and he'll get arrested.

You'd think he'd give the spotlight a miss.

[–]EveSerpent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That’s asking the impossible of a young male narcissist.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The demented father is rape-torturing a 10 year old to death in the attic over a period of weeks, and this dude is really trying to sell the idea that he had no idea it was happening while living under the same roof, because "the attic was dad's space".

Every day I think Big Tech execs can't get any more ideologically-depraved in their underground motivations, and yet here we are.

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not clear whether Aimee was living in the home at the time. IIRC, after the Challenor father was found guilty of animal abuse and neglect, and the house was found to be a filthy pig sty and hoarders' stash, Ashton (now Aimee) and the other kids came under state care - and were removed for a time, then were in and out of care for years. Apparently, the family was under child protection orders and scrutiny since the eldest kid was 2 weeks old.

http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2018/there-was-no-privacy-in-that-house/

IIRC, Ashton as a teenager also came under state care after he made a bomb threat to blow up a big mall/shopping center. There used to be information, including press coverage, of Ashton's bomb threat, but it all seems to have been removed from the internet under the UK & EU's "right to be forgotten" provisions.

[–]CastleHoward 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think the child was eventually rescued but obviously all the men in the house were aware if not participating. There were no women in the house.

[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I believe Ashton/Aimee's mum might have been in residence at the time, though perhaps not there that day/week. She and her husband have married each other twice, and my understanding is that she has remained steadfast and loyal to him throughout all the abuse.

But perhaps when the dad committed the kidnapping, rape and torture of this particular poor little girl, the mum was elsewhere. She has physical and mental illnesses, so might have been away for care, or just away coz she and hubby were temporarily separated at the time.

This is a very troubled family.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There were no women in the house.

Yep. This needs to be blasted out on full decibels, because the torrent of Redditools referring to the individual as "she" has blown through my annual tolerance for cognitive dissonance already.

[–]SanityIsGC 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I read that it was Aimee Chanellor who got r/gendercritical and r/detrans shut down. Since Graham Lineham's article about Aimee Chanellor's husband,Nathaniel Dean Knight can't be mentioned on reddit without the a sub getting banned like r/ukpolitics, would it be a good to keep posting all these names so people looking for answers about the banning will discover gender critical on saiddit?

[–]Vari4 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I found a lot of useful information on his wikipedia "talk" page (a page used by wikipedia editors to talk about the article they are editing)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Aimee_Challenor#Unprovoked_bans_on_Reddit

This lead to his own user page on wikipedia (where he is an editor)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AimeeSunflower

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, that first link is a good example of why I gave up on Wikipedia. One of the editors says straight out that he doesn't care if something is true, only that it comes from a "reliable" news source. So even though Aimee & reddit itself have said Aimee is a recently-hired administrator, the wiki editors won't take that as fact. It's only factual if it's been reported by a news organization.

Moreover, these wiki guys seem to have no idea that what the UK Spectator is or how many hundreds of years it's been in operation. Yes, it's conservative and it runs lots of opinion pieces. But it's very well-regarded and reliable. The reporting that it's done on trans issues over the past several years by excellent journalists like James Kirkup is top-notch.

Finally, the wiki guys seem to have no idea that the Aimee Challenor story was covered in the UK press in real time and widely discussed on Mumsnet and documented by all sorts of people doing independent journalism. Such as Sonia Poulton.

The Wiki guys further don't seem to know that the Green Party hired the independent investigation company Verita to do a full investigation of the debacle of Aimee and the Greens, and Verita published an extensive official report that was damning of the Greens and of Aimee alike. Veritas concluded not just that Aimee didn't have a clue about safeguarding; they said Aimee is incapable of understanding the concept.

Full Verita report: https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/9910/view/GNP001003.pdf

Executive summary of Verita report: https://www.verita.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/green-party-report-web-publication.pdf

Some news coverage:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/12/green-party-failed-to-properly-investigate-child-abuser-report

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-46838540

Statements from Verita regarding Green Party's response to its report:

https://www.verita.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Publication-of-our-report-following-an-independent-investigation-into-the-Green-Party.pdf

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ooooh, great sleuthing.

[–]filbs111 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

They even shut the thread in baduk! https://xa.reddit.com/r/badunitedkingdom/comments/mb0xnc/ukpol_shut/

interesting:

https://xa.reddit.com/r/badunitedkingdom/comments/mb2gqj/no_more_links_or_comments_until_morning/

Anyone have the source material about "...the person, the person's relatives, the person that wrote about those people, link to that blog, or link to the weekly politics magazine. Or previous news stories that mention the person in the Guardian, Indy, Times, Mirror, Order-order, Huffpost, etc." ?

I wonder to what degree this has to do with UK law. Is there some ongoing court case?

[–]GConly[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nope, just one power mad probably pedo TIM.

This guy is so shady, and he's modding children's subs. I mean associating with pedos doesn't mean you are one, but most non pedos are repulsed by them.

This is a recipe for disaster.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a recipe for disaster.

Who's got popcorn?

[–]TheBeefBenson 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They've just wiped bad uk and made it private. It's locked and all my comments have been deleted. That was the only sub I routinely visited.

Update: jannies are just looking it for the night because people might post the peado supporter's name.

[–]GConly[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is red pilling a lot if the mainstream over there as to how OTT the censorship is getting.

[–]filbs111 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No need to wean yourself off reddit. They did it for us!

[–]SanityIsGC 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

UK Politics: Did a paedophile influence children's policies? - eye-opening video by independent journalist Sonia Poulton about the Challenor family and Aimee's fast rise in the Green Party and British politics more generally:

https://youtu.be/bHk_tdn-ga0 YouTube YouTube