all 4 comments

[–]ralph 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wasn't #BelieveHer always bullshit anyway? #BelieveHerIfShe'sCallingOutMenWeDisagreeWithPoliticallyOtherwiseSweepItUnderTheRug

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it was always that. It's ok if the man supports political positions they like is what it seems like.

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Still the Patriarchy…

It’s always been “all women who disagree should be” {repercussions}

BelieveHer wasn’t an action, it was a sound bite.

I promote to always first ask the question, “And how does this impact women/girls?” Demand an answer.

ETA. This is why our right to name ourselves as women/female is So important.

[–]Finnegan7921 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was ok when it was just Al Franken being the lone casualty on the left; Weinstein was gross and he could be lost with no real issue...when the list began to mount and it was full of people they actually liked...well then....shit changed up pretty damn quickly. The Biden thing was hilariously predictable. Harris is wishing Tara Reade waited a year so she could generate enough of a groundswell to force him out. All of those creepy pics and videos of him would be nonstop viral from the KHive to put her in the oval office, but since the media already declared all of that perfectly legit in order to get Biden over the finish line, they won't do anything now.