you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if this was actually some measure of retaliation from the FBI against 8chan for identifying them for their honeypot operations.

How do you know 8ch isn't all FBI driven in the first place? What even makes you think it's FBI and not CIA?

There are some within the FBI who are there to protect the pedos.

As there are some who use 'free speech' to post CP.

The owner of 8ch just released a statement: https://twitter.com/infinitechan/status/1158688643856420869 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKPdbEAmWGE explicitly stating how they work together with the FBI.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

How do you know 8ch isn't all FBI driven in the first place? What even makes you think it's FBI and not CIA?

Good point. Who's to say?

In that case, are you going to support Cloudflare's attempt to kick your FBI buddies off of their platform?

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

My FBI buddies?

Resorting to name calling is low and I don't see how my first reaction: https://saidit.net/s/Internet/comments/vva/cloudflare_terminates_service_for_8chans/1j26 would change significantly if it was any TLA's honeypot.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

What? That's not name calling.

Do you have something against the FBI?

Don't you do your sleuthing thing?

[–]Mnemonic 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Insinuating I work with/for the FBI for apparently no reason: name calling

Politicians sometimes resort to “name calling” during political campaigns or public events with the intentions of gaining advantage over, or defending themselves from, an opponent or critic. Often such name calling takes the form of labelling an opponent as an unreliable and untrustworthy quantity, such as use of the term "flip-flopper".

And of course another insinuation out of the blue:

Don't you do your sleuthing thing?

Do elaborate.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Insinuating I work with/for the FBI for apparently no reason: name calling

Oh, that's rich, given you said:

Trolling is never encouraged as it is by definition retarded.

which insinuates that you were calling me a retard, since I'd said that I trolled.

hypocrisy, anyone?

[–]Mnemonic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes the act of trolling is retarded:

  • You read this as me saying "You're a retard"

  • I mean this: You acted retarded and this is not encouraged.

Reading Comprehension.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The difference between insinuation and reading comprehension is...

Whatever the hell you want it to be, am I right, because god forbid you admit your own faults

[–]Mnemonic 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No you're not right and if you read it all back it will become clear:

You accuse me of a lot while I stand by 'Trolling is retarded and not encouraged'.

You try to twist my words every which way to either claim:

  • I'm personally attacking you and calling you a retard

  • standing above it all like it doesn't matter, while I actually try to minutely type it all out for you how I Think and why I think that about trolling

  • and now as someone with apparently no self reflection but with faults, because you don't know what 'reading something in the context' (reading comprehension) and 'name calling' (insinuating) are to the point of trying to compare the two while one is a skill and the other is a politicians trick.

I really thought I spelled it out clearly here: https://saidit.net/s/Internet/comments/vva/cloudflare_terminates_service_for_8chans/1k1n

Instead of making an argument (if there is any) for trolling, you went the "I'm insulted route and some other guy (again which I have nothing to do with) also did a bad thingie".

I'm not saying you are a retard nor am I saying you're always trolling I just (again and again) state my case against trolling while defending myself against your accusations.

[–]IamRedBeard 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

This guy has been harassing me for days and I have said, if not verbatim, almost exactly some of what you have said here. I told him over and over and over again I dont wish to debate him because of similar things you typed, and also my own reasons.

He will NOT go away and he tried to sick the site owner on me. (who said I was doing no wrong BTW)

The only thing you can do is not engage.

Good luck.

If you would like to see the thread and make your own judgments, Here: https://saidit.net/s/AntiTrumpAlliance/comments/w9n/us_news_elderly_couple_found_dead_in_apparent/

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do elaborate.

Piqued your curiosity, eh? ;-)

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, just calling out your bullshit ;)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

BTW, I agree with what you do, and I appreciate that people like yourself are out there fighting the good fight.

Just saying.... :-)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know that you know, that I know. :-p