Now that we know transmission risk is reduced but not eliminated with vax.
And arrival of Omicron escaping vax coverage more.
It creates a real question about utility of vaccine passports - and 3rd dose of original Wuhan variant as requirement by certain countries.
Which some on twitter are mentioning as one reason for governmental pursuit of strategies which no longer seem sensible.
While there have been multiple conspiracy theories about the role of billionaires and their influenced organizing the show (epidemiologists and bureaucrats - and zero early treatment doctor input) - Melissa Ciummei hypothesizes that the European enthusiasm for control and vax passports is a prelude to digital currency and social credit systems.
What are opinions on this thesis?
Does it explain the nonsensical adherence of policymakers to strategies that make little sense - for example voluntary compliance vs mandated compliance. Normally voluntary or motivated compliance where people feel it is a voluntary decision works best. Yet now there seems to be a willingness to engage tools of coersion - which seems like a strategy which will fail. So why keep insisting on it?
My own simplified explanation is given below.
Video:
https://youtu.be/MlEswbeQNPg
The pandemic will end when the digital monetary system is in place
Nov 27, 2021
Melissa Ciummei, a financial investor from Northern Ireland, has serious concerns that injection passports will be used more like data passports to control participation in society. She believes the passport system was manufactured to bring about a financial reset, replacing our failing fiat currency system. Trillions of dollars are owed to banks and there's no way to pay it back. Because passports are crucial for the implementation of this new financial system, mandatory vaccination of all citizens, young and old, will be imperative for the plan to succeed. Tune in to this in-depth interview for an insight into the economics at play behind the c19 narrative. To prevent this new system from being introduced all people need do is not comply.
For more see https://thebuzz.nz
My own take
Yesterday Alexander Marinos held a Twitter Space - discussion forum where the topic was the trends towards authoritarianism (Australia), the reasons for how the public seems blindsided and seems unable to understand what's happening to them. And focus was on public confusion, depression etc.
And there was a certain degree of philosophizing.
I sent some comments to Alexandros - and I will repeat these here - for what I think is a more constructionist explanation for what is happening.
In mathematics there can be an existential proof - where you prove something can exist, but provide no mechanism to how to find it.
While there can be a constructionist proof of something - where you demonstrate something by actually explaining how it works, or how to find it.
In a similar vein, I hope my explanation is a more basic or core one.
It is not my own - but is essentially the understanding of it that the early treatment doctors or those in support of early treatment have proposed - that the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) is one part of it.
I have tried to make it into a more neutral mechanistic process - which may explain why certain groups in society have lost the ability to influence - while other groups have multiplied their ability to influence.
Normally this is reserved for "the truth" or consensus in normal-time somewhat-in-equilibrium society - but in a time of tumult like now where the reality of the pandemic changes according to every new day's data - the reigns of decision-making seem to be in fewer hands (often a compulsion of a war-like emergency situation). But the odd thing in this war is that those having that decision-making power are making every move the wrong move ie time unravels each decision's correctness.
For example the WHO/CDC/NIH have been wrong about everything - and the FLCCC right about everything:
The FLCCC has been right on (when the CDC/NIH has been wrong on these - and later reversed):
Right now the FLCCC has a better track record on these matters, since they practically deal with patients.
And examine the data neutrally - what is best for patients - rather than according to how to angle for a certain behavioral response from the public (for example lying about the utility of masks at the outset in order to salvage PPE stocks for healthcare workers - to avoid a run on them by the public). That bit of engineering has set the stage for what has followed.
In any case, here are what I wrote to Alexander Marinos on twitter as my take on the conundrums of this time they were discussing (ie why are concerns and valid ideas not getting air in media - censorship - and the near worldwide alignment of these moves).
My comments to Alexander Marinos addressing the Twitter space discussion
https://twitter.com/alexandrosM/status/1467543641967132674?t=DHIbnqJWMKdQQODlYgfP-w&s=19
Alexandros Marinos
This week's DYOR is live at 9.30am PT as always! https://t.co/588iJvZj10
A more constructionist examination would view how a jury of peers make a decision
And we are assuming that all
are equal or starting at same time in discussion
Yet what if 20pct of the jury had been in discussion among themselves how they will deal with jury duty
That is what has happened
It is what happens in war with armies/generals stepping in with pre-planned strategies - which is not understandable to the average public (because they spent last few years doing other stuff - and they are few years behind in ability to advise or participate in the debate)
Similar situation is now - except not the military - but epidemiologists (for whom this is a career windfall) - and beyond that the infrastructure of commercial medicine - and administrator driven hospitals balancing commercial interest and being not-doctors but operating as administrators in the political/influence universe
So it is not just corrupt doctors - but the pre-existing structure of medicine
They too are informed by institutional/professional society (peer) established behavior
So what has happened is pandemic elevated a professional society of medicine become overweighted in influence over still-not-prepared public
And epidemiologists - esp those linked in to the influence networks already in place - are exercising oversized weight - even over clinicians
So right now early treatment doctors dont have a position at the table
Those who have treated patients are zero weighted - and those who are bureaucrats and epidemiologists - already knew from prior pandemic exercises know "how to deal with misinfo" and how to deal with challenges - so things stay on track
The problem is this does not include new info - as early treatment doctors have emerged, treatments have emerged - near zero deaths in thousands of patients
And the people at the table - are unwilling to allow such distraction - and the possible loss of their primacy at that table (as they are used to dealing with subservient doctors in the field - and now with early treatment doctors are those who are too aggressive for them - are too confident and ready for a leadership position at that table)
And the media management (possibly anticipated in their pandemic exercises would be needed for derailing challenges)
And the social media censorship
These are essential in order to maintain the initial early advantage of the synched/prepared - all those who are clued into the earlier pandemic exercises
That advantage will fade over time - and which is why censorship and "fact checking" is required to maintain that disparity between those at the decisionmaking table - and those who are not yet at that table (like early treatment doctors)
Early treatment doctors being the most grounded to reality - as they deal with patients - they see there can be zero deaths if treated early
The reason the hospitals turn away mild who become the severe of next week (vicious cycle) is because they have preexisting decisionmakers in place who cannot fathom thinking beyond narrow focus or their hospital issue
Basically during crisis there is no process to allow new more competent leaders (who naturally rise to top by demonstrating better handle on things)
The pre-existing Trusted News Initiative (TNI) and media participating in previous pandemic exercises (which may have included how to handle new entrants)
And this is why despite being in war, new better generals are not being identified - because all new thoughts are seen as potentially derailing old ideas of how to handle pandemic
That planning didnt include emergence of early treatment - zero deaths by all early treatment doctors who have treated 4000 patients each
To understand the current situation requires less why the public is thinking one way (since they are sucker punched and stunned by the time disadvantage they have had in preparing - like the unclued members of that jury)
And people need to think more about how those at the decisionmaking table are thinking
That is start thinking as a leader
We are in a period of tumult - and people's expectation of logic, and static dynamics ie things will balance out - truth will emerge - consensus will emerge
That is delayed when during pandemic info is restricted - for example r/ivermectin was attacked by 910 sub-reddits to force reddit to shut it down
Similar things happening with pressuring doctors and all over - while FDA getting positive press on horse dewormer tweet - this creates a gradient against info balancing things out
And delays the balance/consensus that the public expects would have emerged by now if it exists
Essentially those who were already at the table - have a time advantage - which active members of the public cannot surmount as easily
As media now not taking up new trends or new ideas positively - as is signed up to Trusted News Initiatives (TNI)
there doesn't seem to be anything here