sonnenrad
De-Liberation, art of the Jew
Example Case: Cass R. Sunstein as expressed in The Law of Group Polarization 1999 pdf (Chicago law school publication), and same title, Journal of Political Philosophy 2002.
In a striking empirical regularity, deliberation tends to move groups, and the individuals who compose them, toward a more extreme point in the direction indicated by their own pre-deliberation judgments.
For example, people who are opposed to the minimum wage are likely, after talking to each other, to be still more opposed; people who tend to support gun control are likely, after discussion, to support gun control with considerable enthusiasm; people who believe that global warming is a serious problem are likely, after discussion, to insist on severe measures to prevent global warming. This general phenomenon – group polarization – has many implications for economic, political, and legal institutions. It helps to explain extremism, “radicalization,” cultural shifts, and the behavior of political parties and religious organizations; it is closely connected to current concerns about the consequences of the Internet; it also helps account for feuds, ethnic antagonism, and tribalism. (the Jew has values opposed to tribalism (polarized groups, aka ethnic identity of Goyim), calling such tribal values "extreme", but Jews themselves are not a tribe, they are a 'special group', aka The Chosen.)
Normative implications are discussed, with special attention to political and legal institutions. (By "normative" the Jew means change the society to suit the Jew.)
The Jew wants "de-liberation" in the surrounding culture, to move it away from itself, toward some greater good for the Jews.
The Jew is not interested in de-liberation for Jews. Instead, for "economic, political, and legal institutions" of the Goy society in which the Jew is immersed (NOT assimilated). The Jew cannot accept the Goy perspective or mores, that would be to deny himself and his own ethnic group. So he tries to change the surroundings with Laws against Group Polarization. Such laws that favor: affirmative action, gun controls (restrictions on firearms), impeachment of the president, callous actions of corporations, feminism, Internet censorship, as per examples in the paper.
De-Liberation discussions are usually going to favor the Jew, because his ethnic group has exercised argument and debate as a cultural characteristic. In Yeshiva school boys vie for favor from the Reb with skill in juggling religious laws, their mental exercise. Winners get to be matched with the girls of the wealthier families in the neighborhood; thus the Jew's eugenic practices that have led to them having average 15 IQ point advantage over Goyim.
Another famous trait of the Jew is deception (aka lies).
Tribal Response: Sword of Elysium
It is words and ideas which the Jews put forth that are the ultimate battleground. The establishment exercises a ruthless control over words and ideas, however as we all know, ideas can’t be killed. And since words are not killed, the establishment has sought to excise (prohibit) words that go against its interests (aka 'hate speech'), by power of taboo; and then enshrining its own words, by the power of dogma. (The Jew always seeks to control the establishment, with deceptions, bribery, blackmail, sabotage, opposing establishment power, etc..)
sequel: De-Liberations of the Jews: Normalization of...
there doesn't seem to be anything here