Source:

FULL STREAM! Ep. 132 Rekieta v. YouTube; Parody to SCOTUS; Hunter Biden & MORE! Viva & Barnes! (2:23:29) ~ Viva Frei, Oct 10, 2022

YouTube auto-transcript:

38:18 This is Alex Jones trial and I was like oh I was waiting for Alex Jones to testify then I see your tweets and I'm like I didn't put two and two together until we we DM'd about it um you've got to explain the rationale what went on in that trial 8 billion what does that mean they're asking for like 100 million per plaintiff?

38:38 500 million

38:41 okay Robert let's let's give us the rundown Alex Jones decided not to testify and I think your justification

38:47 for why he didn't is not just sound but um fantastic but tell us that and then

38:53 tell us if you said 500 million is what they're asking per per plaintiff correct

38:58 so pretty much that trial went as we predicted that you would not find evidence of Alex Jones sending people to

39:05 stalk anybody you would not find any kind of they would not produce a single witness that connected Alex Jones to

39:11 anybody who harassed anybody at the families not one they've had years to develop it they couldn't produce one

39:16 single witness to support it that's been a big media lie from day one in fact I

39:22 didn't hear any witness testify that they connected them watching Alex Jones

39:27 say something and then thinking it was about them and them being upset or offended by it none of them testified they ever sent a timely retraction

39:34 correct uh uh motion or a request at all or correction or apology demand or

39:40 anything like that that I saw in the trial and and most of it it was people getting up talking about the horrible

39:46 tragedy of losing their child none of which has anything to do with Alex Jones and so the it's been a pure show trial

39:54 it's been a disgrace of a trial people have watched it thought it was even worse than I described it and 39:59

anticipated it pre-previewed it being and so Alex Jones had already testified early on in the proceedings where the

40:06 plaintiff's lawyer went nuts and was screaming yelling you know it was it was a circus it was a circus uh where the

40:11 where the ringleader is the judge uh and the and the lead clown is the plaintiff's lawyer and so Alex Jones was

40:18 going to testify on his own behalf as part of a defense but the judge made clear

40:23 that if he testified truthfully if he testified honestly he goes to jail for

40:31 as long as six months and so basically what happened is the judge was making clear to Norm patus uh Jones's lawyer

40:39 that he was basically being part put into a trap he was only going to be allowed to answer yes no or I don't know

40:46 and if the question didn't allow didn't didn't call for one of those three answers and he expounded it all

40:52 uh in a way that was truthful about a topic she said he can't talk about he goes to jail if he if uh he says yes no

41:00 or I don't know when that doesn't actually fit then they could charge him with perjury charges right so I mean no

41:06 matter what he he was it was a pure let's put Alex Jones back on the trial and see if we can put him in jail for

41:12 six months create more theater uh and punish him even further for a speech you'll remember the example you used

41:19 better than I can on uh your Barn's brief but you said like hypothetical example you've made 150 million dollars

41:25 off your false reporting on Sandy Hook do you feel bad about it like what was that how did you phrase a question yeah

41:31 well or just say you know the plaintiff's lawyer would ask questions I call them Senate questions because the Senate would always have like six cents

41:38 they always have six sub-component parts so there are questions you can't answer yes no or I don't know honestly or

41:43 truthfully and so in the place lawyer did this throughout early on it's like well with all your coverage on Sandy

41:49 Hook you didn't didn't you make x amount of money over five years well the gross revenues might be that

41:55 amount but not the net revenue so there's that issue and the other is has nothing to do with Sandy Hook San Diego is hardly ever covered however the judge

42:02 that specifically said you cannot tell the jury how little you covered Sandy Hook you cannot tell the jury that 99 of

42:09 what infor is published and broadcast rebutted the denier movement about Sandy Hook acknowledge that Sandy Hook

42:16 happened you cannot tell the jury how many times you apologize to the family your apology Stewart to her starting

42:22 with Joe Rogan many years ago you can't tell them that you can't tell them that you're in bankruptcy you can't tell them

42:29 uh a whole but you can't tell them that you didn't intend to harm anyone you can't tell them about other cases and

42:36 contacts in which you were PR which you were right when you exposed uh conspiracies that were in existence uh

42:43 so how does he answer that question if he says no plaintiff's lawyer says he 42:49

committed perjury he denied his company made x amount of money over six years if he's says yes he's lying because it's

42:56 not accurate because it has nothing to do with Sandy Hook if he tries to explain himself oh you you explained

43:01 you're that that you talked about something you can't talk about contempt six years six months in jail and so the

43:07 uh while he's going through this bankruptcy proceeding to keep everything alive at Infowars so it would it made

43:13 notice what they wanted him to do is get up there and read the script we told you to read and if you don't read the script

43:19 we told you to read you're going to jail period well that was no deal at all

43:24 uh you're a mute just so nobody thinks you're exaggerating Robert the judge proudly

43:32 loudly and on multiple occasions said I'll hold him in contempt right there on on the stand and contempt quasi-criminal

43:39 it can be a monetary fine or imprisonment and it was it there was no hiding it she was going to do it she was

43:45 gonna do it boy howdy but so so uh Paris after Jones was called in Chief says Okay I I renounce my right to

43:53 to cross-examine we'll call him in our defense how does he make the announcement to the jury or how does he

43:59 do it strategically so that the jury doesn't draw on negative inferences is there a way to do it there was no reason

44:04 for the jury to uh care one way or the other so the uh in that sense because he had already testified but he just told

44:11 the judge given what the what the judge put him in he you do what's called a proper you say here's what the testimony would have been if he was allowed to

44:18 actually testify truthfully and defend himself and the main goal was how do I testify truthfully given where the

44:25 judge's instructions it was it was clear testify truthfully go to jail first time

44:30 that's ever happened in America but that's what happened in the Alex Jones trial and so the the judge just said hey

44:35 the case is done and we'll go to closing arguments and jury instructions they are

44:41 allowing a massive uh punitive damage Risk by the way the amount of money they requested is not just punitive damages I

44:47 mean mean that they're uh in fact I don't think any of it's punitive damages they want fi incompensatory damages 500

44:54 million dollars for speech that they couldn't even identify concern them or that they ever

44:59 remember hearing that I heard from the witness stand so I mean maybe it was maybe it happened when I wasn't there

45:05 but I wasn't watching it because I didn't watch all did not watch all the trial but I I saw no evidence of that I

45:11 mean this is unheard of the average for people that are really have their reputations destroyed the average jury

45:17 verdict for defamation America is thirty thousand dollars and that's when they're actually talked about in their

45:22 reputation destroyed they were going 500 000 a piece eight billion eight billion

45:28 500 million Robert not 500 000. 500 million per person over eight billion

45:34 dollars it would be the largest Verdict by a quantity of over tenfold a

45:40 hundredfold it would be a hundred times more than the biggest verdict in the history of America that's how in the

45:46 history of the world that's how crazy this trial has become what a disgraced the rule of law it has become Robert I

45:54 mean I I was not not there we didn't see the jury but I mean what's their face

45:59 like I saw patis he did he did a great job in closing the Mad Maddie Maddie

46:05 it's not that I don't like the you know that I'm unsympathetic to the plaintiffs their lawyer uh really rubs me the wrong

46:13 way in demeanor in in everything his closing arguments were emotional Preposterous over the top but

46:21 not emotional in a justifiable sense emotional as in exploitive Pat is on the

46:27 other hand said look he was great says this is not a this is not a lottery this is not a pulling the arm let's just see

46:32 how much we land on but do you have any gauge as to how the jury was responding in closing if someone comes up there and

46:39 asks for 500 million dollars I say you you guys are a joke but what do you have

46:44 any indications that would be the reaction of the normal juror but this is Connecticut there's six jurors they have

46:50 to be unanimous um they uh they did not come to I think

46:55 they deliberated a whole day and came to no conclusion and they start back again on Tuesday uh but you know you have

47:02 Connecticut uh you have it's a very liberal Democratic jury pool they've seen a complete show trial uh how much

47:10 they understand that is a fully unknown so you know we'll find out you know typically in these kind of show trials

47:16 the jury goes along with they play their part in the theater so uh it's it's

47:22 pretty rare to for them to go against what they're kind of almost being forced to conclude

47:28 um and adjudicate uh but all it's just an insane just just sort of insane request it makes plaintiff's lawyers

47:35 look like a disgrace like ambulance chasing bottom of the barrel uh all the

47:41 caricatures and stereotypes fit uh the way in which this plane is firm is going about it but they're very politically

47:47 connected they shut down Remington for 73 million dollars they help cover up the corruption of the school system

47:53 because they did not pursue those cases in a timely manner at all the actual party responsible that could be held

48:00 responsible that was still around other than the shooter himself uh it was the

48:06 school system and the politicians but this politically connected firm didn't want to sue them the media didn't want

48:11 to talk about them and that helped facilitate frankly more school shootings down the road because people were

48:17 unaware of how bad some of our school safety protocols and procedures are which is now the grounds for the Uvalde

48:23 suit that has been filed in Texas um maybe that never happens if the truth

48:29 would have come out so I I did about three press conferences there with Alex Jones in Connecticut

48:34 um the local media was actually more respectful than the national media not a surprise there uh but you know it's a

48:40 it's a disgraceful show trial and there's still one more disgraceful show trial to happen in Texas yet so I mean

48:46 it's uh it's but the more outrage in the court of public opinion the better the chance that this show trial gets

48:53 overturned and we don't see its ugly face reappear in America two things actually but first one uh what's the

49:00 next one in Texas he already had one trial in Texas yeah this would be his second trial in Texas involving uh

49:06 another another uh set of Sandy Hook planes same same uh default verdict

49:12 circumstances oh yeah same judge same judge okay well that's great um and I just want everyone out there to

49:18 appreciate 500 million per plaintiff one of those plaintiffs was an FBI agent who

49:24 didn't have any children in Sandy Hook who was not physically injured just knows nobody who was physically injured

49:30 500 million 500 million 500 million all right Robert compensation

49:38 and by the way his testimony I did watch we watched it yep he didn't identify any statement he saw in live time from Alex

49:44 Jones about him at all ever worse worse than that in my humble opinion and I didn't even know this before watching

49:50 the evidence that plaintiffs deduced some of the statements and issues that he was complaining about actually arose

49:55 before Alex Jones even covered it at all correct from day one what he was

50:00 complaining about was coming from other people yes um okay the trial kept reaffirming they

50:06 kept talking about now what Alex Jones said or did it was about what somebody else said or did that they never tied into Alex Jones ever and you know this

50:13 is this is ugly theater show trial disgrace to America whatever you think about Alex Jones what do you think about

50:18 Sandy Hook it goes beyond the first and second amendment implications this is about them trying to set the precedent

50:24 just like PayPal set the precedent by going after Alex Jones for where they were going to ultimately try to go just

50:30 like Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube uh showed us where they were gonna go you know it starts with Alex

50:37 Jones it finishes with the president of the United States continues to the nickeracatas of the world uh this is an

50:43 attempt to see if they can get away with show trials and it's happening at a time where we're seeing the Biden Administration show no restraint at all

50:51 um which you know the the next two cases we have uh the the Humboldt case which we'll get through in a little bit

50:58 County seizing property without justification of any kind under a complete scam in Humboldt County uh but

51:04 also relates to uh what I witnessed this week in the uh Brooke Jackson case well you know even before we get there just

51:10 very quickly on the rayshard Brooks someone in the chat over at Rumble says and it's not a rumble rant I just I read

51:16 regular chat as well it says what's the rationale behind default verdicts because people are looking at Alex Jones

51:22 I made the analogy like Alex Jones is having less of a right to defend himself than Daryl Brooks not racial so I didn't

51:29 mean to be that was not a that was a innocent mistake Daryl Brooks who's defending himself and making a mockery

51:36 of the defense system but in allowing him to do so the system is retaining its

51:41 Integrity Alex Jones less of a right to defend himself than Daryl Brooks who ran over and killed killed six people ran

51:47 over many more uh civil versus criminal yes I appreciate that but Robert what's the rationale behind default verdict as

51:54 opposed to foreclosed from defending let the plaintiffs make their case in front of a jury nonetheless

51:59 so the right to trial by jury is what shapes all of this so there's a right under the Connecticut Texas Constitution

52:05 there's also arguably a right there's a writer of the Federal Constitution for federal trials and typically it is

52:12 considered enforceable in fact we'll discuss it in the Humboldt property case it's one of the issues it's an

52:17 enforceable due process and equal protection right under the 14th Amendment against States and so uh so default is not allowed in

52:25 criminal cases in my view it should not be allowed in civil cases default is in

52:31 fact what should happen is they should have a trial in front of a jury and if the plaintiff or whichever party just doesn't show up then that jury can

52:38 adjudicate accordingly but what we're seeing in the Jones case it's always been a dangerous tool which is judges

52:44 try to find excuses to eviscerate your trial jury rights they do so on three grounds default judgments motions to

52:51 dismiss and summary judgment proceedings it got so bad at summary judgment the U.S Supreme Court about two decades ago

52:58 had to clean it up because federal courts were just unilaterally doing it sometimes they try to do it through jury

53:04 instructions in criminal cases Court had the Supreme Court had to clear that up so but uh default judgment so my view is

53:11 defaults should never be allowed because it violates the right to trial by jury but to the the Court's current con I

53:17 mean and here's the problem it's courts reviewing their own power so to do courts want to sit there and say golly

53:23 gee we really don't have that power they're like oh yeah I think we do so that that's that's the problem it's

53:30 where our tripartite system of government falls apart at times and and so the default is called the

53:36 death penalty sanction in in places like Texas that's what's called the death penalty the death penalty is supposed to

53:42 be reserved for people who completely refuse to participate at any level and

53:48 as everybody who watched the now the Connecticut case saw in fact I was talking to the jury the journalist

53:54 outside was like tell me what piece of discovery that plaintiffs didn't get you've been watching the trial tell me they could not identify a single one why

54:02 is it nobody no nobody on the plaintiff side could identify a single piece of evidence they did not get from but Robert their argument is going to be

54:08 well we have it now but he didn't give it up when he had to so what I mean I mean default judgment is only death

54:14 penalty sanction is only when you are denied your ability to prove your case at trial because someone did not

54:21 participate in Discovery and even then it's supposed to be limited to that issue and they didn't there's no

54:27 connection between the issues she's talking about and the issue she issued a death penalty sanction on so it's just

54:33 an eviscerate it's an attempt to use misused and abuse judicial power to

54:38 circumvent your right to a trial by jury because they could not allow even in Liberal Connecticut they could not allow

54:44 Alex Jones to be able to defend himself and speak truthfully to the jury because they knew it would expose that their

54:50 so-called case about fake news is a fake case built on big media lies about what really happened and just so everybody

54:57 really appreciates what you just said that even that on which he let's just agree that he did default on it profits

55:03 uh Google analytics had nothing to do with the defamatory statements themselves and so incidental ancillary

55:10 and yet was it used as the as the codes for the nuclear option I mean again he

55:16 turned over more Discovery than any media defendant in history no but he didn't turn over one a challenge to find one case when I was

55:24 the journalist couldn't point out anything uh and I pointed out I mean some of them had been following in the

55:29 neighboring New York the cases against the New York Times brought by project Veritas and Sarah Palin I was like have

55:34 you ever heard of the New York Times turning over the kind of Discovery they're openly talking about in The Alex Jones trial that the plaintiff's half

55:40 yeah you know detailed financial information to the minute to the minute of when financial information of when

55:46 money was made to the minute and of course they couldn't connect Sandy Hook to that money they had the money to the

55:53 minute they couldn't say okay here's when he talked about Sandy Hook let's look at the Baseline of what his normal revenue is did it go up it didn't that's

56:00 why they didn't talk about it though they had that information so they knew their whole case was built on a big fat

56:06 fraud um that was blaming Alex Jones for things he was not responsible for that

56:11 he was not the person who did that he didn't make the money they claimed he did that he almost never talked about it et cetera they couldn't allow the people

56:18 to know the truth that's why they defaulted him and it's in it as even the Hartford current acknowledged it's an ex

56:25 quote the I think use words like extreme highly unusual et cetera this is liberal

56:30 Alex Jones hating media sources that love the Sandy Hook trials admitting

56:35 well you know what we've never really seen this before and what we saw at trial was further evidence that it was

56:41 built on a big lie