Mother and father, daughter, son, are illegal now

submitted by Elvira95Viva la figa from self.LGBDropTheT

[removed]
all 70 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to remove it. We oppose blanket banning any news source. Users have a responsibility to be skeptical, check sources, and comment on any flaws.

Users can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims - your link(s) can help all of our readers better understand this issue.

If anyone finds evidence that this article is false or misleading, please let the subreddit Moderators know by sending ModMail. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Archieved version to give no clicks: https://archive.is/JbRgQ

[–]GreykittymommaMagical lady 💜 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Glad I voted 3rd party. Fuck you Pelosi you old bitch!

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When catholic bigots of my country talked about gender ideology danger I though they were the usual exaggerated bigots, but not they're right

[–]SedateApe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Third party votes still got is one of the two old ones

[–]GreykittymommaMagical lady 💜 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wtf I hope you don't speak English because you're doing it wrong. I think I might get what you are trying to say but even that is stupid.

[–]SedateApe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You sounded like a transgender in your reply! You been practicing that for long...or does it just come naturally to you?

Letta mia speekita weelwee weelwee cwearwee den.. every third party vote in any election in the past (about) 100 years has gotten us only victories in the two major parties. That's math and that's truth.

Ross Perot is an excellent example! And whoever the third/fourth/fifth/etc parties that got votes this election...there was no chance anyone outside the Dems or Reps parties was going to win.

While it is every single person's right to cast their ballet as they seem fit....third party voters SHOULD loose all rights to complain for the next four years!

Too many, and I mean TOO MANY, people were preaching outside rallies and online and where ever a microphone/keyboard could be found. Most were saying "I liked Trump's policies but I don't like the man!"...fine. We should ONLY look at policies!

You think every fucker who held office before TV and radio was an angel? Or even a nice guy?

Policies run a country.

Is this any clearer now?

[–]Rosefield 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

I don't believe it. Is there any proof for this?

Edit: Wtf?? apparently it's true but I still hope it's not. Pls let it be fake.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1345086985246027780/photo/1

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I don't believe it. Is there any proof for this?

I'm dubious; all of the sources are right-wing ones-- nothing from the likes of reputable, mainstream news outlets such as CNN, etc. That's never a good sign. Especially since this story wouldn't be an opinion piece or analysis; it'd be just-the-facts reporting on the actions of House. If anyone finds confirmation of this actually happening in C-SPAN's Congressional coverage, please let us know!

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117hresPIH-hres5.pdf

https://rules.house.gov/press-releases/pelosi-and-mcgovern-unveil-details-rules-package-117th-congress

https://i.imgur.com/ClFtd3S.png

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you! :) (Or maybe that oughtta be more like, "thanks, I hate it", huh?)

Do you (or anyone else here) happen to know what rule XXIII is? That's what the striking of these familial terms (mother/father, daughter/son, etc.) and insertion of "gender-inclusive" ones applies to. Specifically clause 8(c)(3). Is it the same as the Senate's Standing Rule 23, SR Rule XXIII: Privilege of the Floor? And if so... what is that? (And why is it a Senate rule, rather than a House one?)

Also, I notice that all of the terms being replaced ARE familial ones-- not man/woman, or boy/girl. (At least not yet...) Which, the way things are going on the trans/genderist front these days, is a major relief: thank heaven for small favors... So I don't wanna tempt fate by asking this, but: does anyone know why? How come Pelosi isn't making all sex-based terms "gender-inclusive"? Is that just an oversight? Is this simply testing the waters, or working her way up to the most radical changes? Or an attempt to placate the genderists without going the whole hog?

And, come to think of it, if this is meant as appeasement... seems like a miscalculation, doesn't it? And not only because you're dealing with people who are the very definition of give-them-an-inch-and-they'll-take-a-mile. There's also the fact that "transwomen" and "transmen" don't WANT gender-neutral language! Refer to them as a "parent" and they'll REEEEE up a storm! No-- THEIR goal is that everyone be forced to call them "mother" and "father" (or "daughter"/"son", "aunt"/"uncle", etc.), respectively. The LAST thing they're interested in is de-gendering society! Indeed, what they're seeking is the opposite: making "gender identity" so central as to be inescapable.

Does this mean that I'm right about why Democrats (and liberals/progressives generally) are supporting the "trans" cause-- that they're misreading it as a rebellion AGAINST "gender roles"? So that, once they realize they got it backwards... they'll withdraw that support?

[–]SedateApe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"nothing from the likes of reputable, mainstream news outlets such as CNN, etc."

I know about 72/73 million people that often laugh at these kinds of comment about this particular "news" source. And several others

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To be clear, I'm not saying that mainstream news sources like this are immune to errors, or bias. I KNOW they aren't. Not only because I can cite some specific instances of both, but due to the fact that... they are, after all, composed of humans. Which tells you right there that the capacity for these things is built-in.

What I am saying is that they're useful; they provide things that non-mainstream, overtly-of-a-political-persuasion sources cannot. For one thing, they do original reporting; the others typically piggyback on that. Productively, in many cases (their op-eds/analysis can be a valuable contribution)... but they still need someone to dig up the material in the first place. Also, while the mainstream certainly CAN be biased, the others flat-out ARE-- inescapably so; it's their fucking mission statement, fer chrissakes. That just goes with the territory. It's not so much "bad" or "good" as an inherent limitation.

So basically, for news, I take the survey approach-- looking across a range of outlets. Who's reporting this? Everybody? Or only the self-declared partisans? It's kind of a parts-of-the-elephant situation. The partisans concentrate on a certain part (say, the trunk); the mainstream are generalists. You put 'em together to get a sense of the whole animal. Usually obsessing on the trunk is too limiting, especially given their propensity to treat EVERYTHING as the trunk (like there is nothing else)... but sometimes? It picks up what the generalists miss.

[–]SedateApe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

WOW.

And I mean WOW!

So it was just fine that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNBC, print media, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Google, and so many others...just but the Hunter Biden story?

Or not question the limited access to Biden during his campaign? Or the softball questions they were handed to ask Biden during his all to infrequent and all too limited news conferences?

How about calling the US economy as being bad, before the election, when it was actually recovering better then all the BIASED media outlets feared..much better then they FEARED! Or just forgetting to mention how much better then expected the economy got for wages, hours worked, exports, lack unemployment, brown unemployment, women's unemployed, teen employment....before the Wuhan Virus struck?

Nothing at all about how US farmers were finally getting a fair market price for produces shipped to China after the tariffs were out in place and agricultural shipments halted! Nay. We see how much farmers were subsidized during the trade negotiations and nothing about how much better off they are now.

You mean this kind of research, and poles, and surveys, and balance?

WOW. Followed by another WOW.

[–]LeaveAmsgAfterBeep 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Seems like fake “news” to me

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What the literal actual fuck...

[–]turtleduck23 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

it's real https://nypost.com/2021/01/01/house-rules-may-be-stripped-of-all-gender-references/

[–]reluctant_commenter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I don't want to give Breitbart clicks, even if a broken clock is right twice a day. Thanks for the link.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (40 children)

Pelosi must go. She’s awful. It doesn’t surprise me that she’s representing San Francisco - look how that city’s turned out.

EDIT - I’ve noticed that the link was removed. Okay, you don’t have to agree with the source, but a broken clock is still right twice a day. At least allow archive links.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (39 children)

They all are adicted to the needle too

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (38 children)

Also a lot of shit on the streets.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (37 children)

No wonder, but u/eurowoman24 will deny this

[–]Eurowoman24 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (36 children)

I'd never live in l.a/san francisco given the state (ha!) it's in. Not even for a green card.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

I would never live in USA in general. All sucks. Canada isn't much different. Better in quality of life, but totally gone when it comes to islam and trans too. Sad.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

North America in general. At least America has some states that are good to live in. But America is too reliant on cars, healthcare is prohibitively expensive, taxes and living costs are going up while infrastructure is going down, censorship is on the rise and food standards are bad. But Canada is the wokest country on earth. If I had to live in North America, I’d probably live in the parts of Mexico that are safe, like the city of Monterrey, or in Panama.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (20 children)

No forget about guns too and weight epidemic. USA is one the most stressed country on earth. I'm sorry for people there who have health problems, living in a country like that make even worst. California is said to be better, but in the end they're all the same, it's the USA culture

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

On the guns issue, they should be regulated like guns. If you don’t know how to use a gun, or have a criminal record that has not been expunged, or have mental health problems, you should not be allowed to take your guns outside of your house. But the weight problem is what puts me off American men. Driving around to get everywhere because everything is so spread out and public transport sucks is the biggest culprit here, but eating unhealthy food certainly doesn’t help. Bread has too much sugar, as do most food products, healthy food is expensive, corn syrup is everywhere, and Americans are eating lots of soy, which lowers a man's testosterone. I am a sucker for US marines, soldiers and police officers, but half of them put on weight after they get discharged or retire. There are a lot of good looking people in California, and there are a lot of army and marine bases there, but it’s not worth it. The hottest marines in the world living there is not worth the excessive amount of taxes they force you to pay just to live in a state where you can get off with a six-month sentence for deliberately infecting someone with AIDS or legally have sex with a ten year old. I prefer Florida.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

You can legally have sex with a ten years old?

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Yeah, and mexican girls are SO hot.I got a fetish for latino girls. Too bad mexico is bad country. Otherwise I would just move there. Awesome culture and people

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Mexican men are hot. Latino men in general. Mexico is a dangerous country because of the powerful drug cartels, but there are oases scattered around the country. Monterrey is a well run city, but there are other places and resorts that are safe and gay friendly. Other Latin countries I’d consider living in are Panama, Colombia and Chile. Maybe Brazil as well. Maybe.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yeah, and they're very machos too. While the girls are very expressive with big character. A lot like italians, but with hotter accent, and shorter. To me is just perfect.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

California would be the last state I’d love in if I had to move to America. And there are very few states I’d consider living in, like Florida, Montana, or the Dakotas. Not Texas though, because that state is turning into California.

[–]Eurowoman24 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

well there's a mass exodus of californians moving to texas, no wonder!

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Such a shame. I’d rather live in Florida. There are a lot of weirdos there, like in every state. But it’s good some lovely beaches, lots of gay bars, and a majority of people coming to the state are Cubans, the exact opposite of Californians. So Florida will not be going the same route as California.

[–]Eurowoman24 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

didn't they vote for trump?(I remember the dems were so surprised and thought they had that demographic) i'd be interested in checking out nola, atlanta and other cities like that

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, Florida voted for Trump twice. Second time might have been partly because of support Trump received from the Cuban community. Cubans tend to lean Republican from what I’ve heard.

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

yeahhhh...my dad sent me this this morning. :{

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Child of parent a/stepchild of parent b: "Parent a stepparent a. I have arrived at our shared domicile! I witnessed parent a's sibling Sandra's presence on the grounds of educational institution on current day. Location of grandparent b?"

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–]Elvira95Viva la figa[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Do you want to compare the first country in the world, the one who goes abroad to export democracy to third world countries? USA sucks. It's full of incredibly dumb people and comportations and money making are more important than human right. No wonder the trans ideology is so strong there. The worst thing is that you export your bullshit abroad

    [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Preach sister

    [–]Airbus320 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Coomer

    [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    u/movellon this person is calling other people dumb

    [–]Movellon[M] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    The has been removed as it's dragging down the pyramid of debate.