all 13 comments

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 22 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

And only "lesbians" is "free for all" category anyone can identify into.

Also, from what arse they got that weird statistics?

Especially considering that "rape" legally can only be done with penis involved. Is it because "identifying as lesbian" is there and not "lesbian" that they are including penises in statistics?

Tweet seems to be deleted now, but it was screenshoted and archieved:

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 8 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

I get hot when you get all inquisitive.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Been that way since they redefined lesbian to be non-men loving non-men. Never seen them describe gay men this way, but they do it with lesbian all the time. Apparently all it takes to be a lesbian these days is to not identify as a man. Which I guess includes like every animal since they are non-men who are attracted to non-men?

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This people are so fucking disgusting, damn

[–]NutterButterFlutterStill waving into the void 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Anyone get an archive? Doesn't seem to be coming up for me, I think they deleted?

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, that's nice. At least they realized they made a mistake - but there no apology.

I'll try searching in cache or maybe someone archieved in replies there.


[–]fuck_reddit 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

There isn’t an ounce of consistency across those posts. They use completely different terms in each sentence. What counts as “sexual violence”? Is it the same or broader than rape? Cause are we comparing like to like or apples to oranges??? And that’s just ignoring the way they convey sexuality…

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I noticed the 2 stats for men just included sexual violence, but the 2 for women included stalking in addition to sexual violence. So these statistics are not even measuring the same things. Worthless internet statistics are worthless.

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is way too often like that in such cases:

[–]fuck_reddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. Equivocal language is a plague on the Earth.

[–]reluctant_commenter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Reminds me of Coca-Cola recently banning "lesbian" from being written as a word on their customizable cans, apparently it's too dirty or offensive or something:

"Lesbian identifying people" thanks a lot, I'm more and more tempted to just call myself homosexual and not even use the word lesbian. If all people hear when I say "I'm a lesbian" is "I'm a porn category," why the fuck would I?

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would not gave up our worlds to them - they want words "woman", "female", "lesbian" and some others. Those words are descriving me, not them, so they can f*ck off.

[–]reluctant_commenter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not a fan of "lesbian" because of how radical feminists have historically tried to take it over, as well. But I agree with you generally speaking, it's messed up that people are trying to redefine and obscure or hide discussion of female homosexuality (and the existence of sex in humans).