all 7 comments

[–]hufflepuff-poet 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So many bisexuals are biphobic af. Bisexuality is not a political tool, it is a sexual orientation; are you attracted to both sexes? If Yes, congrats you're a bisexual whether you like it or not! If No, congrats, you're either homosexual or heterosexual depending on whether you're exclusively SSA or OSA! Stop complicating what should be a simple and straight forward concept!!

God, we need a freaking sexuality 101 class for these idiots 🙄😒

[–]PriestTheyCalledHimBisexual 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are also women who are not bisexual or lesbian at all, but are heterosexual/straight but identify as "lesbian" because they claim it is for political reasons, feminism, women's rights, etc.

[–]jay-dayGold Star Gay Woman 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

She chose those quotes trying to prove that bi "lesbians" exist, but those quotes just show that those women were lesbophobic. Calling our sexual orientation a choice, what political group you align with, and being a "lifestyle."

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Well... notice how ALL of the women whom she quoted are middle-aged or older. So they "came up" (and came out) at a time when "same-sex attracted" automatically meant gay/lesbian/homosexual. Bisexuals were barely a blip on anyone's radar yet. (That didn't really happen until the 1990s, for about five minutes.) Including our own. The upshot of which is: women that age? Originally came out as lesbian. Because that was the only option. Not just for what you called yourself, but for how you understood yourself. The reason being that, quite simply, there was nothing else on offer then.

So, the lesbian community was where they started out, you know? They forged relationships in it, worked for it, contributed to it... were part of it. And they haven't necessarily left any of that behind. Or wanted to. It may well remain an important part of their life.

It's not my own story, but I can see how it can be other women's. Without any lesbophobia involved. Though of course I'm on record here (more like a broken record at this point probably) about how all bi people need to recognize themselves as such, not only for our own sake, but for the sake of gay people as well. Because that keeps the definition of gay/lesbian/homosexual as "exclusively same-sex attracted" crystal clear.

One more thing: there's a longstanding problem for bi people when in LGB spaces-- namely that we're often expected to leave our "opposite-sex-attracted side" behind. To let nothing show but the SSA part of us. To, in other words, pretend that we're gay. And while I'm certainly not advocating for bi women in such places to go around extolling the virtues of dick (or for bi men to sing the praises of pussy), I think that respect for our differences is a healthy thing. On multiple levels. The avoidance of any further "bi lesbian" nonsense most definitely among them! :)

[–]jay-dayGold Star Gay Woman 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They seem to be able to tell the difference. That's why they say their sexuality is bi but politics are lesbian. I don't believe that the bi women that were close to the lesbian community were unable to understand the differences to what lesbians say (not being attracted to men yada yada) and their own (being attracted to both). Unless they either didn't listen, or weren't that involved in the lesbian community.

I get the reason why the LGB doesn't want to hear about bisexuals opposite-sex attraction. We want to center same-sex attraction, opposite attraction there isn't much to talk about as it's accepted everywhere. I don't believe gay men or lesbians want bisexuals to "pretend" to be gay, just focus on SSA in conversations in the LGB. I guess it's also because there are more bisexuals than gays and lesbians, and most bisexuals are in opposite sex relationships, so we don't want OSA relationships dominating the one community we have. It's similar to alot of criticisms that I hear from bi women on bisexual groups- that the bisexual spaces are too het centered.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't mean that they can't tell the difference (at least by this point); it's that the difference goes beyond what you yourself spell out-- the difference of sexual orientation itself. There's also the difference between a defined, established culture/identity (albeit one currently under siege by the forces of TQ+) vs a largely undefined, yet-to-be-established culture/identity. That's where the "sexuality is bi, politics is lesbian" comes in. To a great degree, all we bisexuals HAVE is our sexuality. There's no organization, no movement, no community to speak of; the basic conceptual/philosophical work has never been done-- probably because the rise of TQ+ strangled it in its cradle. So we tend to see our culture, our politics, in terms of... someone else's identity. Especially given that our own is still all too nebulous. What with the whole "well, you're REALLY either gay or straight anyway!" thing and all.

And I certainly agree that LGB shouldn't focus on opposite-sex attraction; that's not what bi people need. Like gay people, what we need to address are those things which stigmatize us in society's eyes: the elements of homophobia on the one hand, and biphobia on the other. As best I can tell, these boil down to two each. The first-- stigmatization of same-sex attraction-- we both share. The second-- stigmatization of lacking opposite-sex attraction (for homosexuals), and stigmatization of lacking monosexuality (for bisexuals)-- we do not. So while it is, of course, natural and fitting that LGB should focus on what we have in common, that can't be to the exclusion of what affects us each specifically.

For instance, look at what I myself do here. In addition to talking about bi issues, I also spend a lot of time defending the right to be EXCLUSIVELY same-sex attracted. That's not something which is ever gonna affect ME, by definition. That's for YOU guys. Because gay people are under attack; because homosexuality itself is under attack. And I have your back. Just like I want you to have mine.

So what does this mean in practice? Well, for example, not making bi people feel unwelcome for having opposite-sex significant others. Who may even be straight. And bringing them to certain LGB spaces. Yes, I realize that this is not without its challenges-- some inherent, some due to current circumstances (specifically the invasion of all things LGB by TQ+ colonizers). But I think that we can negotiate this together. And should, if we want to be the LGB, and not simply the LGb... or even just the LG.

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.