top 100 commentsshow all 135

[–]proc0 23 insightful - 10 fun23 insightful - 9 fun24 insightful - 10 fun -  (12 children)

Oh no, females will need to be more careful having sex! The tyranny!

[–]CanisRex 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

right? god fucking forbid you not create a human life just to actually murder it. HEAVENS NO....I have to practice some personal responsibility?! Time for revolution!

[–]Insider 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Imagine if the right wing was as concerned about the millions of ppl the government has murdered and raped as they were about abortion.

But hey, I guess no abortions means more supply of children for the pedo rings.

[–]CanisRex 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

i'm not "right wing", if that's what you're implying, I'm just a normal guy that's against literal baby murder. but yeah elite leftist leadership is pretty well known for its pedo sex rings, right? Although how your ass links these two issues, i have absolutely zero idea.

millions of ppl the government has murdered and raped

Lol WAt?

uh yeah, they rape me every april with that you mean?

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Who says they aren't. Oh right, leftist propagandists.

[–]Ehhhhhh 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Everyone must accept that the government owns you and that you must accept vaccine mandates.

Much shilling today in support of this calling women slots or praising God. There is nothing godly about this. This is a ruling against all of us slaves to the govt.

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Do you think the government should step in and prevent child abuse? Should we get rid of CPS and allow parents to rape thier kids? Where does a governments responsibility to protect children end?

[–]Ehhhhhh 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This wasnt about child abuse. This was about removing precedent for bodily autonomy and allowing the govt to have more of a say in men and women's bodies.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Um, no. It is about child abuse no matter how much you want to deny the humanity of those you kill.

[–]CanisRex 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

calling women slots

Who says this? Ever?

[–]CreditKnifeMan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everyone must accept that the government owns you

This is true. We're now all 14th amendment citizen serfs. Voluntary servitude.

Born into "citizenship" with a silent serf contract with the lord of manor.

We accept the label of "citizen", but the definition changed with the 14th amendment.

"Citizenship" doesn't mean what most believe it means; not in a legal sense. Far from it.

It means a person accepts federal protection from physical retaliation by the states against former slaves.

But not protection from Jim Crowe laws, etc. These remained, and became the administrative state.

The administrative state; with policies, and policy enforcements. The EPA, FDA, etc. These agencies interpret laws, and create their own policies.
Policies aren't laws, but they apply to citizen serfs.
They police the serfs, and their limited privileges.
They license activities that violate policies/laws.
The corporate courts enforce the policies of the agencies on the serfs. Police enforce the policy.

The IRS. Hated by all.
Income taxes are "voluntary", but you can't volunteer out with the IRS. They don't have the jurisdiction to recognize a political change.
It's not their responsibility.

It's actually "voluntary", but most don't know how to "volunteer" out of the system.

The 14th amendment changed the nature of citizenship.
It removed Constitutional protections of God-given Rights.

The 14th scam, administered civil rights, and the laws of man. The right to vote isn't technically a civil right.
They can take it away. Disenfranchisement.

They can take your guns.

Because, the constitutional protections don't apply to you.
Because you were volunteered out, when your parents declared you a citizen, and registered you with the state.

And you continue to volunteer out, as a "US citizen".

"Residence" became a legal condition, which applied to citizen serfs.

"Residence" doesn't mean "where you live".
It's a legal contract with the land where you domicile; where the serfs reside.
That you agreed to, when you declared residency.

This residency contract grants the state jurisdiction over you.
And it's also, voluntary. But nobody ever tells us about any of this.

We're effectively living in a condition of voluntary servitude, under modern Jim Crowe laws. Literally.

Many US oligarchical families have an entirely different legal status. They have constitutional protections. State and federal jurisdictions do not apply to them. The most relevant legal system to these folks is the ICC.
International Commercial Code. Business contracts, etc.

That's why some Americans are beyond the reach of the "law". Legally.

There is a way to volunteer yourself out of the system.

It's so easy that is almost unbelievable.

But you have to declare your intention to the Lord of the United States Manor Corp (not The United States of America).

They can't refuse your declaration, and they won't say a peep.

They pretend it didn't happen, but the courts will leave you alone, so you don't reveal their fraud (assuming you don't break the commercial law code, or property rights.

The citizenship manipulation is a fraud. A crime.

But.. Fraud isn't fraud, until it's identified and legally challenged/exposed.

Can you guess who the Lord of the manor is?

Edit: The "sawvern citizen" and "admiralty" court conspiracies are red herrings.

They were probably created to mislead the public away from the actual facts.

"Admiralty law" is actually commercial code.

Commercial code, is the modern version of the Babylonian contact law/code.
It has many nautical sounding terms, because merchants often used ships to deliver goods. This historical relationship is thus apparent, and obvious.

Do yourself a favor and ignore the commercial code red herring.

The truth lies in the laws of the feudal system. The law of the liege lord. The law of man.

This system has well over a thousand years of legal precedent.
It works exceptionally well for voluntary servitude.

The US Constitution outlawed involuntary servitude.
Voluntary servitude is legal, by omission.

[–]yabbit 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

HOES MAD (x24)

[–]ID10T 19 insightful - 5 fun19 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 5 fun -  (44 children)

I look forward to the news of 11-year old incest rape victims being forced to bear children, women with ectopic non-viable pregnancies dying due to being forced to carry, women who have miscarriages being prosecuted for murder, and rapists getting paternal rights to their children. But yeah, if only those whores would keep their legs shut, the sluts.

[–]CanisRex 15 insightful - 7 fun15 insightful - 6 fun16 insightful - 7 fun -  (30 children)

11-year old incest rape victims being forced to bear children, women with ectopic non-viable pregnancies dying due to being forced to carry, women who have miscarriages being prosecuted for murder, and rapists getting paternal rights to their children. But yeah, if only those whores would keep their legs shut

Practically no abortions are the result of these situations - the fraction that are are statistically irrelevant. No one argues that abortions aren't warranted in those situations. Wait until you're a parent and understand the sort of horror seeing mid and late term abortions causes for mothers and fathers before you think this is bad. Also, telling people to practice some personal responsibility is not a bad thing - getting pregnant is eminently preventable.

All in all, a victory for the rights of the unborn.

[–]jet199 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I literary saw the plastic paddy on the Tim Pool podcast argue exactly that a couple of weeks ago.

Saying "No one argues that" is so lazy and dishonest.

Maybe take a your head out of your arse and look at what people are arguing rather than assuming you know.

[–]IMissPorn 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

No one argues that abortions aren't warranted in those situations.

This unfortunately is not true at all. Many people consider abortion murder. From that perspective, rape and incest have no bearing on the situation. Abortion to save the life of the mother might be acceptable, since self defense is about the only justification for homicide, but I'm sure there are extremists who would say not even then. Women have already been prosecuted for miscarriage too, incidentally, and I expect that to increase.

[–]CanisRex 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

don't get me wrong, abortions in those situations would only be acceptable immediately after the assault - like as in a week or so - and I 100% consider them murder.

I don't think that abortions for women who were just irresponsible are acceptable AT ALL. Ever. At any stage in the pregnancy. As I said, its eminently preventable. Between abstinence, condoms, HBC, and Plan B - birth control is 100 percent effective. If you create a life, it is yours to protect - a mother killing her unborn child because she failed to practice any restraint, personal responsibility, or just common sense, as a human adult is the very epitome of degeneracy and social decline.

All that said...the overturning of Roe v Wade is not the horrible end of civilization event that everybody is whining about. Its delegating the funding/legality of abortions to the state level which is completely reasonable. The only thing that will change in most states is where the money is coming from to fund them - it'll be state taxes now instead of federal taxes.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

don't get me wrong, abortions in those situations would only be acceptable immediately after the assault - like as in a week or so - and I 100% consider them murder.

“Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin." Deuteronomy 24:16

[–]CanisRex 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)


[–]TooMuchClay 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No, not many, simply untrue. Pro-lifers believe in the case of real danger to the mother saving her life comes first. Weirdo outliers that believe evil shit are not an example against the whole. I've met leftos that actually believe the Catholic Church used to burn witches. I don't other progressives on their ignorance.

Read a little more what other opinions are before representing them. I.e. I understand the pro-choice concerns regards reproductive rights. And it's a valid concern and worth listening to

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Women have already been prosecuted for miscarriage too

That is so obviously propaganda. Do you seriously not understand that they called it a miscarraige when it was in fact an abortion?

[–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

See? That's the kind of attitude I'm worried about. Miscarriages happen, shockingly often actually, people just don't like to talk about it. If in even 1% of cases people look at the circumstances say "obviously an abortion" that's a huge risk for injustice.

[–]ID10T 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I have some personal experience with abortion. It is certainly not something to be taken lightly. I think that late term abortions should be illegal except for extraordinary circumstances, e.g. the baby will be stillborn or suffer from horrific birth defects. However the horrors that will unfold when all abortion is made illegal I believe is beyond your comprehension.

There will be cases here like Ireland's case regarding the death of Savita Halapannavar which ultimately caused that country to overturn their ban on abortion.

More if you're interested in possibly seeing the other side of the equation

[–]CanisRex 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

beyond your comprehension.

you sure about that? My comprehension is pretty far reaching.

death of Savita Halapannavar

Give me a proportion of situations like this to actual abortions. I think it'll be good for you to do the leg work.

ossibly seeing the other side of the equation

I am indeed not interested. I feel bad for my family in the UK - they've fallen so far over there - you have a practical nanny state.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If it is ok to kill someone who is trying to kill you why is it bad for a mother to die from killing her child?

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Also, it's a real setback for eugenics. We're going to see a surge in crime and prison population beginning in about 13-16 years. America gets more slaves, I guess that's a plus if you're into the whole slavery thing.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I think the crime wave will be tempered somewhat by the future generation being to scared to leave the house.

[–]crustybutt_is_socks 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Only low-IQ buffoons care about your worthless appeal to the Just In Case fallacy. Thanks for telling us all what you are in your username.

There will be literally zero cases of any of the bizarre things that you're on about. Zero. You don't know anyone who went through any of that; you don't even know of anyone who went through that. Your scenarios are an unimaginative regurgitation of what others have written on the social media sites you frequent.

Killing over 600,000 a year in anticipation of utterly ridiculous hypothetical situations that don't even happen outside of your paranoid demented minds, merely trying to rationalize the most despicable of acts, is clearly unwarranted.

Why don't you just admit that you actually don't care one iota about human life, rather than pathetically hiding behind logically fallacious arguments that are absolutely transparent to anyone with more than half a brain?

[–]life_always_wins 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ectopic pregnancy treatment is not elective abortion. Miscarriage is not elective abortion. Try again.

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you think it is better to have wholesale murder of unwanted babies rather than a few incest ones born? That just sounds like unbridaled evil to me.

[–]ShekelPa 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Boo fucking who. Your brainwash media will gladly cherry pick to make this seem like a common occurrence like "gun violence"

[–]yabbit 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

woah woah woah half the country isn't white that's you guy's problem not ours

[–]aldnorth 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)



[–]FourteenDigitz 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thank god there’s some sanity in this site getting upvoted. OP and anyone here agreeing with him are the real incels just projecting because the idea of women having sex and not being forced to bear children as a punishment infuriates them

[–]thethrowaway 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

Oh it got overturned? Imo they did this at the worst possible time

Dont get me wrong I am not an abortion advocate and if I accidentally impregnated somebody I would man up and raise the damn kid with her because abortion is unquestionably murder

But seriously the first step should have been dissolving hookup culture as a whole. Spread information about having safe sex, the negatives of hookups, abstinence, etc

Idk Im not american

[–]Dr_Bukkake 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

It’s too late, social media has ruined a whole generation of children.

[–]CanisRex 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

its our job as millennials to raise gen Alpha with some moral integrity. We've already failed Gen Z.

[–]Dr_Bukkake 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

I don’t know man the current young generation have career ambitions to show their butthole on Onlyfans for five bucks a pop.

[–]CanisRex 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

maybe. i'm not black pilled yet, though.

[–]CancelPower 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Dont get me wrong I am not an abortion advocate and if I accidentally impregnated somebody I would man up and raise the damn kid with her because abortion is unquestionably murder

You are everything wrong with this world. "Man up" Yeah sure, because raising a child you don't want to raise is a "man behavior" now, how nice toxic masculinity. "abortion is unquestionably murder" Oh shut the fuck up, no it isn't.

Spare us your stupidity, republican.

[–]thethrowaway 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Yea man its called taking responsibility. Didnt realize that was toxic but k

[–]Greykittymomma 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (7 children)

Semantics my friend, spare us your lecture, democrat 🤣 if you don't abort them they usually turn into children.

You are arguing about objective truths in different languages. Aborting a fetus = a human offspring being stopped from growing / eventually living.

Women having miscarriages would consider a fetus a child. Maybe you would like to correct them and say they shouldn't be sad because it wasn't a baby yet, just cells?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Rawr, girl fight!

[–]CancelPower 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

You realize that you are supporting a party that's going to take away our gay rights...right? RIGHT?

[–]ShekelPa 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Fuck faggots. You people only claimed to want to get married and left alone and fast forward to now you demand to molest children in broad daylight while cops keep parents away.

You brought this shit upon yourselves.

[–]CancelPower 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You keep claiming that we molest children when churches are bigger rapists and molesters than anybody else, you nutjob loser.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Dont be salty, drink coconut water

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imo they did this at the worst possible time

They did this just in time to use this to divide people for the elections. This is a huge wedge issue and they need to crack the whip on democrats because too many are running away from that party.

[–]LordoftheFlies 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

I'm shocked that you forgot the biggest, deepest salt mine of them all, r/childfree/. They're going completely insane over there, and I'm sitting back and munching my popcorn with a big fucking smile at the hyperbole and gratuitous exaggeration from the mob.

[–]BanditMcFuklebuck 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I dont click on reddit links. surfing reddit generates income from ads for those scumfucks

[–]IMissPorn 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ads? What ads? Don't tell me you're not using an ad blocker.

[–]Dr_Bukkake 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

All over Facebook stupid liberal women that I know from my state are posting shit about how men shouldn’t be able to make decisions for their body’s and how their rights are being trampled. Meanwhile abortion will still be fucking legal in our state. It’s all fake virtue signaling outrage, they have no idea what the Supreme Court actually ruled.

[–]Greykittymomma 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

And they overturned the decision by MEN! My gosh these ladies are something else. I am one and I shake my head and some of the signs I have seen today...

[–]JuliusCaesar225 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

I look at America today and think how much better it would be with 20M more blacks because that is what Roe vs Wade has prevented. Finally we can began being more enriched by a growing black population again. Based conservative Christians owning the libs.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

u/clownowski hates black children

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Most Americans support some limits on abortion like we have in Europe.

The trouble with Roe v Wade was that it was so extreme that lots of people could hate it and neither side could really support it fully.

There's a reason the democrats never wrote it into law.

Now there's the possibility of an adult discussion about time limits and medical necessity.

And this will hurt republicans in the end because they have kept a lot of votes on this one issue which may not come out for them again.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Btw, thanks for changing the links to old.reddit. And something else that's bugging me, don't those subs seem strangely quiet for being major subs? Besides the stuff you can tell got boosted to the front page, the average likes and comments are pretty low.

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I am really, really surprised at this turn of events. I never thought I would live to see the day when the Supreme Court overturned Roe Vs Wade. The leftist outrage amuses me greatly. They haven't been this angry since Ginsburg died.

[–]IkeConn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Now red states have a poison pill to discourage lefties from moving there.

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Good point. I haven't thought about this. Wonder how this will effect the migration of Californians into Midwest.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Now if they live here they'll have to raise their wives' children.

[–]yabbit 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)


[–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Thots raging and crying

[–]meisthebigdumb 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

r/all seething rn 😹😹😹

[–]Jatz_Crackers 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Before you ask, life starts in the testicles. <3

Reddit is a hell hole that data mines your personal information.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

The only good thing from this besides lib tears, is maybe it will kill the hookup culture. Many women will now think twice before having casual sex with some random Tyrone from dating app.

Bye bye Tinder, Bumble, OKCupid and other shit. :)

[–]Foidblaster9000 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't OKcupid just a standard e-dating site?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno, I don't use it, lol

[–]TarBaby 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

All this does is move abortion rights from the federal government to each state government. So if your state supports abortion, you can still get one.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And abort a tar baby

[–]TarBaby 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

More blacks than whites get aborted.

[–]Ehhhhhh 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

That is just a distraction to make us think this is a good thing..

You won't need abortions with the infertility coming with jab mandates and other required medical procedures coming now.

This is about removing our rights to our bodies - male or female and is attack on personal liberty. This is not a good thing. "My body, my choice" is being attacked.

[–]iamonlyoneman 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Ehhhhh not so much. Roe was a shit decision and should never have been handed down as-written. The sCOTUS finally has undone what was a very very bad bit of jurisprudence. The amount of liberty increases as States have their rights to legislate their own policy restored.

Women, of course, still enjoy the freedom to keep their whoreholes shut (like they did all along). Literally almost all abortions are conducted for the sake of personal convenience, which is an evil perpetrated on millions of children every year. It is a good thing that the Dobbs decision reverses Roe.

If you read and understand this, you will agree.

[–]Ehhhhhh 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I did read it and noticed the forum sliding to hide opposition.

It isn't a good thing that personal liberties are reversed on a federal level.

States can restrict further but can't increase scope.

This isn't about abortion.

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

There was no personal liberty reversed. It's like someone blowing smoke in your eyes and you complain that it's no longer cloudy when the smoke dissipates.

[–]Cass 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

This is about not pushing onto people responsibilities that they don't want. I think a solution to that in the US would be to bring back orphanages.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

If you don't want a child, get married before you have sex. That's voluntary responsibility so obvs. you want it if you have it

[–]Cass 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And how does marriage help if you don't want a child?

How is it voluntary? It's not, that's why you need to build orphanages. And prisons, because those orphans aren't gonna become upstanding tax payers.

edit: there are already 400k unwanted children in foster care in the US. Future prison residents. What are you doing about those right now?

And most abortions are performed on black women. In 20 years imagine the BLM protests with 10x more blacks. If the black population in the US continues to grow it'll turn into South Africa. If you're white and you have children they'll be raped and killed by some blacks that should have been aborted. When that happens, just remember it's not their fault :)

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's voluntary to have sex and don't come crying about red herring edge cases.

Marriage helps because you have the support structure a child needs to thrive and to succeed. If you're having surprise children at least don't abandon them to fatherlessness!

Foster children are a red herring, do better

Most abortions are done on non-black women, but a larger percentage of black women have abortions. The niggerpocalypse FUD is about as low of racist nonsense as can be employed, why don't you put all that hateful energy into reforming black urban culture and then the next generation of darks can be good people. You know a hundred years ago almost all blacks were born into intact families with solid family values, right?

[–]MagicMike 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

People who are too stupid to read the directions on a box of birth control pills or don’t like the feel of a condom now can’t get other people to pay for their impulsiveness and stupidity. Of course, the poor kid in all this means a welfare check and a shitty Section 8 rat hole for baby momma.

The stupids fuck everything up.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Birth control pills are only 90% reliable in real life.

They aren't the magical solution men like to think they are.

You can use it perfectly then get a stomach upset and your body won't absorb it and you might know nothing about it.

[–]LordoftheFlies 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I don't have a dog in the abortion fight, so I really don't care one way or the other on the issue. But I do find it hilarious how often it's "well women should keep their legs together and not get babby in belly." Like, there's just the one person involved in the whole process and nobody else needs to keep it in their pants at all 🤣.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Not even going into the terrible health and mental health side effects these drugs have.

Men: Oh noes, there's a tiny dose of hormones in tap water. My dick will literally fall off and I'll turn onto Pamela Anderson.

Also men: why can't women just take this huge dose of hormones every day or literally have implant inserted into their bodies so I don't have to wear a condom?

[–]asterias 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Maybe women should learn to screen men better instead of letting some random dude fuck them without a condom.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Women do highly screen men, as you well know from experience.

[–]asterias 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Then they shouldn't complain.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is not good at all, it's very foolish to be happy about it. There will be terrible consequences for the american society in the future, for example lots of unwanted and abandoned children who will grow up to be criminals and even terrorists, even more single mothers, higher taxes to support those fatherless children, women and teenager girls dying in childbirth or while trying to get illegal abortion and many, many others. The future looks grim and there's nothing to laugh about.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

I will be happy whenever I feel like it, and now I am very happy

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And what are you happy about? That in case of little "accident" with your girlfriend, you will be forced to father unwanted child? Or that you will pay much higher taxes because your goverment will have to support all these future single mothers and their kids? Or that that streets will be ever more unsafe because there will be rise of criminals and serial shooters?

But hey, if you really are okay with all of it, then enjoy i guess?

[–]asterias 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

That in case of little "accident" with your girlfriend, you will be forced to father unwanted child?

Learn to use a condom or have a vasectomy?

Or that you will pay much higher taxes because your goverment will have to support all these future single mothers and their kids?

In case you don't know, my (European if that matters) government and soyciety already encourages single mothers and makes me pay high taxes so that women can offload their offspring instead of raising them themselves as they should. Perhaps women should learn something like taking responsibility instead of having others pay for their problems. And yes, abortion is legal here and abortion rates are the highest in Europe.

Or that that streets will be ever more unsafe because there will be rise of criminals and serial shooters?

The streets are already unsafe thanks to the authorities not doing their job and rapefugees coming by the thousands without anyone stopping them.

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I spent some time on twoX last night just to bask in their rage!

And no big protests! Because "No Uterus, No Opinion" so most men dgaf and most women can't get shit done on their own!

[–][deleted]  (4 children)


    [–]crustybutt_is_socks 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Kick the bucket already, socks, you subhuman evil old bastard who should have been aborted in the place of an innocent life.

    Over 600,000 lives in America alone are being lost each year because of your anti-life, anti-natalist nihilistic subhuman ideology, which, like all of your ilk, you only find appealing because your subhuman, low-IQ brains need to rationalize your flagrantly degenerate immorality. This is the real Holocaust, not that other nonsense.

    Your barbaric, savage, uncivilized 'progressive' views have absolutely zero place in any genuinely progressing world, stupid regressive shit-sucking parasite. Now, step aside and let an innocent life breathe the air and eat the food that is being wasted on you.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)


      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      I thought these two high ranked comments from politics were informative. Not shocked they're going after gay rights, people are sick of their behavior.

      Alito's opinion:

      This is evident in the analogy that the dissent draws between the abortion right and the rights recognized in Griswold (contraception), Eisenstadt (same), Lawrence (sexual conduct with member of the same sex), and Obergefell (same-sex marriage). Perhaps this is designed to stoke unfounded fear that our decision will imperil those other rights (...)

      Thomas's concurrence:

      For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.

      Alito acts all offended that anyone would have the audacity to suggest that they're also looking at contraception and gay marriage, only for Thomas to jump in and helpfully point out that they're definitely looking at those too.

      The dissent is spicy

      Either the majority does not really believe in its own reasoning. Or if it does, all rights that have no history stretching back to the mid19th century are insecure. Either the mass of the majority’s opinion is hypocrisy, or additional constitutional rights are under threat. It is one or the other.


      The Court reverses course today for one reason and one reason only: because the composition of this Court has changed. [...] Today, the proclivities of individuals rule. The Court departs from its obligation to faithfully and impartially apply the law.


      The majority scoffs at that idea, castigating us for “repeatedly prais[ing] the ‘balance’” the two cases arrived at (with the word “balance” in scare quotes). Ante, at 38. To the majority “balance” is a dirty word, as moderation is a foreign concept.

      Feels good to read something so clear and articulate call out this court's majority.

      (Not my comments btw, -AM)

      [–]DimDroog 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Reverse Loving

      [–]asterias 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      What do incels have to do with it? They are banned on bannit anyway, in case you missed the note.

      [–]Feldheld 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Im pretty conservative but Ive never understood the urge to make liberals have more kids. If they want no offspring, thats totally ok with me. The world is better off without them.

      Apart from that, there is no good solution to this issue. It will always be a compromise. Reality is harsh, and I have no time for morons who think the government needs to step in and make it unicorns and rainbows. Even animals kill their newborn, quite often even.

      [–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Im pretty conservative but Ive never understood the urge to make liberals have more kids.

      Because conservatives are morons who always act contrary to their own self-interest. No wonder they always lose. The Left is evil and the Right is stupid. So do you choose evil or stupidity? I choose to reject the entire pathetic culture.

      [–]neovulcan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Seems to be everywhere. Most disappointing part for me is just how few will even entertain that the Supreme Court should never have heard a case like Roe v Wade. The Supreme Court exists to judge the constitutionality of cases, and there's nothing to base a judgment either way in the constitution or its amendments. Then factor in the 10th Amendment, and, yeah, they never should have set so many tenuous precedents.