Whoopi Goldberg ‘Shocked’ at Catching COVID Despite Being Triple Vaxxed

submitted by cottoneyejoe from summit.news

all 67 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]FlippyKing 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (63 children)

Preemptively addressing the "but how much worse would her symptoms have been if she had not been triple-vaxxed" tact because it is silly and untestable. Severity of symptoms reported by patients is entirely subjective. Being told to get vaxxed and doing it THREE TIMES already indicates someone who will go along to get along. Such a person (assuming this is all not just scripted theater for the masses) is almost guaranteed to accept the notion that what ever their symptoms were that they would have been worse than had they not been jabbed three times in such a ridiculously short period of time.

[–]dingoatemytaco 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (60 children)

Preemptively addressing the "but how much worse would her symptoms have been if she had not been triple-vaxxed" tact

Excellent approach in this case

because it is silly and untestable.

Absolutely not - as she's not as severely affected, and we know this because of billions of jabs world-wide that have helped with the data about vaccines.

Severity of symptoms reported by patients is entirely subjective.

Not entirely. One can often see when people are visibly in pain and match that with what they're saying.

Being told to get vaxxed and doing it THREE TIMES already indicates someone who will go along to get along.

Not in the least. Everyone is advised to get each jab at least 90 days apart. It's not stupid to do so. It's stupid not to do so.

Such a person (assuming this is all not just scripted theater for the masses) is almost guaranteed to accept the notion that what ever their symptoms were that they would have been worse than had they not been jabbed three times in such a ridiculously short period of time.

That is indeed the science, rather than a notion.

(Sorry - I appreciate that I am the odd one here who doesn't conform to the anti-science narratives pushed by right-wing groups, as this anti-vax movement doesn't help anyone, other than a few filthy rich people who want COVID19 to continue to spread and make them richer.)

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (55 children)

socks? Is that you?

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

I was thinking the same thing. And before too. /u/d3rr?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

Probably. I'll smote that fucker again. It has happened before.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

smote

Great word! I wanna make it an acronym for something.

[–]grassfed 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Yey socks finally perished, thanks to your hard work, I was always against him from the beginning but magnora never listened to me

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly he was only smote for 2 weeks this time. A bad decision IMO. He's back, for now.

[–][deleted]  (49 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (46 children)

    I thought you had been banned. Bummer.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    He was but it was reduced to a temp ban instead. I'll take the blame, I don't want anyone here permanently banned.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    And who the fuck are you? A sort of shadow admin? Or just a pleb imposing his preferences onto the rest of us?

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    The latter.

    [–][deleted]  (42 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Not at all, this looked like the kind of post you might make, so I asked if it's you, under the belief that your actual u/socks account had been banned. Total good faith here. ALWAYS.

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (40 children)

      I think you should leave that whole thing in the past.

      Dingo does have very similar views to you. I didn't have to argue for you, we would have had a replacement if I had just been more patient. ;)

      [–][deleted]  (33 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

        Oh, they are your alts?

        [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

        See dude, no real consequences, no real changing. The punishment is losing your account and having to start all over. This 2 week thing did nothing.

        /u/AXXA

        [–][deleted]  (18 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

            You should post it. I turned off the chat a while ago because I never saw anyone on there.

            [–]AXXA 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            Happy Epiphany Day

            [–]goonmessiah 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

            What about the people who disagree and aren’t right wing or anti-science?

            [–]dingoatemytaco 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            They're in denial.

            [–]goonmessiah 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            I think you’re in denial about such professionals existing and potentially being right.

            [–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Not entirely. One can often see when people are visibly in pain and match that with what they're saying.

            Reported symptoms is what I was referring to, not the kind where the doctor or intern or reception nurse can write down or check off something like "patient was exhibiting difficulty in breathing" or something observable. In such instances the observed symptoms would supercede the ones reported by the patient because the latter are subjective.

            Not in the least. Everyone is advised to get each jab at least 90 days apart. It's not stupid to do so. It's stupid not to do so.

            You are swapping out my "go along to get along" for your insertion of "stupid". I'm not calling it stupid, I'm saying someone who has been all jabbed up goes along to get along. I'm not calling them stupid.

            That is indeed the science, rather than a notion.

            "the science" is not a thing. Science is a process, a method if inquiry. Perhaps the most important part of the process is the replication of results by repeating the process independently. Make all data available, describe the methods in detail. Once that happens, science can begin and people can review the data and see if the results are repeated. Science with regard to this has not really begun yet.

            Don't apologize for being an apologist for the dominant narrative on this. I won't apologize for seeing you for what you are.

            [–]Canbot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            I always heard the complaints that people are so stupid and can be fooled so easily but I always thought it must be these stupid people I meet occasionally, but not really anyone I know. The amount of people I know who believe that retarded notion that "it would have been worse" is so eye opening and disheartening.

            I get that there is the rationalization that "statistical analysis proves it", but with so much evidence that everyone is manipulating data, and lying at every turn especially officials pushing the jab you really have to be retarded to keep falling for such transparent lies.

            [–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            There is a reason "corporate medicine" is frowned upon, but I fear it will become the only kind allowed anymore. Doctors have licences as individuals to practice medicine because they are not to treat patients as stats but look at the individual and unique circumstances in each case. But, since medicine has been reduced to matching a drug to symptoms, and fashion and profit, doctors might not give the matter much thought-- and when they are associated with any bigger institution, hospital but also taking insurance, the corporatization of medicine has already begun.

            The idea that statistically symptoms might be less could be valid, but there is so much obfuscation in this shit-show that it will be difficult to really say that firmly. "Delta", or "Omicron", or "Original" or "extra crispy"? What are the comorbidities or just unique individual circumstances that might influence the severity of a symptom vs another? Just as it is extremely difficult to sue a polluting corporation for some illness you get because there is very little chance of proving there product did it as opposed to the thousands of others we're all exposed to that cause similar problems, it can not be said that any individuals symptoms would have been worse or less had they done something different. It is just unprovable, even if the notion that statistically it could be valid. It is like blaming CO2 for Hurricanes Sandy or Katrina. If those hurricanes had lawyers they could point to all sorts of other, nautral, phenomena and escape blame via reasonable doubt.

            [–][deleted] 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (5 children)

            I wonder why she gave herself a fake jewish stage name.

            [–]jet199 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

            I don't.

            It's like wondering why trans teen females always call themselves Aiden or Oliver and not Dwight or Leroy.

            [–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

            Betty Whiteberg

            [–]shilldetector 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

            She talked about it in an interview years ago. She figured hollywood casting types would be more likely to invite her to auditions if they saw the last name.

            [–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            And she wasn't wrong

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            real jewish people change their name to hide it. she changes it to pretend to be jewish. clown behavior all around.

            [–]Rusty_Foster 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

            She is a puppet for the left.

            [–]Tiwaking 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

            Vaccine passports are passports to infect others. They are a passport for a train, a train to extinction.

            [–]Soloninja 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

            Vaccine passports are a complete joke. Let’s be honest

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Unless everybody gets vaccinated, this is what we’re gonna be facing for the next little while,” said Goldberg

            You'd think Whoopi would keep up better with current events considering she's probably one of the most influential women in the world due to The View.

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            another premature "infection" of a black person. Thank god she isn't in prison. Otherwise someone possibly could have noticed.

            Down the memory hole.

            [–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            WhoopingCough FakeJew

            [–]RandumbZer0 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            It's almost as if someone sucked out her brain right after her 1988 Fontaine... Why am I straight? special.

            [–]JoeyJoeJoe 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            You might like to dig and check out more actual data.

            [–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            This is probably because the virus already damaged her immune system.