Sex is not earned. Sex, love and intimacy are given to chad without effort.

submitted by winkot from self.RealIncels

Sexually "successful" men aren't doing something better, they are a joke.

Consider the fact that schopenhauer, newton etc. would have overwhelmingly likely desired casual sex yet were virgins in their old age. And even famous men who didn't die virgins still weren't able to get casual sex.

If they failed, it could very well be that you don't stand a chance. This is why normies lie about how these famous people were either gay or willingly didn't have casual sex.

If it was actually true that they didn't want sex in marriage because they were against marriage, and didn't want casual sex because they knew they couldn't succeed in it, it is because a 5/10 male should not expect to be able to achieve casual sex, this idea is literally just a psy-op.

Braggers and media will have you think that most 5/10 men will have sex but it just doesn't add up. I mean over 60% of men in the US under 30 are single according to a recent statistic, and the female gets everything out of the relationship without needing to have sex with the guy. Plus only 1 in 17 men got to even reproduce during the stone age. This assumption just ignores that, yes, women are horny but not for 5/10s.

And then there's incels AKA 4/10 men without a social circle. Oh yeah, it's certainly over.

all 31 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Mazurro 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who cares at this point bud. We are designed to die alone, however with this current state of society I am certain this entire shit show ends whenever we will go into 30-40s.

It will be us who will choose whether to hang out with single mother foids in their 30s. I will definitely refuse.

Wait for it when Instagram, TikTok and Tinder won't be for free and foids will pay money for validation. I guess some smart stinky jew thought this entire shit very well.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are correct. The men who get these whores pregnant stop dating them around 26-27. By the time they turn 30 they will pull their pants down for anyone who looks their way.

[–]greybeard 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Braggers and media will have you think that most 5/10 men will have sex but it just doesn't add up.

Even if they do, it's a very rare event. I'm certainly open to classify non-virgins as incels in the original sense of the word. I think any man that didn't have sex for more than a year is definitely involuntarily celibate

[–]AnimeRespecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

no, thats disrespectful to real incels. Your saying men who have had sex multiple times, but have been invol cels for a year are classified the same way as people who have been incel their entire lives, people who have not even held a girls hand in grade school, KHV's like me. A man who hasnt had sex for a year cant even begin to imagine what that's like.

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

True, it's not exactly the same category, trucels are meaningfully different. But I think they'd make for a useful political alliance. Maybe we should call them tempcels or newcels or something and not treat them with derision (like the name fakecel). They don't have to lurk in incel forums, but more general blackpiller forums

[–]winkot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's saying KHVs are truecels... which isn't true. They're just incel because being above them means you aren't incel at all.

Although I think a guy who was only able to have sex twice should be mad at men who get hugged without even flirting with girls, who are at a level of privilege that should be fought against.

[–]Vortex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Being handholded means you had relationships, also known as betabux. In other words - you've been scammed.

[–]AnimeRespecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

thats fine, but we already have many names for them. nearcels, failed normies, low tier normies. I dont want to treat them with derision. I like low tier normie men and think they are good to have in the blackpill cause, but I just dont want to devalue the struggle of incels.

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

alright, then we agree

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I've never had sex in my life and never plan to.

There's another thing that replaces sex for me but it's really weird.

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

the foid fears the blackpilled asexual volcel

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't hate foids and I'm actually pissed that I'm not one myself. I genuinely have no sexual desire.

[–]AnimeRespecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

sorry i said noon cares. i thought you were a foid.

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

No, Newton was not interested in casual sex. He was one of the greatest physicists and mathematicians, and an accomplished theologian and alchemist, but he saw it as his greatest accomplishment that he abstained from sexual relations his entire life.

It's really cringe how everything revolves around women and sex for you people. Go touch some grass. Or practice yoga. It will teach you how to be content without relying on anything external.

[–]winkot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If he developed that mentality in response to seeing how he isn't able to get sex, my point still stands.

You gain nothing by delusion-maxing through being an ascetic and denying that it's a part of biology to prefer casual sex over not having it. You are denying this but didn't give an argument against it. (And on top, feeling pain because you aren't able to get it is nothing unnatural.)

Ascetics were motivated by their spirituality and metaphysics. That's why it's delusional. And what does a secular ascetic gain? He maybe gets to rid himself of the pain of unfulfilled desires by basically gutting his own psychology, and only keeping the desire to avoid pain (Otherwise he wouldn't be doing it.) and to stay alive. So there's that, but it's difficult to imagine that that's the first option for someone.

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You answered your own question: the answer is to discover a spirituality. The opposite of loneliness is to have connection with people; human beings by nature want to be part of something that's bigger than themselves, and there are different paths toward this. When you discover the nature of the soul and learn that this is the same for everyone, you get closer to others. You develop an authentic compassion for people, start focusing on helping others, and you'll learn to live in the moment and find joy in little things. That's what leads to happiness, not an embrace of lust or putting your individuality at the centre of your experience.

[–]sneako 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

that 60 percent stat is cap. 80-90 percent of men are incel. probably more. it's the 99-1 rule in the modern world

[–]winkot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Absolutely. Every statistic is biased since the human tendency to lie is incredible.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

There’s a reason for it. Chads are built, healthy, strong, and contribute to society. Women are attracted to that because they naturally live a good life with them, its good genes.

They can also beat your ass and my ass.

You are correct but focus on your self.

You are focused on things you can’t change. You can change your self.

[–]AnimeRespecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Chads are built, healthy, strong

chads arent neccisarily strong. look at xqc, you can be a tall, white, good jawline guy and still be a skinny twink lol

and contribute to society

chads definitly dont contribute as much to society as incels.

Women are attracted to that because they naturally live a good life with them

life with a chad vs ugly boyfriend is literally the same for a woman she just percieves life with the chad as being better, because she like the way he looks.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I’m not sure XqC is a chad.

[–]AnimeRespecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

he is in the sense that he is in the top 20% of what an american woman would find attractive. even if he wasnt its still true that you can be a tall, white, good jawline guy and still be a skinny unhealthy twink.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

We have different definitions of chad. A chad is not a rich guy who gets laid cause he’s rich. That’s called a rich guy.

[–]AnimeRespecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

its true that a chad slays because of his features, and not his money, but I already said

its still true that you can be a tall, white, good jawline guy and still be a skinny unhealthy twink.

in such a senario rich or not you would be in the top 20%

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I understand your point.

Do you hate XqC?

[–]AnimeRespecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

i know next to nothing about him, so no. I guess it seemed like I did lol

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You might like these men you call “chad” more than you think. I find the incel community, man I relate to you guys. I think the same things as you.

But sometimes it’s your self standing in your way.

Do you remember the famous incel shooter? He had everything, he was good looking, he was rich, he had nice cars.

But like. Look man. From a woman’s point of view, they have to stay away from men who are TOO interested. TOO nice. TOO invested.

Thoes are the kinds of men who kill you when you step slightly out of line. You know, get beat for making a sandwich.

Sometimes men give off a scary vibe. And men don’t understand that because we’re trying to duck everything that moves.

[–]AnimeRespecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You might like these men you call “chad” more than you think

I dont like or dislike chads as a blanket statement., im friends with some and hate others if think they're annoying, no offense but you may have a tendency to assume things.

Do you remember the famous incel shooter? He had everything, he was good looking, he was rich, he had nice cars

elliot rodger was an tard who never actually used an incel forum or called himself an incel

From a woman’s point of view, they have to stay away from men who are TOO interested. TOO nice. TOO invested. Thoes are the kinds of men who kill you when you step slightly out of line. You know, get beat for making a sandwich. Sometimes men give off a scary vibe. And men don’t understand that because we’re trying to duck everything that moves.

im not overly nice to women. Ive never gotten far enough to be too invested either, i always get rejected straight away.

[–]BuriBurizaemon3108 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tbh, I have been contemplating on stockholmmaxxing some 4-5/10 girl with really low self-esteem and is really introverted and loner type who is not much close with her family. I bet it would be a win for her as well as she would get someone who actually gives a fuck about her and I am 184.2cms tall with good frame as well if she were to ignore my face lol.

[–]BuriBurizaemon3108 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plus only 1 in 17 men got to even reproduce during the stone age. This assumption just ignores that, yes, women are horny but not for 5/10s.

Tbh, I have a different theory for it to occur. My assumption is that in stone age, it hardly ever was the case of who the women was attracted for but was the case of who's strong enough to survive and get to keep the women. I think that in many cases the stronger males even killed off the spawn of the man who they defeated and kept the women all for himself making such a thing occur.