In 392 BC, the Greek playwright Aristophanes wrote a play called "Ekklesiazousai" which translates to "The Assembly Woman". The play was created for two purposes 1) To make fun of the current congress saying that women would be more efficient than them by enacting a radical agenda, 2)To show what happens when women get power. The ancient Greeks knew back then that giving women power leads to massive welfare, sexual liberation, and other communist ideas. The founding fathers knew this when they wrote the constitution allowing only "white, land-owning men in good standing" the right to vote. Currently, only the "good standing" part remains with many prominent democrats and left wing politicians like Bernie Sanders attempting to get rid of that as well.
The play goes as such:
A group of women, led by the wise and redoubtable Praxagora, has decided that the women of Athens must convince the men to give them control of the city, as they are convinced they can do a better job. Disguised as men, the women sneak into the assembly and command the majority of votes needed to carry their series of revolutionary proposals, even convincing some of the men to vote for it on the grounds that it is the only thing they have not tried.
Once in power, Praxagora realizes that she has to come up with some novel and radical proposals. She and the other women then institute a communist-like government in which the state feeds, houses and generally takes care of every Athenian. Both property and women are to be henceforth held in common, and they enforce an idea of equality by allowing every man to sleep with every woman, so long as the man first sleeps with an ugly woman before he may sleep with a beautiful one.
All slaves are to be publicly owned, and are to to carry out the work currently done by poor people leaving everyone else to live a life of leisure. All individual households are to be knocked together to form a communal dwelling and all citizens are to dine at the public expense in the various public halls of the city, the particular place of each being determined by lot.
The play ends with a gigantic communal banquet (the elaborate menu of which is given in burlesque) and with the jubilation of the women over their triumphs.
there doesn't seem to be anything here