Can someone please explain one thing to me. Has the person who has access to the nuclear launch button been deemed too dangerous to have a Twitter account?

submitted by Tegra from self.RussianFolkWisdom

Can someone please explain one thing to me. Has the person who has access to the nuclear launch button been deemed too dangerous to have a Twitter account?

all 2 comments
sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun

[–]StrategicTactic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I will assume your question is in good faith. There is a difference between twitter and the government, which is not recognized in your question. The government would be one who deems someone "too dangerous", but I am not aware of that being a crime itself. Twitter deemed Trump to have violated their terms of service, which is apparently open to interpretation as many otherwise overt calls to violence have not been censored.

I can only assume that Twitter thinks some people should be treated differently than others, based upon an arbitrary metric which looks to be political in nature. I came to that conclusion long before the 2016 election.

[–]Tegra[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Read the group description ffs