How far does Saidit's anti-porn rule go?

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

So obviously that means you don't want pics or videos of a sexual nature to be uploaded on Saidit, but what about subs for erotic stories, whether real or fictional? Fetish discussion subs? Where exactly is the line drawn?

all 52 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]wuzizname 57 insightful - 18 fun57 insightful - 17 fun58 insightful - 18 fun -  (13 children)

Don't you coomers have enough places online for porn already ffs?

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Porn is not allowed here, so what's your problem?

[–]wuzizname 37 insightful - 8 fun37 insightful - 7 fun38 insightful - 8 fun -  (7 children)

The coomers want to flood the world with porn.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

What are coomers?

[–]Lostcarkeys 35 insightful - 4 fun35 insightful - 3 fun36 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Porn addicts and chronic masturbators. If you feel you need to create a sub to share porn, you're a coomer.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

TIL

[–]denverkris 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

or, if you frequent such places.

[–]dong_master 20 insightful - 5 fun20 insightful - 4 fun21 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Masturbation addicts. Degenerates and their weird ass fetishes.

[–]Nwabudike_Morgan 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

/r/coomers "was banned due to a violation of Reddit’s content policy against harassing content."

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's just an excuse.

[–]Nwabudike_Morgan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I interpret it as reddit doesn't like it when people are mocked for masturbating.

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I interpret it as excessive masturbation is harmful, and the powers that reddit represents don't want us getting better. In fact, the entire idea is to destroy our culture to make way for the paradise they intend to build, but we know for a fact will fail and turn into a dystopia.

[–]magnora7 41 insightful - 5 fun41 insightful - 4 fun42 insightful - 5 fun -  (11 children)

Discussion is fine, no pics, no children even in text. Also probably take the sub off of /all because it will drag the quality of discussion down

[–]missdaisycan 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

If violence/ degradation/misogyny to women fetish shows up, would the equivalent to men fetish also be allowed? Asking ahead of time.

[–]magnora7 20 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Advocating violence is not allowed. There are no gender-specific rules

[–]bobbobbybob 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

some subs have gender specific rules.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]missdaisycan 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I'm here cause Reddit, where there are separate rules for men and women regarding speech. (I hope there are no sex specific rules.)

    [–]yishengqingwa666 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    LOL

    [–]catoboros 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I am pleased, for once, to agree with your LOL.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Okay, cool. Was thinking of reaching out to some at-risk subs to see if they were willing to jump ship, but I wanted to be sure first just how comfortable you are with NSFW content. Because I could see the argument being made that This One Time At Band Camp type stories could also be considered porn.

    [–]bobbobbybob 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    why not fork saidit's code and make coomfit or something

    [–]tuesday 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    hahahaha. the only "porn" at reddit which is at risk of being banned, is probably really really super awful. And by "awful" I mean "incitement to violence and/or incitement to disregard consent".

    [–]Antifa 28 insightful - 6 fun28 insightful - 5 fun29 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

    Fuuuuuuck all that noise. The complete absence of sexual degeneracy here is so refreshing.

    [–]dong_master 28 insightful - 5 fun28 insightful - 4 fun29 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

    Let's not make this attractive for a bunch of fucking degenerate coomers.

    [–]Realwoman 25 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 3 fun26 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Please no

    [–]bald-janitor 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Please go

    [–]peety 24 insightful - 4 fun24 insightful - 3 fun25 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    <deleted>

    [–]bobbobbybob 12 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 7 fun13 insightful - 8 fun -  (3 children)

    saidit unites the left, the right, the kike, the nazis, everyone. To say "NO PRON PLEASE".

    I hear wattpad is where all the kids go to share their masturbatory fantasies.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Wattpad has became synonymous with horny weeaboos.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    TIL wattpad.

    [–]Hadza 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    the kike

    NO PRON PLEASE

    (X)

    [–]Questionable 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Sadit doesn't have the resources to police an erotics image board, let alone read through pages and pages of eroticism for potential issues. One wrong sentence, fight club comes to mind, and the whole site can be seized.

    [–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Since when can a site be seized on the basis of erotic text?

    [–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Sorry, more likely shut down by the host after having pressure applied. Not really a difference though. One is governmental wrong think, the other is corporate.

    [–]Edge_Finder 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    i insta block any porn, i really dont wanna see the pictures that you are jerking off too

    one of the reasons I like this place

    [–]Lilith_Fair 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Just go here and leave us all alone: s/antipornography. Or go back to Reddit

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Fucking coomers. You have reddit and so many sites for porn. Fuck off coomer.

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I think /u/magnora7 is the only one who can ultimately answer. Might have to DM him too if he doesn't see this (post the answer here though I am curious)

    [–]Chipit 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Aren't there already enough resources for porn on the internet? WTF? Seriously F off.

    [–]GalaxyDiarrhea 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

    Didn't realize there were so many pure and holy men on saidit. So masturbation and porn now makes you "degenerate coomers"? I'm not worthy to be among such high and holy men. I'll return to my sewer O Holy Ones!

    [–]JoeSeratt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Come to https://nab.cx

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Helpful hint: women also exist and post on this site

    [–]soundsalad 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Jesus Christ what the fuck is wrong with these people commenting?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    All of the feminist, gender critical, and anti porn subs were banned from reddit during the ban wave so a disproportionate amount of those people are here now.

    [–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Masturbation addicts unite!

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    /s/Sex was started for anything and everything related to it - except porn and pejoratives. It was to include sexism and gender discussions, but in the last month we've suddenly got no shortage of options for that. There is a rich history to erotica and eros literature that also faced censorship issues so they had to get creative and/or go underground. I delved into that for a while before the Internet was a thing.

    /s/PinUps was started but I need to finish the /s/WikiSpooks CSS theme before I can copy it over to /s/PinUps (and to /s/GreenParty) but with different duotones. Anyone can use it if compelled, but I won't until the theme is ready. The idea is for sexy yet tasteful, potentially erotic images with fap potential but a primary focus on aesthetics, style, and culture - preferably with something to learn about with each image. I was considering making a graffiti sub too, then someone made /s/StreetArt (then deleted their account) which is a better more expansive name and could have included what I had in mind for /s/PinUps.

    Q: How does this post have 2 other discussions? Edit: A: They redirect here.

    [–]binrobinro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I know it when I see it.

    [–]Myrkskog 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I suppose the easiest means of discrimination is imagery. Having said that, everything is on a continuum, right? An erotic passage needs reading to determine it's lasciviousness, whereas a pasted image will instantly be presented to the viewer. But, again, I may have a 'line' drawn much closer to beginning of the continuum than the next. Context is important, too, eh. It may seem a pointless differentiation, but at least with smut that adheres to a particular communities 'rules', i.e. cosplay or whatever else exists close to that milieu, may have at least a semblance of what acceptable or not. Smut for smuts sake is porn in my view and as people have stated, there's enough of that on the internet.

    I guess in short, people can police themselves, I suppose.