all 29 comments

[–]Foidblaster9000 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

If you have a better experience on Reddit, it makes sense to go back there doesn't it?

[–]chottohen 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I see what you did there.

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I use both sites.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

How strongly do you approve of pedophilia?

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

0%

[–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's difficult to use reddit without at least tacitly approving or supporting pedophilia. (IMO) That's not their only issue, but it's one of the more disagreeable problems they have.

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Well, I don't support gassing the jews, yet here I am.

[–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Found the kike

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And suddenly it makes sense that he wants to remove barriers to dragging debate into the gutter and destroying it.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

There are two states where self-gassing by jews is prohibited. If no one were willing to gas the jews, they'd end up having to take the bus.

[–]chottohen 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

The IPs that called you names or sent you certain images, may be bots or humans whose job it is to discourage users in hopes they will leave saidit. Any user name could be a bot, including you.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

No true saiditor.

[–]chottohen 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I thought you knew me better than that.

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

They're real users that I know. And lol no one on saidit is being paid.

[–]chottohen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

How did you come by that info?

They're real users that I know.

That's what they want you to think. You can never be too paranoid.

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. Yes you can.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

you must be a shills if really denying shills exist

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Tiwaking 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The censorship is genuinely worse than reddit.

Press X to Doubt

X

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Why would anyone ever read their DMs?

[–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

that just gave mods exzcuse to ban and censor based on feels and not have to explain it, they don't want actual rules that are easy to understand and argue against when they're bad rules.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think the pyramid of debate adherence should be on a sub by sub basis and if Admin thinks a sub doesn't follow the pyramid they can take them off the new feed. Obviously if admin abuses that and takes off subs just because of personal prejudice then it becomes a problem. However, this allows a degree of flexibility with subs that want to be more free speech and/or comedy oriented. The pyramid certainly doesn't work well with meme and comedy subs. Maybe the non participating sub could be tagged as not following the pyramid but still allowed on the new feed. I wouldn't really want to quarantine those subs but new users should be aware that trolling, insults and low quality discussion are allowed on the sub.

I've always thought the pyramid works better for subs that advertise as debate subs. Because debate subs are advertising outsiders to come in and 'debate' and if that's the case a certain set of rules should apply to the conversations.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Aw poor thing

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I hate you.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Then you hate u/bald-janitor too

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]AXXA[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    /u/FuckYourMom please think of the Pyramid of Debate when you comment, and if you are going up or down it. Please don't drag discussion down on the Pyramid of Debate.

    /s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

    [–]yabbit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Agree. If you want to make a site fun the fewer rules the better.