use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
s/ClimateSkeptics
Anti-methane vaccine could reduce the huge climate impact of cow burps
submitted 2 months ago by ZephirAWT from newscientist.com
[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
Anti-methane vaccine could reduce the huge climate impact of cow burps (archive)
[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
Fake scientists.
[–]topiary2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
So this is how they will kill all the cows.
[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 month ago (0 children)
How I lost trust in scientists I want to explain how my experience in physics had me lose trust in scientists, and that indeed I was highly sceptical of climate change a decade ago. I looked at the science -- and scientists -- very closely.
Dr.. Hossenfelder is a robust part of scientific community problem - after all, she was quite convenient mainstream physicist engaged in abstract concepts just very recently. I would even understand that she doesn't like string theory and extradimensions personally - but why she has so many publications just about extradimensions after then? Actually more than some average string physicist... - just for smooth carrier as she once admitted? Even starting her speech with labelling psychic research as an (example of) pseudoscience speaks for itself: one can not learn an old ignorant the very new tricks:
Unfortunately it turned out that climate change is not a hoax. Yes, climate models have some problems which I’ve talked about a few times before, but their biggest problem seems to be that they underestimate the pace of warming and the uncertainty. I’ve found that climate scientists clearly do have social problems in their community. But these problems present themselves totally differently than in the foundations of physics. In the foundations of physics, scientists basically seem to have concluded that they don’t need to care about what the public thinks, they’ll get paid anyway, so now they just ignore all criticism. Climate scientists in contrast, are afraid of the public. They’re afraid of being hunted by activists on either the left or right side, and of having their privacy being violated and of being quoted out of context. They’re afraid of being called alarmist. They’re afraid of being harassed by climate deniers.
One can clearly see that Dr. Hossenfelder doesn't accuse scientists from activism and climate hoax but exactly vice-versa: she perceives them as too timid and catious, because problem of progressivist alarmism is on the side of Hossenfelder instead. This is because Hossenfelder still doesn't see what many climatologists already realized: the pace of global warming is not dependent on carbon dioxide levels.
[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]topiary2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)