all 26 comments

[–][deleted] 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I never understood why trannies are even allowed into the LGB community in the first place. Absolute majority of these fuckers are exclusuvely attracted to the opposite genitals and regulary have heterosexual sex with the opposite gender. A literal crossdressing heteros with the extra steps. Homos are fucking retarted for tolerating and openly supporting this shit.

[–]jacques1102[S] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's mostly because of this whole idea that both groups were oppressed and discriminated in the past.Not to mention,i herd pro trans gays claiming that they're challenging the cis hetro normative society by claiming that a large portion of people aren't fully straight or cis.That's why you see these new sexualities and gender identities that are popping up.Even when these new sexualities(asexual,demisexual,pansexual,etc.)have nothing to do with same sex attraction, and not only that but no where in history was someone discriminated against because they chose not to have sex or wait until marriage.

[–][deleted] 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

These cretins don't "challenge" anyone or anything, they only prove the right wingers right.

Also, all this "demisexual, asexual, pansexual" bullshit are also just another flavors of heterosexualism made by the insecure and confused heterosexual teenage girls.

[–]Newzok 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah it's suspicious to me. It's 100% a social media thing along with the trans wave. Let's see whether it crashes and burns now that twitter isn't a limited hangout anymore.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no where in history was someone discriminated against because they chose not to have sex

Actually they usually have been. It's been seen the same way as homosexuality: not fulfilling your reproductive obligation. Historically some cultures even tolerated gay sex as long as you were also having heterosexual sex and having lots of children. Those physically incapable of reproducing were also punished.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because at first the hate received by gays in the form of homophobia was due to gender nonconformity within a conservative and right wing society. Effeminate gay men got it worse because 1 they couldn't hide and 2 they more clearly violated the gender rules which all gays violated by refusing to get married and have 2.5 children. If you look at some other conservative and hierarchical societies like Japan, gay men will get into hookup culture then often get married to a woman anyway in order to not bring shame to the family. Sexism played a huge role in society creating a situation where women weren't even considered in the thought process of people angry about gays violating gender norms. The focus has historically been directed towards "failed men" who didn't become fathers.

This created solidarity between gay men and anyone else who was gender nonconforming in any way because we were all breaking the same rule in society. In game of thrones there's an expression that all dwarves are bastards in the eyes of their fathers and basically all effeminate men were fags in the eyes of society. Gender bending in the 80s was a clear attack against right wing concepts of gender. It was a rebellion against gender (the social caste system) where many straight people felt liberated to dress and act in ways which were supposed to be reserved for the opposite sex.

In the 90s and 00s the pop culture dress code became far more conservative. At the time i thought this was a good thing because while 80s outfits were proving a good point and were liberating, they did tend to make people look ridiculous. The 90s became "I don't care about my outfit" grunge and the 00s became "perhaps men and women should dress differently because it compliments their bodies differently so I care about my outfit again" sexed clothing. This coincided with a DRAMATIC change in popular perception about gay people.

Keep in mind the long standing solidarity within the gay community surrounding gender nonconformity and now society was starting to shift from extreme disgust to indifference. The simultaneous shift to more conservative views on gendered clothing with society still seeing gays as persecuted created a vacuum where certain people could easily jump in the driver's seat and run the car off the road. Straight with extra steps Cluster-B personality disorders were suddenly viewed as having moral superiority simply by existing and they were rewarded for acting out.

Gays didn't choose to exist suddenly with these people. It was the result of cultural momentum.

[–]Datachost 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A variety of reasons. There are those who are afraid of speaking out. There are those who fell for "You know how you guys were treated? That's how we're being treated now" and can't be bothered to even give it a cursory glance before believing it. Then there are the "I'm alright, Jack"s, gay people who are married or in longterm relationships who don't care what effect it has on younger gay people, they know they'll never have to prove they actually mean what they're saying and it makes them look good.

[–]clownworlddropout 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their whole ideology is untenable, nobody in their right mind thinks gender lives in a vacuum separate from sex or that a person's stated "gender identity" is worth any more than a polite nod and a right-then-anyway. This era and this utter, utter, nonsense is an embarrassment to our society that future generations will cringe at. I just hope they'll know not all of us were batshit crazy.

[–]jet199 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lets face it, a lot of gay men are just selfish arseholes and they see trans as a trojan horse to get their dodgy stuff socially accepted (bad behaviour, sexual incontinence, kink, misogyny, victimhood narrative, and let's not talk about the kids) just as much as the troons are using gay people.

[–]alladd 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Because trans people make gay people look normal by comparison.

"Oh you thought a man kissing a man was weird? How about a man who chops his dick off and dresses in thongs and diapers so he can have heterosexual sex with a woman while calling himself a baby lesbian? Yeah being gay ain't so weird anymore is it"

[–]Wanderingthehalls 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Up until relatively recently there was a clear distinction between transsexual and transvestite, both of which come under transgender now. There are a hell of a lot more of the latter, which are straight men with a fetish for themselves as a woman. Whereas most of the old school transsexuals were gay men who wanted to be women to justify their attraction to men and have more men be attracted to them, people like Blair White for example. So it was natural that these men were included by adding the T, because they were gay men. Adding the T was at the time an acknowledgement of biological reality.

It's only since the move was made to make all men in dresses transgender and the inclusion of transvestites as part of the "community" that it became a massive contradiction. But it was done slowly enough that a lot of LGB people and "allies" haven't cottoned on to the fact that the Trojan horse is full of perverts.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not caused by internalized homophobia. There's way more too it than that.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Certainly a lot of gays like larping a trad hetro relationship and dislike effeminate twinks. That's not so much homophobia but taste.

[–]NerveActive 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It started because in the past most trans people were homosexual (for example, a MTF who is attracted to men). Now that it changed, LGB still support the T because they are being brainwashed by the media or are scared of speaking against it. For many gay people, LGBT spaces are the only places we can receive help/support or find other people like ourselves and not feel so alone, so the thought of being kicked out of them is scary. Besides, if you get branded a transphobe you are fucked, you will be doxxed, treated like shit and maybe even lose your job and be physically assaulted.

[–]Newzok 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

All of this shit is down to them confusing sex and gender, yet again. But they're being conflated after being said to be separate by the same people.

So, I'm attracted to your sex, not really your gender. Gender is just your, like, social role and not really interesting unless it corresponds to your sex. I'm a homosexual, not a homogenderophiliac or whatever. Your pronoun, social role, clothing are entirely secondary to your sex.

[–]Alan_Crowe 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sex and Gender are like Mass and Weight. Technically different, but much the same on the surface of planet Earth.

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The only people in the lgbt who support the groomer tranny pedos are groomer tranny pedos and middle class white liberal women.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So honestly, I think if you want to look into it, we actually don't know that much about human sexuality beyond things self-reported. There's no DNA test or blood test we can do or any kind of physical marker we can point at that indicates if one is gay or not. (Or trans) And while people say that their sexuality has always been the way it has been, and I'm certain they believe that, there's always been other documented cases of people who go through a "phase" and then eventually stop being "gay". Or they figure out they weren't gay the whole time, or something. With a lack of any real scientific evidence for a "root cause of gayness", there's some studies that show autism is more common with gay people, but not all autistics are gay and not all gay people are autistic either, so it's not really a cause.

Where I think the issue began to get conflated was how being gay was "treated" in the past, by torturing the gay people or sterilizing them until they stopped being gay, which was horrid. And the popular cultural trend of believing it was an unchangeable innate trait began to take hold then. I've never believed it to be a conscious choice. But I do think that being gay might be similar to how fetishes work, in that they aren't exactly innate, there may be some kind of genetic influence there, but developmental experiences might also trigger it. I don't think it's well understood by anyone really and we're dealing with a very inexact science of human sexuality.

So I think simply with the pretty shit treatment that gay people got in the past when they were treated like a disease and castrated or tortured into choosing to be straight, the gay community as a whole is understandably very anthemic to ideas like there's any component of choice or mental abnormalities behind sexuality, since they believe (correctly I believe) that you'll have people use that as justification to either discriminate against gay people or to justify various attempts at conversion therapy or whatnot. So when it comes to trans people, I think they apply the same logic, even though one could argue that sex reorientation is a form of conversion therapy itself. I have a personal suspicion that trans-identification is more likely in very conservative areas with strictly defined gender rolls. But it's also important to point out that I think there's about four or so different root causes behind trans-identification as well and it's merely an umbrella term we use to describe everyone who identifies as the opposite sex regardless of why they are doing so.

[–]jacques1102[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The only study that i remember in regards to homosexuality is the same argument Ts use now with their brains not matching.TBF there were gays that were skeptical of these studies since it would basically prove that homosexuality doesn't exist in a psychological sense since their brains would be the opposite sexs.In fact, i think countries like iran even use these studies to force gay men to translate.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I believe that study was fairly inconclusive. It showed some similarities but not enough to make a definitive observation.

The problem is you need to describe what exactly the difference is between a "male" brain and a "female" brain. I'll concede that hormones likely effect brain chemistry. But in that case it's not the brain that is male or female but the hormonal expression is causing differences in brain chemistry no?

[–]jacques1102[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In which case wouldn't that mean that the brains were more masculine or feminine depending on what it produces?Neither which would prove a male or female brain since we know of tomboys and feminine guys existing.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People's natural hormonal levels can vary. That might effect brain chemistry. Beyond that I can't say. I'm very skeptical of any claims towards "sexed brains".

I first heard the concept several decades ago, not from trans activists, but by christian fundamentalist dominionists as a biological explanation for strict gender rolls.

It's possible there's some overarching statistical prevalence of certain differences along sex lines across the entire population. But it's not logical to assume that someone whose brain chemistry is deviant from the statistical majority is somehow the opposite sex. Sex is defined by reproductive capability and the only thing that matters is what gametes are produced. (Or would be produced in cases of infertility).

[–]Fiyanggu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Group think is not conducive to critical thinking. Also, the echo chambers ad not conducive to free exchanges or debate. You either fall in line or you're banned. Now that toxic attitude has move to real life with real repercussions for people who dare to express thoughts that are no in line with woke virtue. A hilarious example of this is DeLeon, the LA councilman who refuses to step down for his participation in conversation with other Hispanic council members where one of them called the adopted black son of another council member, a little monkey in Spanish. She was immediately canceled and had to step down, but he's clinging on to power. If he's successful, you can expect to see him reaching for power at the national level maybe as a senator or congressman and more. I'm sure Newsom will try to work with him. And then you'll see the contagion of left coast madness infecting DC even more.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What i find very bizarre is that i've seen stories on the lgbt subreddits where whenever their partner comes out as trans that the homosexual person needs to respect their partners choice and identity despite being uncomfortable with it.What gives?

People are making up shit for karma on Reddit?

I mean I'd not be surprised if some of these cases are real. But I think most stuff on Reddit is made up now.

There's a subreddit /r/mypartneristrans or something that's supposed to be a support group for partners of trans people. And I've browsed it a couple of times and gotten widely the sense that, most partners are not happy with it. But anyone posting there is already not in the "Lol why put up with it just break up" camp because they'd already have done it, or they'd be banned for saying it. So are the people there real? Or is it just trans people larping for what their "ideal" partner should be so they can then send their partner over there and go "look see these people made it work"

Tbf though I think almost all the relationship stuff on Reddit is fake.

[–]jacques1102[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree with this and it's not just reddit.I wonder if it's the same with all social media in general.I'm in a official discord for this show and a lot of people on here claim to transgender or LGBT in general to the point where it feels like i'm the only hetrosexual/cis person on here.I kept thinking to myself"Are there really that many fans that are LGBT"?But then i started realizing a lot of people on here are claiming to be the new sexualities like asexual,aromantic,pansexual,etc.It's like these people are trying very hard to be a part of group to feel special when they really aren't.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Don't be in any servers Discord might not like. If they ban one they will probably sentence every single person in it to death.