Gay men are gender non-confirming just for being gay? That's the oldest insult in the book for gay men. That we're not "real men" or that we "act like women." Go fuck yourself.

submitted by BenitoGreen99 from i.imgur.com

all 43 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]ClassroomPast6178 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They’re really trying to trans away the gay.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Oh look, someone trying to make sure the LGB cart stays firmly hitched to the T horse as it heads for the cliff's edge.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Is a man who identifies as a woman and willfully embodies every sexist stereotype of women cough cough Dylan Mulvaney "non-conforming"?

[–]Datachost 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly, under gender ideology there's no such thing as gender non conforming. You're just confirming to your gender, which may he different from your sex. Someone born female and is a massive tomboy isn't actually GNC, they're a closeted transman.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's just unfair.

This falls under the "cult" factor of "everyone is [x], they just don't know it yet!", so "tomboy" has nothing to do with it, they'll find an excuse for ANYONE.

To those people, all except a literal stereotypical action hero/Barbie doll is GNC and thus a closeted trans person...and if they ARE a literal stereotypical action hero/Barbie doll? Well, they're in such an ironclad closet they cloak themselves in every gender stereotype to hide them being trans.

[–]UncleWillard56 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

The LGBT community needs a pope or a grand queer (I'd say queen, but that doesn't narrow it down) to rule on all this shit once and for all.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I think they call it an antichrist.

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I just call them daddy.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most trans people have zero gender non-conforming personality traits.

Having a weird fetish is literally the most male thing possible and self harming the most female thing.

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The troons are trying to conversation therapy your ass, my gay brother.

[–]JulienMayfair 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No one is more obsessed with conforming to gender stereotypes than the T. That's because gender stereotypes are the foundation of much of it.

1990: You're a tomboy -> Great! You're a gender non-conforming woman.
2020: You're a tomboy -> you're really a man.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Most Fags are not uncool weirdos. They are not connected to the trans community at all.

[–]blackpoop321 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's right. All non-straight or simply non-bigots are LGBTQIA+. The '+' stands for limitless inclusion, so they do stand with pedophiles, zoophiles.

[–]clownworlddropout 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nobody is more hung up on gender than a troon, wtf they mean gender nonconforming? Trooning out is all about conforming to a gender, it just happens to be the opposite one.

[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

There are no old gays, they all die of AIDS by the time they're 52.

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

they all die of AIDS

Viral HIV-AIDS was hoax. They died from poisoning by AZT.

They were murdered.

[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Of course, you know I don't believe in viruses. But whatever it was, "AIDS" was a real illness.

[–]BISH 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Immune deficiency is real.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why is immune deficiency a problem if there are no viruses?

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why is immune deficiency a problem if there are no viruses?

The immune system is largely misunderstood.

Infection is real. Toxicity is real.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you're saying that the immune system removes poison from the body?

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In my view it is just one very apparent sign of a profound imbalance. But there are fungi and molds, for example.

[–]ace-wolf 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

…You don’t believe in viruses?

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nope, there is no evidence they exist, if you take the deep dive, there is NOTHING. It's all just a tall tale.

[–]ace-wolf 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Am I missing a joke or have you never seen images of viruses taken with microscopes? I genuinely cannot tell

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

tl;dr: Viruses don't exist. What is photographed as 'viruses' are exosomes, which are perfectly healthy and natural. But misconstruing these as 'disease vectors' has allowed Big Pharma to poison and thus dumb down people as babies, as well as profit immensely.

Oh, I have. I can also make you an image just like that one and write "fighter jet" as a caption underneath. Point: SAYING that's what they are and DEMONSTRATING their functioning as viruses is something else.

Here's an interesting experiment: Take a normal, healthy cell. Damage it, poison it, and stress it strongly using various methods. Then you can use a microscope and observe the same "tiny vesicles containing genetic material" (that's what a 'virus' is, isn't it?) get EXPRESSED by these cells. Take a still photo. Voila, that is your 'virus'. Now these steps of "poison, damage and stress" are standardized into "test kits" which you can use in lab settings. Nobody makes their own anymore, but originally that's how it was done.

'Viruses' don't exist. What exist are EXOSOMES which are expressed by cells to communicate information about the attack they are being subjected to, to other neighboring cells.

The famous "Polio is proof" is ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. DDT, a very toxic product, was used in spraying apples. People ate those apples. Some people got very sick with poliomyelitis. Solution? Invent a bullshit story about 'viruses' which in all honesty may very well have been 'true' without having been REAL. MEANING: Yes, these 'tiny vesicles containing genetic informaion' were likely to be found around 'polio' sick cells, but they were simply exosomes. Easy to misconstrue in order to misinform and swindle the uneducated public and sell them TA-DAAA! "Vaccines" which only screw up your immune system into ATTACKING YOURSELF. Of course they surrepticiously stopped spraying DDT when they introduced this sham "vaccine" bullshit.

And voila, it just keeps going to this day, injecting babies with mercury, defective DNA and other horrors. The governments are complicit, the doctors are taught that vaccines are health, and you are on your own.

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I heard that AZT is some nasty shit.

[–]BISH 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A "cancer drug" that's more deadly than cancer.

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't Fauci behind it?

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then it's literally a CANCER drug... :P

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What about all the people in Africa who died with no treatment?

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What about all the people in Africa who died with no treatment?

That's a good question. They weren't given an AIDS test either.

They died of starvation, etc.
Starvation causes a collapse in immune response.

[–]sproketboy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Gay people belong in the oven. Hetero only - every Tuesday, twice on Sunday. That is all.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gender identity theory was invented in a time long before gender roles got a whole less relevant in the 90s.

Trying to apply this dated theory invented by a pedophile to modern times causes these issues.

[–]Datachost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

At this point I honestly can't tell which Cathy Brennan is loopier. I guess at least this one hasn't been actively violent, though it is proof perfect that you can get deep enough into radical feminism that you end up homophobic

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

get deep enough into radical feminism that you end up homophobic

Haven't the radfems always been less than friendly towards gay men though? Back on the old TiA, I occasionally saw content that showed what radfems think about gay men, and it wasn't anything good. Of course, when the radfems themselves moved into the sub, those posts were quickly disappeared, so it's been awhile since I read anything about that.

[–]OuroborosTheory 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"double patriarchy"--they're masculine, AND they have no wombxn around so who knows what misogyny they get up to without an Oberlin-trained supervisor to rein in the Devil's Chromosome

(I mean, try contradicting some bilge on FB by saying "hey, I'm a gay guy," they hate that more than FUCKING HUWHITE MALES)

also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_lesbianism

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Radfems have long been driven by an irrational hatred of men that goes far beyond any legitimate complaints. Find shit like the scum mannifesto where they essentially call for the enslavement and genocide of men.

Since gay men are still men they aren't immune from the hate.

[–]wylanderuk 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Pretty much, but then again which group are they not hostile to?

Pretty sure at lest some of them has described gay men as the ultimate misogynists because they are not attracted to women or as they put it "gay men hate women so much they are attracted to other men"...

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I noticed that radfems seem to get especially triggered by MGTOW guys, as if the latter deciding to opt out of the game entirely is somehow not allowed. It wouldn't surprise me if gay guys were disliked for a similar reason.

[–]OuroborosTheory 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

look at the "conditions" for "allowing" a men's center with 1% the budget of the women's center 2014: the radfems get absolute control over every aspect of its operation, and the men will have to admit that whatever problems they have is because of the patriarchy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxAEBMfy7Pw

I've seen less restrictive ultimatums from the 19th-century Prussian Army

[–]wylanderuk 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah they are really bothered by MGTOW, but TBFH that does that range from "fuck it, i'm out" to "all women are cunts".

And that is coming from a guy that is technically one, but not for any ideological or political reason and was one long before i had ever heard of it.

[–]Datachost 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They can be pretty lesbophobic too at least certain factions. The stuff with gay men is often just bickering/banter between them and lesbians, with gay men giving as well as they get

I think this Cathy Brennan just isn't a particularly well woman, she's constantly lashing out at other people, often for no reason. She has a real hate boner for Kellie Jay Keen, she's lashed out at UK feminists only to be buddy buddy with them not long after. Just a weird woman