/s/VaccineInjuries - A new sub for documenting vaccine injuries and deaths.

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.VaccineInjuries

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

/s/VaccineInjuries

Because /u/socks is a lying idiot I've created this new sub for documenting vaccine injuries and deaths.

Perhaps keeping track of example stories may help persuade people of the greater problems of corrupt "authorities" and their eugenics programs.

Maybe you have other ideas that this sub can be utilized for.

It might be worth developing a system of posting instructions in the sidebox. For example, a rule might be to post the name(s), region(s), age(s), and supporting citations and documentations or direct personal testimony. Or this may be a bad idea.

Let me know if you'd like to co-mod.

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It is interesting to note that only 1% of the adverse events are reported.
So 14,000 deaths in Europe means 1,400,000 deaths.

From /s/CoronaVirus The severity of Covid19 are exaggerated, because the PCR tests give 95% to 100% false positives.
So the death-counts can be reduced by a factor 20.

The disease can also be treated well with anti-viral medicine. So all the deaths were actually not necessary.
http://hcqlost.com keeps a counter.
http://c19ivermectin.com shows the success of several anti-viral medicine.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Keep in mind that shills eill say that study of 1% figure is a lie. However, other studies on this have shown between 2-5% so still very low.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

If have some of those very stupid people on my ignore list.

That is why I propose for more censorship, with clear rules that bind posts and replies to logical consistency.
(No logical fallacies allowed, like insults, etc.)

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

clear rules that bind posts and replies to logical consistency.

Excellent idea. Food for thought.

Not sure how this could be achieved without much more user interaction. Most SaidIt folks are simply lazy, while many Wikipedia folks are looking for shit to disturb. I would guess that with enough data it wouldn't matter if you were consistent or not as your profile would speak for itself, whether you were quality or not, consistent or not, or a socks-like shill or not.

But problematically for content with very little interaction things would remain nebulous.

Wikipedia projects require you to fill out forms before you upload media. It can be annoying at times, but at least it assures that the content is reasonably categorized and not copyrighted. I wonder if a more detailed submission page might help or hinder.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No logical fallacies allowed

If only....

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Indeed, shill.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Awww - poor Jason needs a hug, with this

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Awww - poor Jason needs a hug, with this

If it were clever or witty I might at least salute your creativity, but alas, it just sounds like a threat of violence from a shill.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data