COVID-19 "M-RNA vaccines" increases heart risk
(via nonormal.win )
Abstract's title speaks for itself
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
His findings:
556 patients is not a huge sample size but a reasonable amount to get a estimation.
The dataDr. Gundry reports his medical group has conducted the highly predictive PULS biomarker test on 566 patients. The PULS test generates a score predicting the 5-year risk (percentage of chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome, defined as a range of conditions that are associated with sudden, reduced blood flow to the heart most often caused by a plaque rupture or clot formation in the heart’s arteries.
The PULS cardiac test assesses parameters such as inflammation (interleukin-16 or IL-16), cell death (Fas cell apoptosis), HGF (Hepatocyte Growth Factor or HGF that gauges the movement of T-cells—a type of white blood cells generated by the thymus gland). This score is usually assessed every 3-6 months among at-risk patients. This data may explain the observed heart problems following Covid-19 vaccination.
PULS TEST: Increase in cardiac risks with RNA Covid—19 Vaccination
Inflammation (IL-16): rose from 35 to 82
Cell death (apoptosis Fas): rose from 22 to 46
HGF (T-cell movement): rose from 42 to 86
The overall PULS score rose from 11% five-year risk to 25% five-year risk!
Dr. Gundry indicates an ominous change in these PULS scores was first noted with the advent of RNA Covid-19 vaccines. These changes were seen in most vaccinated subjects, his report notes.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/11/bill-sardi/red-alert-renowned-cardiac-surgeon-steven-gundry-warns-rna-covid-19-vaccines-more-than-double/
AHA (American Heart Association) response to the publication on Circulation.
Soon after publication of the above abstract in Circulation, it was brought to the American Heart Association Committee on Scientific Sessions Program’s attention that there are potential errors in the abstract.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001051
Also AHA
The financial ties between large pharmaceutical companies and the AHA are numerous and very remunerative for the AHA, including huge donations from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, Merck and Pfizer. BMS, along with Merck and Pfizer are national sponsors of AHA's Go Red For Women> heart disease awareness campaign whose web site tells patients "If your doctor has placed you on statin therapy to reduce your cholesterol, you can rest easy--the benefits outweigh the risks"
The American Heart Association -- Protecting Industry Not Patients
AHA fighting back anti-bigpharma publication while being heavily funded by bigpharma. Conflict of interest?
[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)