Reddit bans anyone for mentioning their new admin Ashton "Aimee" Challenor's name

submitted by TurtleFuzz from self.WatchRedditDie

Reddit's new employee, Ashton "Aimee" Challenor, apparently has extreme protection on the site. Here is his Wikipedia page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aimee_Challenor

A mod in r/ukpolitics linked a Spectator article that mentioned Challenor's name, in passing, and with no mention of reddit at all. The article was about the Green Party's determination to erase women's rights (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-green-party-s-growing-contempt-for-women-s-rights)

The mod was banned, and the sub went private to do damage control. The sub is back this morning, with a helpful sticky: https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/mbbm2c/welcome_back_subreddit_statement/

Of note are these new rules:

Please do not name this individual, at all. Doing so may result in your account being banned by the admins.

Please do not ask further questions about this, as doing so may result in your account being banned by the admins.

Please do not discuss this incident on Reddit publicly or privately (e.g. on private subreddits and/or in private messages, chat etc.), as doing so may result in your account being banned by the admins.

So you're not allowed to talk about a public figure anymore or you risk your account being banned. Seems pretty extreme, to go to such lengths for a pedophile apologist.

all 130 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]lestratege 60 insightful - 7 fun60 insightful - 6 fun61 insightful - 7 fun -  (5 children)

Clown world to the max.

[–]GConly 59 insightful - 6 fun59 insightful - 5 fun60 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

So you're not allowed to talk about a public figure anymore

~But it's doxxing~

Of a public figure, doing interviews and being promoted by Reddit as their new admin.

What we have is someone personally connected to one proven pedophile rapist and another person who wrote borderline CP (dad and hubby) who isn't distancing themselves from either, in any way.

Which is odd to say the least. Most non pedos are so horrified they ditch pedo rapist family members. If not totally at least publicly. But no, Chanellor actually helped his dad get a job with him.

Which makes you wonder if all three share the same...tastes.

So expecting this to end up with police carrying off his hard drive someday.

And this guy is modding subs for kids.

Edit: Reddit is peaking the hell out over this.

[–]FediNetizen 28 insightful - 4 fun28 insightful - 3 fun29 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Which makes you wonder if all three share the same...tastes.

Not just those three. "Aimee's" story has been well-known for a couple years now. The reddit admins that pushed to get him hired knew what happened when they were making that push. My guess is that if you arrested the reddit staff that advocated for "Aimee" and examined their hard drives, it wouldn't just be "Aimee" that would be going to prison.

[–]GConly 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suspect at least one of the well known TW mods on Reddit has a stash of cp. It gets posted to subs they want shut down to easily.

[–]Skuly 42 insightful - 5 fun42 insightful - 4 fun43 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

Just ban everyone who questions that's so reddit.

[–]Marquis_DePaid 33 insightful - 1 fun33 insightful - 0 fun34 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This practice didn't originate from reddit and it won't be confined to reddit. It's part of a broader trend where leftist authoritarians are attempting to restrict access to impactful and relevant information.

[–]luster 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They aren't trying, they're succeeding. How many people knew about Hunter Biden's history with selling political access before the 2020 election?

[–]RedEyedWarrior 39 insightful - 1 fun39 insightful - 0 fun40 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Read the wiki article about him. This man and is family are a trainwreck. I don’t know how he’s allowed to be involved in politics. Or allowed to move to the United States - scratch that, it doesn’t surprise me now that I think about it when they’ve let Amos Yee in.

Of course Reddit protects this Ashton Knight fella. Reddit admins defend paedophiles all the time. Remember: r/AgainstHateSubreddits routinely posts CP on subreddits that they target. So the mods of AHS possess CP. And have gotten away with it so far.

[–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just looking at him, he's clearly the sort of person only pedophiles would associate. He's like 3x more pedo-looking than Jared Fogle.

[–]VirgilGriff 32 insightful - 5 fun32 insightful - 4 fun33 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

Based on their response I assume it's a man pretending to be a woman and acting like a massive cunt?

[–]Tine 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. I had to do my own research and I kept getting confused why every article was a picture of an obvious man.

[–]VirgilGriff 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

  1. Every article says "she," "her," "woman," "female." When you can see the truth in front of your eyes.

[–]phlux 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dont give a fuck about trans pronoun whining - trans are like almost zero % of the population and they are dominating a lot of media - Fuck them, let them do what they want, but I do need to hear about it.

[–]scrubking 32 insightful - 3 fun32 insightful - 2 fun33 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Not the first pedo Admin and certainly not the last.

[–]lestratege 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The trans community is to the pedos of nowadays what the Church was to the pedos of the 1950s: a safe heaven that allows them to operate and if anyone points a finger, the whole social shaming goes against that person.

Those fuckers used to done a roman collar, now they just put on a whig and pretend they're women, and god forbids if you call on their actions, they'll brand you transphobic.

[–]DivisionISillusion 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Just permanently banned on Reddit for posting a link to information of Ashton/Aimee, her partner and her wicked pedo father. The truth is so twisted. People!! Must wake up to “Why” is Reddit allowing these child predators to be moderators (ghiselle Maxwell) Sick World

[–][deleted] 21 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Don't address these sick men with female pronouns, they are men and should be addressed as such. Calling them she/her is lying and following their nonsensical ideology. If these men sexually assaulted women would you call them women sexually assaulting women and she/her? You don't give this nonsensical ideology an inch, they take the whole mile. This is not reddit, you can speak the truth here.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

This is not reddit, you can speak the truth here

[Deleted]

[–]magnora7 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

deleted usernames means they deleted their own account, if an admin or mod removes something it says 'removed'.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I know, I was being funny. That was odd to praise saidit and delete the account.

[–]magnora7 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Probably a troll trying to make a mockery of saidit for new users like usual

[–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In my book there needs to be a minimum level of effort to present as female. You can't just be a fat ugly man with shoulder length hair and visible stubble and expect to be referred to as a woman. This guy doesn't even look trans aside from long hair. He looks like the archetypical pedophile.

[–]Chipit 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Welcome, friend. You're one of the good guys.

[–]scrubking 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well done. I salute you.

[–]JulienMayfair 19 insightful - 11 fun19 insightful - 10 fun20 insightful - 11 fun -  (3 children)

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain -- or the wig.

[–]jet199 16 insightful - 12 fun16 insightful - 11 fun17 insightful - 12 fun -  (1 child)

Or the chins.

[–]JulienMayfair 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Or the "family business"

[–]PassionateIntensity 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Hey, that's real hair. His best feature. This picture is actually flattering compared to Aimee IRL.

[–]Drewski 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Just to sum up, one of the women/politicians mentioned in the article is a recently hired Reddit admin, who permanently banned anyone posting an article critical of her (even though she is a public figure). Article doesn't mention she is a Reddit admin or anything else concerning Reddit.

She also hired her father, who is a convicted pedophile who kept a young boy chained in his attic sex dungeon, as her agent, after he was arrested. She also married a self-admitted pedophile and later defended him, when his disgusting behavior was discovered.

This is where reddit's "anti-evil" policies lead.

-Kurvo1ovac - deleted post

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/coventry-captive-girl-attic-torture-den-david-challenor-coventry-a8502991.html

[–]jet199 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What that article didn't mention is that David Challenor was dressed as a little girl and made his victim call him by a girl's name during the rape.

He's trans as well by any current definition.

[–]PassionateIntensity 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

~Call me LUCY~. I don't want to make the victim any more identifiable but there was an incest angle too.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

ffs

I think we've all worked out there's an incest angle with Aimee and his brother too.

Likely they only got love as children if they enacted certain behaviour and roles and then they look for love the same way in adulthood as well.

[–]fuckupaddams 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

If people keep calling this fucker "she" I'm going to really commit some female crimes.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just because she has a penis and grew up as a boy is no reason for you to be jealous that people care more about men who identify as women than biological women. /s

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

kept a young boy man chained/tied in his her (attic) sex dungeon

I'd love it if a girl did that to me. But not the sex part.

[–]scrubking 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Stop calling this man Aimee. HIS name is Ashton.

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Aimee is funnier though.

It has that trashy spelling as well.

Like, he's trying to say he's very on target or something.

[–]Doberlady 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trashy special snowflake spelling

[–]jet199 19 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Again, what is it about that great big thumbface which gets people acting like they are protecting a fragile little kitten?

His peado victim (little) acting must be out of this world.

[–]nautilistic 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

When a pedo rapist say he's actually a trans women, all criticism must be silenced and they become a saint, brave, courageous and a shining light to all.

/s obviously

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman 7 insightful - 8 fun7 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

You forgot 'stunning'.

Blocked and reported.

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah but even other trans don't get this.

Rachel McKinnon/Veronica Ivy got sacked recently and it was partly because he was going out with a paedo.

When you hear how people in the Green Party and Lib Dems who worked with him talk about Aimee it's just plain weird.

[–]asterias 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reddit going to extremes to hide the fact that its admins are really filthy individuals. What a surprise! (not)

[–]NutterButterFlutter 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

As expected, Reddit admins have issued a non-committal response about the situation:

Hilariously, subreddits are going private in protest:

[–][deleted] 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Damn if all those subs in that comment went private I'm actually really proud. It'll be interesting to see if people are still getting in trouble for talking about her after the admin response.

[–]fuckupaddams 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What does a sub going private really mean?

[–]GoldenBess 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

wtf is this monstrosity

[–]Questionable 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

You have yet to see what it is.

https://conspiracies.win/p/12i3l9cLq5/a-literal-reddit-admin--enjoy-th/c/

[–]madcow-5 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My god....

I love that top comment though:

Wearing a diaper, a frilly dress and hugging a teddy bear.

This is who is controlling the narrative on reddit.

This is who is calling you an incel, white supremacist or nazi.

This is who votes for Joe Biden.

[–]TheJamesRocket 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I feel dirty just reading that wiki page. What a freak.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The left will push the narration that Challenor is a victim, absolutely private person and "LEAVE HER ALONE!!!111"

[–]AnarchySpeach 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hi! I saw your reddit link of the statement was dead.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210323122740if_/https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/mbbm2c/welcome_back_subreddit_statement/

So here it is on the wayback machine. :)

[–]TurtleFuzz[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oops, thanks!

[–]swordinthestream 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ashton "Aimee" Challenor — ah yes, yet another case study showing how trans people are mentally deranged in more ways than one.

[–]angryturtle 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

Wait, is that wiki bio actually real?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

Surprisingly, yes. She needs PR support. That is the most horribly skewed Wiki record I've seen in a while. (It should be mainly about her, rather than her father, who might be mentioned instead further down-page.) She is being attacked. I know almost nothing about her, but the attack is obviously professional and meant to keep her out of politics, as much as possible.

[–]jet199 25 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You realise Aimee edits that page, right?

If it's all about his father then that's Aimee's obsession, not anyone else's.

[–]Chipit 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Why is the socks account in every thread defending this censoring freak?

And Wikipedia being biased in a non-left direction...laughable.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I noticed 2 accounts: one pretends to be a typical neonazi and one pretends to be a typical libtard. I wonder if they are trolls or clowns.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Not sure you really want an answer, but as you may have seen, the ukpolitics subreddit mods supported her, while censoring and temporarily shutting down the conversation, because of a concern about doxxing &c.

I'm not really defending her, as I don't know much about her. What I'm seeing is a lot of hatred for her that is not based on any serious wrongdoing. She fucked up when she hired her father for something and paid the price. But the continued hatred for her is informative of a broader trend that's not really about her, but about trans people.

The problem with the Wikipedia page about her is that she's not managed to get someone to edit or move the stuff about her father down page. Not sure why that is.

[–]Chipit 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

"hatred"? I thought we called this "consequences".

But the continued hatred for her is informative of a broader trend that's not really about her, but about trans people.

[citation needed]

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

She got her consequences, and moved to a different country.

For the citation, simply read posts about this person and trans people. There are plenty on Saidit and elsewhere.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

She got her consequences

Working for Reddit as a consequence.

Your comments are like not funny jokes.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seems you've not read much about her. Not sure what's funny. And you seem to be obsessed with responding to my posts. Get help.

[–]Chipit 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They should be easy to provide, then.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

THey're provided in my other posts. If you look through my posts you'll see them.

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Uh-huh, sure.

[–]jet199 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"She fucked up when she hired her father for something and paid the price."

At that time he used social media to push the defences claim that the victim had just been playing with sex toys.

It wasn't just a mistake. This guy was gaslighting over child rape to help a rapist escape justice.

Basically because you can only see trans people as poor victims rather than fully formed human beings you can't see a trans person might be bad. This attitude is exactly what draws abusers to taking a trans ID. They know they will always get the benefit of the doubt from biased people like yourself.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're in London, right?

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

hatred

there are some well-paid writers who are helping to remove her from politics

What's the point of your baseless accusations? Do you have any evidence?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's an interpretation of the links and other information discussed in threads at Saidit. One of my comments here: https://saidit.net/s/MeanwhileOnReddit/comments/7m4s/reddit_admins_just_had_a_fucking_moment/sn0v

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

So you don't have any evidence, just running around and insulting people. I got it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I answered your various questions. I provided my interpretations of the information, websites, and threads, all of which contain the evidence you've asked for. Moreover, I doubt you're actually a happy blueberry.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

there are some well-paid writers who are helping to remove her from politics

Who paid them?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really? It's a well-known profession.

[–]fuckupaddams 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

HE. HE. HE. God fucking damn it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

If you "misgender" Aimee, and I get how ridiculous that is, it just gives people ammunition to dismiss you as transphobic. Not that they need a reason to dismiss people as transphobic.

[–]fuckupaddams 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'd rather """Get in trouble""" than have anyone leaving that thread thinking this person is ACTUALLY a WOMAN.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not about getting in trouble, it's about effective communication. You automatically turn some people off your argument by "misgendering" and then side track the conversation.

I call it the gender pretend game btw.

[–]fuckupaddams 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Calling him a she IS misgendering him.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Just say what comes into your head, don't over think it. Don't use up your time working it out.

Some I call he, some I call she.

I don't waste my brain cells on other people's special gender feelz.

Storme Delarverie said “People used to ask me if I preferred being called he or she. I said, ‘Whatever makes you comfortable’.”

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That didn't go over so well for the terfs and lesbians.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

We're still here.

I little name calling never hurt anyone.

It turns out words aren't actual violence and don't literally kill anyone.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're a terf?

Yeah the terfs are here cause they got kicked off reddit. They got silenced. People are getting sick of it but we're not in the clear just yet. Baby steps.

Speaking of babies... I name today's bowel movement Aimee cause it was fat, disgusting, and I can't believe it came from my ass.

[–]tfmm 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just left that cesspool for this very reason. Looking forward to a site that will take a stand against pedos, instead of hire them.

[–]Zednix 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ashton Challenor and his Father AND husband are all pedophiles and animal torturing scum. It's super fucked they hired that retard but its not shocking because Reddit has been sprinting into the abyss for years now.

[–]EUBanana 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Spectator has since found out about all this eDrama, and written an article on it.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-reddit-censoring-the-spectator-

Well done Aimee, I never heard of you before yesterday and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Article follows...

What's going on over at Reddit? The popular chatroom, which bills itself as 'the front page of the internet', has been accused of blocking Spectator articles. Earlier this week, the most popular UK politics page was suspended from public view and users who posted a link to a Spectator article were blocked.

The article in question mentions one Aimee Challenor, a former ‘rising star’ of the Green party and transgender activist, who left the party in disgrace after she appointed her father — a violent paedophile — as her election agent.

According to the moderators on the Reddit group r/UKPolitics, Aimee has since been hired by the tech firm, which is now zealously blocking content about her. One Redditor who posted a Spectator article containing a brief mention of Challenor found themselves mysteriously 'suspended’ from Reddit.

That user was subsequently reinstated after r/UKPolitics raised concerns with the tech company. As the moderators put it, 'It later became apparent that Reddit has hired this individual as a Reddit admin, and were banning people from discussing her past to protect their employee from harassment.' Mr S put the allegations to Reddit — that Challenor is now working at the company and using her position to have unfavourable articles removed. Their spokesperson told me:

“ Earlier this month, a Reddit employee was the target of harassment and doxxing (sharing of personal or confidential information). Reddit activated standard processes to protect the employee from such harassment, including initiating an automated moderation rule to prevent personal information from being shared. The moderation rule was too broad, and our systems suspended a moderator who posted content that was perceived to include personal information. After investigating the situation, we reinstated the moderator the same day. We are continuing to review all the details of the situation to ensure that we protect users and employees from doxxing — including those who may have a public profile — without mistakenly taking action on non-violating content. Was the censorship purely automatic or did Challenor play a role in Reddit's removal of damaging information about her? The article itself, by Julie Bindel, only mentions her in passing. Whatever 'systems' Reddit was using seem to have removed any link to that article and banned any person who posted it. Bear in mind that the information about Challenor wasn't posted on Reddit itself but on The Spectator's own website. Mr S has some doubts over whether it really was the 'system' that was doing the deleting and blocking...

It is worth mentioning too just how disturbing the allegations about Aimee and her father are. Back in 2018, she quit the Greens after it emerged she had hired her father, David Challenor, as her election agent despite the fact he been charged with 22 sexual offences. These charges included the rape and torture of a 10-year-old girl, something Aimee neglected to tell the party. The details of that abuse are horrific; they include the child being suspended from the attic rafters as Aimee's father — dressed in a nappy — carried out his sadistic sexual crimes.

He was jailed for 22 years after being found guilty of 20 of those 22 offences. Aimee subsequently quit the party and accused the Greens of transphobia against her. At the time she said:

“ I cannot be held responsible for the actions of my father. I am not to blame for his behaviour. Yes, he was my election agent. This was one of a number of ways I was seeking to reconcile my relationship with my father after coming out of care. On reflection, I can understand that it was unacceptable for me to appoint my dad as my election agent when he had been arrested. She then briefly joined the Coventry Liberal Democrats — and was promptly suspended by Lib Dem head office after yet another paedophile scandal. A social media account belonging to her partner, Nathaniel Knight, admitted to having written 'smut featuring minors’, among other sordid horrors. The unfortunate Aimee condemned the messages, saying her partner’s account had been hacked and announcing she was quitting politics.

Mr S has attempted to get in contact with Aimee but to no avail. In the meantime, anyone looking to know more about her past behaviour can read this piece by Melanie McDonagh — or you can read the offending Julie Bindel article here...

[–]CastleHoward 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was obvious from day 1 for me that TERF was another name for protectors of children. If you can infiltrate the schools, online forums, therapists office you can take the children. Mothers are strongest enemy of paedophiles. The UK Mumsnet is the source of activists.

[–]Questionable 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

https://conspiracies.win/p/12i3l9cLq5/a-literal-reddit-admin--enjoy-th/c/

[–]xkingxkaosx 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

first few minutes of seeing reddit this morning, I was like "it is time for a better alternative".

Reddit is too easily build on data farming and opinion steering, instead of sharing information that is free. I am glad i joined here, hopefully SaidIt is much better.

[–]fuckupaddams 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This is my inbox after I point out that these are the actions of a man, not a woman, and that it's unfair and dishonest to not mention the fact that this person is male: "She, her, this woman is evil!" etc.

If you don't want to read it all, at least check out what I highlighted in red.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The resolution makes it hard to read that.

[–]fuckupaddams 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I edited it, is it any better now?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah I can read it now. That's funny. I got similar but milder comments. I did actually make a similar point just now on Saidit (oh wait, that was to you), that it's important to still play the gender pretend game for now because otherwise it detracts from the overall goal.

You see all those people with the doublethink looking at men and actually seeing women, you lose them if you don't play the game and some of them are beyond hope but I believe many of them just had bad influences, a wayward flock.

[–]fuckupaddams 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Haha yep, you made that point to me. I respectfully will agree to disagree. Glad you could read my post now

[–]fuckupaddams 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, dunno how to fix it

[–]MyLongestJourney 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Reddit finally fired Challenor.Now they have to explain why they failed to do a proper background check .

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think they did run a proper background check...

[–]MyLongestJourney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am close to believing they did and they are basically a group of psychopathic nonces.

[–]filbs111 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder to what extent Reddit might be reducing their liability for an unfair dismissal lawsuit.

[–]dissidentrhetoric 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

reddit has been slowing declining over time. At least we have saidit now.

[–]youvebeenliedto 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What are the two upvote options stand for? EDIT: Insightful and fun. Got it lol

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Paywalled article, but not listing women as some endangered group is perfectly fine by me.

[–]fuckupaddams 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Huh, rape and slavery being non-issues is new to me.

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Surely, women taking a second seat to transwomen is not new to you.

[–]SaidOverRed 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Clown world will only deepen. I just saw a leftist ad telling children to report parents wary of homosexuals teaching gay sex to kids in school. Because stopping their grooming is bigotry now, apparently.

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

More men than women are raped, but it's funny because male victims are in jail, so that's hilarious right?

As for slavery, I don't recall many pics of female slaves picking the cotton or doing heavy labor?

Perhaps you're one of those who mistakes women selling pussy (dealers) as 'oppressed' and the marks being taken advantage (addicts) of as the 'oppressors'? I'm guessing you're one of those shitwits that thinks when a man is forced to pay allthemoney to a woman that broke her side of the marriage contract, that this is "oppression of women" huh? Or even "slavery"?

Nah, women are just people, nothing special, and not deserving of some special rare unicorn protected status.

[–]fuckupaddams 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You are entirely full of shit. More men are raped than women my little shiny asshole.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you even bother to jewgle?

"That’s 216,000 victims, not instances. These victims are often assaulted multiple times over the course of the year. The Justice Department now seems to be saying that prison rape accounted for the majority of all rapes committed in the US in 2008, likely making the United States the first country in the history of the world to count more rapes for men than for women." https://nplusonemag.com/issue-13/politics/raise-the-crime-rate/

But it's funny, right? Cos they're in jail and fucked up the ass by other men, so it's funny? hehehe? Ha ha?

Cunt.

[–]lestratege 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At the Green party spring conference this weekend, a motion which sought to introduce a party policy on women’s sex-based rights was defeated. A whopping 289 delegates (out of 521) voted to not include biological females in the party’s list of oppressed groups.

All the motion aimed to do was simply add a paragraph to the Green party’s ‘Our Rights and Responsibilities Policy’. The motion reads:

“‘This is to include the protected characteristic of sex as currently our Record of Policy statements supports the other eight characteristics (age, disability, gender reassignment, sexual orientation, race, maternity, religion/belief, marriage/civil partnership) but not that of sex discrimination – aimed primarily at women…’

The motion was opposed because, in essence, it is considered ‘transphobic’ to recognise that women are targeted by male oppression precisely because of their female sex.

The Green party leader Sian Berry, who has declared that she wishes London to be the most ‘trans inclusive’ city in the world, seemed to see this as a victory. In a series of tweets following the vote, Berry stated: ‘Motion E01 was defeated. My party voted for inclusive women’s rights and someone is having a big old cry. Thank you Greens!’ Berry signed off with, ‘Vote for inclusion and kindness!’

But by voting against the motion, the Green party has effectively contradicted the 2010 Equalities Act, which includes sex as a protected characteristic. In their rush to be ‘inclusive’ the Greens have ended up excluding 51 per cent of the population.

Other anti-women motions passed at the conference include the support for self-identification, which would enable trans people to declare themselves as the opposite sex without the need for any medical intervention, and for trans parents to be recognised on their child’s birth certificate as father, mother or parent, such as in the case of Freddy McConnell, a trans man who wishes to be the legal ‘father’ of the baby he gave birth to.

The Green’s record on women’s rights is a disgraceful one. In 2019 its Regional Council (GPRC) announced the appointment of the two new co-chairs, describing them as ‘Self identifying Non-Male Co-Chair: (female)’ and ‘Self identifying Non-Female Co-Chair: (male)’.

The party explained that, ‘to specify that the chairs must be a “man” and a “woman” would exclude people who have non-binary or other identities, and we want the roles to be open to everyone.’ I asked if, to ensure that lesbians were not excluded, they would also advertise for ‘non-male non-heterosexuals’ but did not receive a response.

The Green party leadership has long capitulated to the trans Taliban. Take Caroline Lucas, the former Greens leader. Prior to 2016 Lucas steadfastly supported the feminist campaign to criminalise paying for sex as a way to deter men from creating the demand for prostitution. She told me back in 2008 that she wanted to see an end to the sex trade because she understood it to be exploitative of women and a barrier to equality. But in 2016, having been told off by trans activist Paris Lees (who is of the view that feminists that campaign to end prostitution are posh, white prudes) Lucas did an about turn, offered to meet up with Lees, and has since supported the campaign to decriminalise pimps, brothel owners and punters.

I spoke to a serving member of the Green party executive (who asked not to be named) minutes after EO1 was defeated. She tells me that, ‘Women are set to leave the Green Party in droves. For a significant number, this is the final straw.’

‘The planet is burning,’ another senior party member tells me, ‘but you would think they would pay more attention to that than bloody pronouns.’

Another senior official thanked me for covering the story but told me that even ‘liking a tweet by you would get me excommunicated’.

The Green party is destroying itself in an effort to capitulate to bullies. The likes of Sian Berry refuse to recognise that extreme transgender ideology is simply misogyny thinly disguised as progressive politics. Last year, Scottish Green MSP Andy Wightman resigned from the party following threats to expel him after he had the nerve to attend a public meeting on women’s rights at which I spoke. Wightman accused the party of being ‘very censorious of any deviation from an agreed line.’

[–]slushpilot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is very relevant again:

https://twitter.com/lacroicsz/status/1288947357393059840

[–]blowininthewind 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

link to hackernews discussion about the sub: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26568960#26569556

we should really create a decentralized forum.

[–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Funny, I was using reddit the last few days, thinking I got around the super ban status, and while I was there I heard nothing about this until this morning.

[–]superstr8 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Many subs are also going private...does that even solve anything??

[–]TurtleFuzz[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It was my understanding that the subs are going private as a boycott. If you visit one of the private subs, you get redirected to a page that explains it: https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/mbcls0/ongoing_drama_update_rukpolitics_mod_team_release/

[–]superstr8 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what does making the subs go private do to hurt reddit? Does it make their stock plummet? Ads? Just curious because I don't get the angle. Would it make a bigger impact if they all left somewhere else?

[–]TurtleFuzz[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it's the advertising angle. People can't see ads of they can't see reddit.

I do think it would be a bigger impact if they left reddit, but there aren't ton of safe alternatives.

I hope something comes of this protest. First they censored and deleted SuperStraight, and now 2 weeks later they defend a pedophile apologist on their payroll. Doesn't look good.

[–]superstr8 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://SSLGBS.com lists alternatives and just opened up a community space to make groups and pages. If you click on the community link you'll see them all.

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

reminded me of kim.

[–]Cuteshooter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A doc about it made it to r/documentaries