First off:
It is likely Maxwell had at least one reddit account considered she was a social butterfly who knew the reddit CEO Pao, as shown by their (albeit limited/brief) interaction at a private party. Pao would not have been invited if Epstein and friends thought reddit was silly.
Given her social status, she also likely would have ended up in a position of influence on the site, and would quite possibly be networked with some other redditors aware of her identity.
Anyone involved with intelligence is aware of how "opsec" works. Put out a few token statements claiming to be someone else. Her interview where she claims to be a man in his 40's is contradicted by some mod chats. Public and media-given self-descriptions from a profile aren't useful evidence. The writing style and behavior are much more relevant.
Here's evidence I see:
1- MaxwellHill uses quite a bit of UK-influenced language, something congruent with the real life Maxwell. Her bizarre and intense knowledge of age of consent laws in various states is something that would be relevant to Jeffrey Epstein (this was one of his early legal defenses before he was arrested the first time).
2- MaxwellHill stopped posting entirely (in public) after the arrest, as well as at other suspicious times, screencaps of posts with links here:
https://imgur.com/a/aCIBtLN
3- The relationship with Huffingtonpost. Huffpost is a known neoliberal shill group with ties to UK/Israeli intelligence, and pushes Russiagate shit on their behalf. MaxwellHill was also an extreme Russiagater, one who even published on Huffpost before, something pretty rare for the population at large and noteworthy
4- The claim to be a man seems like clear opsec. That was a claim often pushed by the media portrayals (let's remember that gendering someone without asking, or without getting details is considered rude, so calling her a man without providing a general background of her profile is strange), yet according to modlog leaks other mods speak as if she's a woman, because her account was controversial well before being identified:
A single Reddit user is influencing the news consumed by 22 million people(self.conspiracy)
..."The leaked chats implied they are a female reddit admin."
Second off:
The lack of anyone providing counter-evidence is noteworthy. Freaks go on reddit all the time, a serial killer Brendt Christensen had an account "bacbac".
...The prosecution moves on to Christensen’s Reddit account. He says Christensen’s account name was “bacbac”. The witness is asked if he prepared a summary of Christensen’s Reddit account. He says yes.
Yet I'm seeing mentally retarded people trying to hush this all up without even the laziest attempt at adding evidence of user activity. People will claim she's been active in modding, with no screenshots.
Earlier critiques of her account brought in screenshots of modding, why can't her defenders?
http://archive.vn/AYB5X
Meet the Reddit power user who helped bring down r/technology
Maxwellhill, one of Reddit’s first and most important users, has now become the site’s own worst enemy.
Modlog screenshot at bottom: https://imgur.com/a/aCIBtLN
That would be all it takes to shut up a lot of the critics, yet the retarded defenders won't post that for some reason
Conclusion
When I first started writing this, I was 50/50 on the identity of this reddit user, and I was restraining myself from jumping to conclusions. Now that I've finished, it seems overwhelmingly likely that this reddit user was Maxwell.
I didn't care enough to look into this thread until I saw people reposting it met with extremely low-value criticism.
"High value criticism" doesn't necessarily make someone correct with their view, there are cases of "high value criticism" that I still disagree with, like much of Michael Tracey's input on the Tara Reade case for example. The complete absence of any high value criticism in a case is usually a red flag for me. I recall the complete lack of high value criticism as teh Syrian chlorine gas attack came out, and various shills flooded early threads about it pushing stupid shit about how "Assad would clearly want to teach the rebels a lesson", and what not. Then when the leaks came out, the conversation shifted to mocking and other discredit attempts.
This pattern showed up in a stupidpol thread I came across here: http://archive.is/enc33
there doesn't seem to be anything here