Continued from Part III.
Dr. Urso: I want to ask Dr. Malone that question. I've worked with lipid nanoparticles for chemotherapy, they're like garlic, they go everywhere, they can slip through a door crack, they go through very tight junctions. I knew as soon as I saw the technology it was going to end up in the brain because that's one of the things they were doing, that was the original design, for lipid nanoparticles to be used in chemotherapy in order to direct chemo to the brain. The problem is that lipid nanoparticles went into ovaries, bone marrow, adrenal glands and other tissues so it's still being worked on, studies are being done I but wanted to ask Dr. Malone whether, knowing it's going to all these places, he has concerns about children being vaccinated.
.
Dr. Malone: Yes. Did a 4-minute video on the risks to brain, heart, coagulopathy, reproductive systems and immune systems.That resulted in a direct attack from the Israeli Minister of Health on my reputation, multiple fact-checkers denying it, but the data are incontrovertible. To your point - and I do have some credibility since I did invent this technology - so I do know about the "untranslated regions" and why they're there. I understand in detail about reverse transcriptase (4:36:02) and what it can do. I can tell you that we moved off of trying to develop further these mRNA and DNA complexes based on our work in non-human primates and in mice, we spent years but could never overcome the hyperinflammatory characteristics of these polynucleotide cationic (not sure this is the word he used) lipid complexes. The Cariko and Wiseman assertion - I brought Kitty Cariko into this like a decade or more after I'd made the basic discoveries - they assert that the inclusion of the pseudouridine reduces the inflammatory response but it's a marginal decrease. Their competitor in Germany has shown very good response without the pseudouridine. So Dr. Wiseman is right, pseudourodine is a synthetic compound, it's there to reduce the inflammatory response but the inflammatory response is still there.
.
To Dr. Urso's point - we're clearly seeing not only specific effects associated with spike protein but non-specific effects associated with lipid nanoparticles. How do we know that? (4:37:44) Because Moderna gave a presentation to their stockholders recently where they rolled out their Phase I data on their influenza vaccine candidates using the same technology platform so no spike proteins, associated influenza antigens and in their hands at the 100 mcg dose, which is the dose used in the EUA vaccines, 90% of subjects had adverse events compared to 30% in placebo group. Not public, just presented to their stockholders, but clearly shows that the cationic lipid RNA complexes have intrinsic toxicity above and beyond that associated with the spike. Is it the spike, is it the lipid? It's both.
.
(4:38:46) Regarding the data package from Japan - this is the thing that worries me most - that limited data that was not produced to any quality standard that any precursor non-clinical data package I've ever seen would be allowed to be used. What the FDA and regulatory authorities all over the world allowed was for Pfizer to collect data involving unrelated RNAs, other candidates, amalgamate it together and submit it as a package. And in those data, which are not according to good laboratory practices, they did demonstrate that these lipid nanoparticles go all over the body as Dr. Urso said, and oddly, they seem to differentially go to ovaries and the bone marrow, but ovaries relative to testes. Need to be clear, they never measured spike protein, they measured the synthetic lipids and they go to ovaries. (4:40:12) Who cares? Well, a female is born with all the eggs she'll ever have in her ovaries. We know and the CDC finally acknowledges after women all over the world have complained about their altered menses (which was attributed to "hysteria"). Hormonally, the ovaries drive menstruation. We're seeing post-menopausal women starting to bleed, which tells you something is going on in the ovaries and we know these lipids are going to the ovaries. We know that these are synthetic, abnormal fats that insert into membranes and change the charge of cell surfaces (4:41:29). That's all true. So all we have is this trail of bread crumbs.
.
Apparently the FDA made a determination that they would treat these products using their standard checklist approach for a standard vaccine, instead of the checklist that they would use for gene therapy. They made no special accommodation for the novel nature of this technology. So the FDA moved forward with a data package that is grossly inadequate, that doesn't meet any standards, or the norms in my industry that I've been trained on, and that is overlooking known problems. And then when women are complaining about these reproductive effects, they're being accused of hysteria. I'm not too worried about the untranslated region but it should have been investigated.
.
The FDA has been grossly derelict in not following through on these things. Beyond that we have clear indications of reproductive toxicity so I'm concerned about kids and the effect on brain, heart, blood coagulation, reproductive system, immunologic system - and furthermore, they're not at risk for this virus so why are we doing this?
Senator Johnson: Introduces Nicole Serotek.
Nicole Serotek: I've been an RN for over a decade, specialty is critical care, trauma flight nurse. Since beginning of Covid I've been rebranded as an expert in early intervention strategies executed on a massive scale using FLCCC protocols as well as Covid ventilator protective strategies. In May 2020 I was one of nurses that went to NYC because they needed nurses and they needed ventilators and I was the whole package. When I arrived there, the gross negligence and medical malfeasance and complete medical mismanagement of these patients has led us to where we are now.
.
The pandemic response and handicapping of medical professionals trying to provide early treatment. Some examples that give an idea: in NY and what's happening today is that many of the patients are not dying from Covid. I'm also a Master's prepared biochemist, have worked extensively with HIV virus tracking genetic mutations so I feel comfortable going toe to toe with some of these doctors even though I'm not one. On the frontlines, when we asked for ibuprofen?, told no, it was contraindicated. When we asked why we weren't giving them steroids, they said "we're just following orders." I didn't see any patients die of Covid, I've seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance.
.
From my time in NY, I'm known as the nurse in the break room sobbing that they're murdering my patients. The pharma companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice, I guess you could say. On the minorities, the disadvantaged, on the marginalized populations who had no advocates. Pharma companies rolling out Remdesivir onto the patients, I tried to get hold of the IRBs and my chain of command, CMS, Department of Health. They gave Remdesivir to a large number of patients and we all saw it was killing them. It's now FDA approved and continuing to kill patients. Doctors do quantitative data, nurses do qualitative data from a humanistic, phenomelogical approach. We've collected this data to help patients, I formed the organization American Frontline Nurses and Advocacy Network so nurses could advocate for these patients. As these patients get Remdesivir, they have a less than 25% chance of survival if they get more than 2 doses. Now they're rolling it out on children and in skilled nursing homes as early intervention when as Dr. Kory and Dr. Marik have shown, there are cost-effective medications out there.
.
The doctors have covered the vaccines but I can tell you that 2 days ago, I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack. And I had to fight the ER doctor who said 10-year-olds don't have heart attacks, had to argue with him 30 minutes to get him to order an EKG, which showed the child had almost a complete stemi - ST elevated myocardial infarction. He had been vaccinated the day before. People are getting hold of me and the nurse advocates because there's victim shaming, it's anxiety, it's this or that. If they put down it's a vaccine injury, the doctor, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic won't get reimbursed so it gets labeled as anxiety.
.
I've traveled to South America and Africa, working in hot zones to stop the spread of the virus, and working with early intervention. Nowhere in those developing countries do I see the issues that we see in the US. Our level of health care has been deteriorated to substandard, 3rd-world nation health care. People better off in field hospitals in South America than in Level 1 trauma designer hospitals in the US.
.
We're getting reports from nurses across the country about patients not getting food, water, how come a patient hasn't been fed in 9 days? Why do we need to get a court order to force a hospital to feed a patient who is not intubated and is clearly telling you they would like food? "Oh you can't take your bipap? mask off" - that's what nurses could help them do but we're not allowed to.
.
If they're on a ventilator they're not getting basic standards of care. Patients that haven't been bathed or fed, haven't been given water, haven't been turned. This isn't a hospital, it's a concentration camp. Nowhere in the US do we isolate people for 100 hours at a time with no human contact, it's not even allowed in the prisons because it's horrible for their mental health and is considered inhumane. People isolated from their families for days and you have to say goodbye to them over the phone, etc. as others have testified. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to the last rites to their family member. Thanked Sen. Johnson for letting us come, nurses are not often thought of as leading professionals although we're the missing link between doctors and patients.
.
Senator Johnson closing remarks.
there doesn't seem to be anything here