(The following post was created on July 14, 2018. Due to Reddit's excessive filters going back in time, the post has been censored while the information remains pertinent to this day. The links have been archived so more people can see how people feel about the information while the links will be changed as seen fit)

Unfiltered post - Saidit

Original Post

Affected posts - 400 years of mess

---

A recent post has been found to be very fraudulent in regards to the Russia narrative and needs some explanation and context to show how the DNC and intelligence agencies used information to spread as propaganda. The names of the accused are dashed from the record and by all means, no harassment is condoned by the author of this post.

"Russia if you are listening" was the signal roger stone told him to use when trump okayed the hacks of 300 DNC members and accepted the quid pro quo offer to lift sanctions if elected.

This is wrong. Roger Stone has claimed he had a back channel to Russia and that was Randy Credico through Julian Assange, which has been denied both by Wikileaks as well as Randy Credico on the Jimmy Dore Show.

Source 1

Source 2

The 300 members of the DNC were hacked by the Awan brothers, not Wikileaks or Russia:

Awan Brothers 1 Awan Brothers 1

Awan Brothers 2

The ones with access were the Awan brothers. Russia, as of now, does not have the internet speeds to hack anything but locally. Ray McGovern explains:

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity — including two “alumni” who were former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that Julian Assange did not acquire what he called the “emails related to Hillary Clinton” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President Barack Obama.

On January 18, 2017 President Obama admitted that the “conclusions” of U.S. intelligence regarding how the alleged Russian hacking got to WikiLeaks were “inconclusive.” Even the vapid FBI/CIA/NSA “Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections” of January 6, 2017, which tried to blame Russian President Vladimir Putin for election interference, contained no direct evidence of Russian involvement. That did not prevent the “handpicked” authors of that poor excuse for intelligence analysis from expressing “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the Democratic National Committee … to WikiLeaks.” Handpicked analysts, of course, say what they are handpicked to say.

Trump had advanced knowledge and collaborated the release of the hacked dnc emails for the best impact and control of the "news cycle".

This is a lie. The Intelligence Agencies had advanced knowledge of leaks and worked to go after Trump such as Peter Strzok who hoisted himself on his own re-ta-rd:

He showed zero regret for the predicament he put himself into, except for regret at his royal screw-up in thinking he and Lisa could “talk about Hillary” (see below) on their FBI cellphones and no one would ever know. One wag has suggested that Strzok may have been surreptitiously texting, when he should have been listening to the briefing on “Cellphone Security 101.”

The FBI, it's established was anti-Trump. They thought that Clinton was a sure fire win:

It is always necessary at this point to note that the heads of the FBI, CIA, NSA and even the Department of Justice were operating, as former FBI Director James Comey later put it, in an environment “where Hillary Clinton was going to beat Donald Trump.” Most of them expected to be able to stay in their key positions and were confident they would receive plaudits — not indictments — for the liberties that they, the most senior U.S. law enforcement officials, took with the law. In other words, once the reality that Mrs. Clinton was seen by virtually everyone to be a shoo-in is taken into account, the mind boggles a lot less.

So any investigation of Clinton was put on the back burner from Comey, McCabe, and field agents that didn't want to take down their boss.

Comey lied about the standard to prosecute Clinton. A year before, Bryan Nishimura was prosecuted for the exact same crime. Andrew McCabe changed the language. Before that, his wife took money from the Clinton's ally in her election bid in 2015:

McCabe's wife had reportedly received hundreds of thousands of dollars in political contributions from Clinton ally and then-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe for a 2015 run for the state legislature.

So the FBI was rife with people supporting team Clinton for president. Corruption abounded. Hell, the FBI planted a mole in Trump's campaign

This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly “unmasked” Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance warrant against Carter Page, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that its supporting information came from the Hillary Clinton campaign. Now we find it may have also been rolling out human intelligence, John Le Carré style, to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

Which would lead to another big question for the FBI: When? The bureau has been doggedly sticking with its story that a tip in July 2016 about the drunken ramblings of George Papadopoulos launched its counterintelligence probe. Still, the players in this affair—the FBI, former Director Jim Comey, the Steele dossier authors—have been suspiciously vague on the key moments leading up to that launch date. When precisely was the Steele dossier delivered to the FBI? When precisely did the Papadopoulos information come in?

And to the point, when precisely was this human source operating? Because if it was prior to that infamous Papadopoulos tip, then the FBI isn’t being straight. It would mean the bureau was spying on the Trump campaign prior to that moment. And that in turn would mean that the FBI had been spurred to act on the basis of something other than a junior campaign aide’s loose lips.

So the FBI isn't being straight with anyone. Now make no mistake, I don't like Nixon 7.0 but the intelligence agencies I like even less.

All of this is over the fact that Hillary Clinton lost to a game show host. So every way she could get revenge, she did. What is true, according to the Podesta emails, is that they've concocted this plan against Trump since 2015:

That's good, sooner it's clarified the better, and the stronger the better. Re the Trump ISIS video, if we don't have the proof campaign should assign 100 people to look for it ASAP, there is probably something on tape somewhere.

...

Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria. Brent

Here's the video of Trump talking Putin for context

For more context Sperry gets it right

Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative that Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

And we haven't gotten how she stole the election from Bernie Sanders so I'll digress on that.

A candidate congressman, Roger Stone, is also currently under sealed indictment based on Rosensteins report due to actively working with a foreign entity to subvert a US election.

Roger Stone is lying to sell books. That's the logical conclusion you can come to if you listened to the Jimmy Dore stuff above.

Why so public? roger stone knew he was being watched by that point and there was no back channel until... Sally Sold Seychelles.

Wrong. The merchant of death from Blackwater is in a collusion with Saudi Arabia and Israel against Iran which no one's covering except Jeremy Scahill.

Oh and the emails were Russia intelligence not hackers, not china, not a 400lb guy.

While memeing is nice, no one has yet to find good evidence of Russia being able to hack the DNC when the hack was leaked locally. Assange would know, and he can confirm that Russia didn't do it. Because of this, the FBI killed the Wikileaks deal that would have let Assange walk out of the embassy a lot sooner without being Gitmo'd.

What keeps coming up is the corruption of the FBI to protect Hillary Clinton. This should be what people begin to notice.

Finally, download speeds. How did Russia get access to the servers? According to VIPS or Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, the hack was actually a local leak.

Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

Julian Assange is a compromised Russian asset.

Wrong. He's a journalist that has been targeted by the Intelligence Agencies that hate their lies being exposed.

Trump will be Impeached.

Not on these grounds. Mueller already said so. Further, his case against 13 Russian trolls is falling apart.

It's unlikely that the individuals charged in the case will ever appear in U.S. court. The companies were also largely expected to ignore the proceedings.

Folks, always remember that context and critical thinking are important. If you believe the FBI who has lied to you about everything here, you really need to wonder about the lies of the other intelligence agencies and people (Mueller lied about WMDs as FBI director ) you really should assess who you believe.