all 22 comments

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They look like Fox Newswhores.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll wager Trump picked his legal team by asking for headshots and picking these 2.

And he's not wrong. He is the reality TV star, who got to be president by manipulating the media and Americans' sense of outrage.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Next step: Georgia Indicts Millions Of Voters For Conspiring To Elect Trump

 

When asked how they managed to track down every Trump voter in the state, officials said it only required them to hack into the electronic voting machines to access voter data and create a list of who everyone in the state voted for.

"Being able to hack into these machines and manipulate data is an important part of keeping our elections free and fair," Willis explained.

[–]mjsmemee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

hmmm, so they can manipulate data, hmmmm

[–]unagisongsBurn down Reddit! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All they need is one felony and Trumps done. They are throwing everything they can and hoping something sticks. At the very least they can bankrupt Trump by draining his bank accounts. We are post-republic US at this point. The long con and the facade have given way to the reality that we are living in an inverted totalitarian state driven by the whims of the oligarchy.

[–]ageingrockstar 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My understanding is that the facade has been in place since 1789, when the first republic was overthrown in a counter-revolution.

The Plan for the Overthrow. When the conspirators in Philadelphia adjourned in September, 1787, a complete plan for a new government to overthrow the First Republic came out of the secret session, and was presented to the public. It was not a plan for open dictatorship or monarchy, but compromised by having a form of government which was externally democratic and similar in general appearance to some of the state governments, yet enough power was centralized at a single point to enable one person to take over complete control whenever desired. Even so, three members of the secret session actually refused to sign the document, apparently on the grounds that too much concession to democracy had been made.

The "Federal Constitution," as it was called (in contrast to the existing constitution, known as the "Articles of Confederation") bristled with declarations of authority and bans and prohibitions at every point, especially where the States or Congress were concerned. The Congress of the proposed new government was hamstrung by being divided against itself, in order to make it easy to deadlock whenever the proposed two Houses should disagree on anything. A central executive authority was created, in the hands of a single person, called "President of the United States," after the title of the nominal head of the First Republic; but the difference was that while, in the First Republic, the President was merely a presiding officer with no personal power, under the proposed new system the President, contrary to the implication of the title, would do no presiding but could veto any actions of Congress, had complete control of the army and navy and held the purse-strings of the treasury. While under the First Republic the members of Congress were paid by the States that sent them, thus keeping them representatives of their constituency, under the proposed government to overthrow the First Republic, Congressmen would be paid by the Federal treasury (which was to be controlled by the President) and were not subject to recall during their terms, so that, once elected, they would for their entire terms be dependent on the President rather than on their constituents. One of the two Houses of the new Congress (called the Senate because, in line with the Cincinnati idea of gradual introduction of dictatorship on the lines of the ancient Roman Empire, Roman names were supposed to be in order) was arranged so that it would never change completely at any time, but one-third of the members would go out of office every two years, so that the majority would always be composed of members who were not dependent on the latest elections and whom the executive head (who was in closer contact with them than with the other House, according to the plan) could have reduced more to his will, especially through continued control of the purse-strings. In addition, the President, with an almost complete veto power over Congress, and with the duty of giving them an annual program of recommendations as to what would be expected of them in the way of legislation, would, it was expected by those who drew up this plan, be in a position to force any sort of legislation he wanted, in spite of the mandates of the States or the individual opinions of the members of Congress.

https://www.sidis.net/TSChap27.htm

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What a bizarre approach to telling the story of what's going on, wonder what that's all about.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I was just having some fun, it's a normal article aside from like two lines. Well, and the gratuitous pics 😄

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, I know but like you said "gratuitous pics" that took up much of the page. I didn't read the comments to see how the regulars responded to what was apparently intended to be serious and snark combined.

[–]therazorx👹🧹🥇 The road to truth is often messy. 👹📜🕵️🎖️ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Very first line too;

Donald Trump's attorney and total smokeshow Alina Habba says that the case should have been brought in federal court, and was instead brought in state court "by design."

Then later on

Trump attorney Lindsey Halligan told the outlet ... hang on, here's a picture of her too:

[–]3andfro 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

The goal of this flurry of get-Trump court action, expressed in an op-ed on The Hill: https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4155537-the-constitution-bars-trump-from-holding-public-office-ever-again/

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Last week, law professors William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — both members of the conservative Federalist Society — argued in a law review article that Trump is already constitutionally forbidden from serving in public office because of Section Three of the 14th Amendment.

This section, also known as the Disqualification Clause, bars from office any government officer who takes an oath to defend the Constitution and then engages in or aids an insurrection against the United States.

I'm sure it will shock these legal experts to learn that they have to actually prove Trump meets this standard.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Hmm, they got away with it once, flying under the radar. But that guy's crowing over an 8-figure superpac smashing a county commissioner 😄

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

The Democrats' audacious lawfare against Trump smacks of the same single-minded, ideological blindness that keeps the neocons doubling down on failure after failure. At some point it's going to reach critical mass so explosive that even the sycophantic MSM can't hide it.

[–]3andfro 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

They can't foresee a time when the precedents they're so busy establishing could be used against a Democrat. Just another instance of their inability to see how their decisions might play out more than a couple of moves down the board, regardless of how often they're smacked by the Law of Unintended Consequences.

[–]therazorx👹🧹🥇 The road to truth is often messy. 👹📜🕵️🎖️ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean, they pushed how much bullshit for Obama that later got used and abused by Trump? Clinton to Bush?

They don't care, because they won't personally be affected with their one big club (duopoly), their donors win regardless.

[–]3andfro 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

some truth there

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wonder how much of this is due to the delusional belief they can secure permanent ruling class status.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's been their goal forever. Remember Judis and Teixeira's The Emerging Democratic Majority? There's always been a very millenarianistic and antidemocratic strain in Enlightenment liberalism that seeks ultimate justification and a kind of apotheosis through politics: an end to debate, an end to having to grub for votes among the commoners, a final closing of the gates of ijtihad.

Their rejection of religion doesn't mean they've lost the religious impulse; they've just displaced it. As Sartre said, no amount of time can make a difference once you've lost eternity; that's why they're always desperately seeking a facsimile of the permanence they no longer believe in.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good explanation. Guess they assumed too much and celebrated too soon - "the best-laid schemes of mice and men" and all that. The religion aspect certainly rings true, the cultish hivemind that's so often on display.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've seen this one Biden voter linked on RCP a lot.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's an excellent post.