Note: Thinking in Process
Area |
Indirect Change |
Direct Change |
e.g. |
General Strike, RCV, M4All, UBI, JG / Minimum Wage |
Co-ops4all, Currenseas, Community Walls |
Key Criteria for Change ie Change effected through |
New Legislation - May Require New Election |
Mindset Change->the 99% |
Present usurpation problem addressed? |
No |
Yes |
Future usurpation risk |
Unchanged |
Minimized |
Time to result |
Election cycles |
Mind Shift Avalanche |
Other considerations |
The Usurpers @ "the 1%" |
Mind Gatekeepers in Social Media |
BUT don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!
- leverage the political platform & pivot everyone
- see below from here:
Rather than
"Politician X - WEF or not?"
WE should ask
"Politician X, which are you for: eliteDom or usurper-freeDom?"
Doing so would:
1) Allow politicians to further elaborate on their respective existing position:
e.g. Pierre Poilievre would likely say he is not pro-WEF, but how exactly is he pro-freedom?
2) Provide an opportunity for politicians to score easy points with their voters / constituencies (IF they are so inclined to grab the opportunity) and at the same time put them on record.
3) Force all politicians to be on the same page with voters, for them to compete on the terms that voters, or more specifically the 99%, would stand to gain, that would cost practically nothing - requiring only political will; the People, unshackled under the new Paradigm, will do the rest.
4) Leverage the political platform to broadcast the idea of usurper-freeDom to the entire populace - shifting the Overton Window
5) Once enough people have heard of it, it would not take much effort to effect the Mind shift avalanche as people will quickly realize that Usurper-free Dom is more than doable with just Direct Change, no politicians necessary, to bury eliteDom and the Pyramidian🔺Paradigm that undergirds it.
there doesn't seem to be anything here