all 6 comments

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Dude, shittypedia don't deserve you. You are casting pearls before swine. Tsk-tsk.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yet they are widely used by the masses - the ones we need to reach.

It's also good for non-political information. For example, I just added some stuff on Wyverns.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Yes, it's used by the masses, but anything that doesn't conform to their narrative gets edited, no?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Correct. Anything remotely political is controlled to follow the "official" narrative.

[–]Robin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed.

Interesting news in the header. I'd never heard of Peter. I thought it had already been passed on to you. I feel I have much to learn about WS (I wonder if the History page was unclear). How desperate are you for funding? It seems like it would be worthy of a monthly post in /s/Wikispooks followed by a monthly newsletter. After my first draft is finished in a couple months I plan to spend a fifth of my time on WikiSpooks (with SaidIt, Green Party, my story, and other stuff (graphic design work and life)) - if I can stay focused and balanced.