WEF report explores online “interventions” including content removal, warning labels to "protect kids"

submitted by [deleted] from reclaimthenet.org

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[deleted]

    [–]BISH 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Link to WEF in the article goes nowhere. Why do you believe this obvious bullshit?

    A classic smokescreen disinfo comment.

    A strong indication that the info is "over the target".

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]BISH 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      Your foppish foolery works at Reddit, but not so much around here.

      [–]socks-the-nigger 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Hmph

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I just pooped a little, namaste brother 🙏

      [–]Oyveygoyim 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      How much are they paying you to post your liberal bullshit?

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Oyveygoyim 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

        Do you think it's acceptable for fags in drag to read stories to kids?

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Oyveygoyim 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          That doesn't make it untrue. Any normal person would've replied with a simple "no".

          [–]socks-the-nigger 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Then socks would look very stupid