use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
comedy
The Haitians of Springfield, Ohio.
submitted 17 days ago by ActuallyNot from i0.wp.com
[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 16 days ago* (4 children)
https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/1834641290568384696
https://patriots.win/p/19952xATWb/stealing-and-eating-horses-is-no/c
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (3 children)
Good points. There are idiots who would point to an X Xit expecting people to believe that that refutes the records of no plausible complaints of eating cats.
And the black market in horse meat has been in Florida for years, resulting in the The Good Horse Slaughter Act of 2010, already 14 years ago, only that same year was TPS granted to Haitians after the earthquake.
So to clarify, you're pointing out that these things are in the first case unlikely, and in the second case nothing to do with Haitians.
I look forward to the day when you can clarify your meaning yourself.
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (2 children)
Good points. There are idiots who would point to an X Xit expecting people to believe that that refutes the records of no plausible complaints of eating cats. And the black market in horse meat has been in Florida for years, resulting in the The Good Horse Slaughter Act of 2010, already 14 years ago, only that same year was TPS granted to Haitians after the earthquake. So to clarify, you're pointing out that these things are in the first case unlikely, and in the second case nothing to do with Haitians. I look forward to the day when you can clarify your meaning yourself.
Yes but I'm sure that when people were cutting up horses and eating them that they actually own the horses, unlike the Haitians that are stealing ducks that belong to the city and stealing pets that belong to the residents of the city, which is an entirely different thing all together.
Please notice that you seem to be unable to have a conversation without calling people insulting words like how you use the words idiots above.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (1 child)
I'm sure that when people were cutting up horses and eating them that they actually own the horses,
Nah. Floridians have been stealing and butchering horses for decades.
For instance:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/sports/prized-horse-is-led-out-of-stall-and-butchered-in-florida.html
unlike the Haitians that are stealing ducks that belong to the city and stealing pets that belong to the residents of the city, which is an entirely different thing all together.
You haven't worked out that that's bullshit yet?
Here's summer reporting about the fact that JD Vance admitted to making up the story to get the attention of the press.
Questionable links to articles that he disagrees with to make the argument that they're made by idiots. Sometimes you have to clarify his meaning because he also links to articles that he thinks make a point. The insults are his sub text.
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (0 children)
Try not to use curse words when you chat with others in public.
And why don't you say something good about your candidate Miss Kamala? Surely you can go on and on about her good job she's done as vice President?
[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 17 days ago (32 children)
Typical Trump and MAGATs attacking the US, one community at a time. Why anyone would vote for this is a mystery to me.
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (30 children)
People tired of the shit from Democrats would.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (5 children)
Such as ... not lying about immigrants eating pets?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (3 children)
Such as DEI.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (2 children)
Yeah. Fuck DEI.
If you want equity and inclusion, go and live somewhere where the truth is held to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.
And if you want diversity, go and live somewhere where most people aren't native.
Like China or something.
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (1 child)
Ask Boeing how their DEI program works for airplane doors and their space program. Low quality by defective people hired because of their gender and or race.
We got equality in the USA, equal rights. Everyone is created equal. We don't have the same outcomes for college and careers. If a person has a PHD in gender studies they won't be able to get a good paying job in business or IT. Not everyone is going to earn 6 figures or end up like Bill Gates.
China has social justice and inclusion with equity, only the Communist government is in charge of everything with an iron fist. Sure they have diversity, but they don't have freedom, which is what DEI is going to do to the USA have us under Communism.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (0 children)
Ignoring the issues raised by staff and inspectors is a business cultural problem. The low quality defective person was Dennis Muilenburg.
A disaster of that scale isn't ground-up.
[–]KyleIsThisTall 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 15 days ago (0 children)
Less than a year ago they were on camera eating other people before they invaded our country and were caught on camera eating pets and poached wildlife.
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 16 days ago (23 children)
Republicans have controlled US politics most of the time since 1980.
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (22 children)
Democrats control Hollywood, News Media, Newspapers, Schools, Colleges, Universities and indoctrinate people using them.
[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 16 days ago (2 children)
Nothing's that simple. Saiditors love to complain about the New World Order, the WEF, the Deep State, yada yada yada. Well guess who controls those wealthy groups. Wealthy assholes. GOP is the party for wealthy assholes, promoting the 'trickle-down economics' lie since 1980, and the middle classes have been decimated because of it. Here's a brief explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32iCWzpDpKs
Democrats are also wealthy assholes, take Apple for example, trillion dollar company pays nothing in taxes because it hides their wealth in an Irish company. Also uses child slave labor to make the iPhone.
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (0 children)
The main point is (again and again), Repugs have had most of the control. Indeed, there have been a few Democrats who've helped the Repugs. I am not arguing that there are no Democrat wealthy assholes. For example, it's very good Pelosi will retire, as she's famously enabled some of the corruption on the Hill. She's also been (along with the majority) against restricting insider trading among elected officials, which is corrupt.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (18 children)
"Education" != "indoctrination".
If educated people disagree with you on policy, have you considered the possibility that they're right, and you're just being a cunt to people less fortunate than yourself?
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (7 children)
"Education" != "indoctrination". If educated people disagree with you on policy, have you considered the possibility that they're right, and you're just being a cunt to people less fortunate than yourself?
The left when losing a debate always throws in insulting words or curse words, because they know that no thinking person wants to continue that conversation and so the left is the one that is left standing last and so they think that they win the argument.
They want to win even if it means throwing insults and curse words, for example the word cunt was used about.
The choice of words was entirely unnecessary and inappropriate.
/u/ActuallyNot
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (6 children)
Ironic claim from someone who's been pasting responses that read like they're from a chat bot.
But you be you.
Of course it's unnecessary. It's not necessary to engage in this conversation at all. My point is that once we've decided to do the unnecessary thing of attempting communication, we should choose words that have the most correct meaning.
I think that an appropriate word for a racist is "cunt". It gets across the negative influence they have on society as well as attempting to address their selfishness that is the basis of their focus of stopping other people doing better for themselves in society.
What do you think an appropriate term for "cunt" is?
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (5 children)
The left when losing a debate always throws in insulting words or curse words, because they know that no thinking person wants to continue that conversation and so the left is the one that is left standing last and so they think that they win the argument. Ironic claim from someone who's been pasting responses that read like they're from a chat bot. But you be you. The choice of words was entirely unnecessary and inappropriate. Of course it's unnecessary. It's not necessary to engage in this conversation at all. My point is that once we've decided to do the unnecessary thing of attempting communication, we should choose words that have the most correct meaning. I think that an appropriate word for a racist is "cunt". It gets across the negative influence they have on society as well as attempting to address their selfishness that is the basis of their focus of stopping other people doing better for themselves in society. What do you think an appropriate term for "cunt" is?
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (4 children)
As of 2022, 98.7% of Springfield, OH residents were US citizens, which is higher than the national average of 93.5%.
The 2022 Population, 135,877 which was a 0.114% 1-year decline.
As of 2022, 2.13% of Springfield, OH residents (2.89k people) were born outside of the United States, which is lower than the national average of 13.6%.
It looks to me like this "crisis" is a hallucination.
[–]partjd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (1 child)
As of 2022, 98.7% of Springfield, OH residents were US citizens, which is higher than the national average of 93.5%. The 2022 Population, 135,877 which was a 0.114% 1-year decline. As of 2022, 2.13% of Springfield, OH residents (2.89k people) were born outside of the United States, which is lower than the national average of 13.6%. https://datausa.io/profile/geo/springfield-oh It looks to me like this "crisis" is a hallucination.
https://datausa.io/profile/geo/springfield-oh It looks to me like this "crisis" is a hallucination.
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 15 days ago (1 child)
"""residents"""
📺.
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (7 children)
Educated does not mean smart, you can have a doctorate and still be stupid. I met people with PHDs in computer science that didn't know the basics of how a computer works.
Educated does not mean smart, you can have a doctorate and still be stupid.
Standards vary intuition to institution. But you've got to get decent marks to be accepted into postgraduate courses.
I met people with PHDs in computer science that didn't know the basics of how a computer works.
That's not intelligence. That's knowledge.
And I suspect you misjudged them. Where did they get their Ph.D in computer science?
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago* (0 children)
Educated does not mean smart, you can have a doctorate and still be stupid. Standards vary intuition to institution. But you've got to get decent marks to be accepted into postgraduate courses. I met people with PHDs in computer science that didn't know the basics of how a computer works. That's not intelligence. That's knowledge. And I suspect you misjudged them. Where did they get their Ph.D in computer science?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (4 children)
All getting high marks shows is that they have a Photographic memory, not that they can use that memory with logic and reason and critical thinking to be useful.
https://phys.org/news/2018-07-beware-scientific-studiesmost-wrong.html
Most scientific studies are wrong, because failing the hypothesis means no more funding from the sponsor.
Computers need intelligence to work out, everything is math and logic.
All getting high marks shows is that they have a Photographic memory,
A good memory is related to being able to learn things. Which is intelligence.
But you can't generally get good marks by memorising things. You certainly can't get a PhD that way.
because failing the hypothesis means no more funding from the sponsor.
No. Science isn't funded by a "sponsor" who requires particular findings.
Which are examples of courses that can't be passed by memorising.
Where did the people you met with PHDs in computer science that didn't know the basics of how a computer works get their Ph.D in computer science?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 15 days ago (1 child)
https://irisreading.com/is-memory-a-sign-of-intelligence-quick-facts/
Not all educated people disagree with me. Not my fault there are educated stupid people believing what they are told by Democrats without investigating it.
Democrats did say that Haitians haven't been resting pets, I suppose.
If course that has turned out to be true now that JD Vance has admitted making the pet eating story up.
What would we have found out if we'd investigated it, and weren't stupid?
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (0 children)
Why anyone would vote for either candidate is beyond me. Maybe you call fill me in? Try to convince me to vote, let’s pretend I am on the fence. Why should I vote? Lol
[–]PragmaticStoicism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (2 children)
The left is off their fucking rocker. This is why the right needs to organize and defend themselves through strength and numbers. There is no talking to people this unhinged.
The left is off their fucking rocker.
Yeah. Not lying about a group of people eating pets is absolutely nuts.
How the fuck are we supposed to deal with people not telling blatant lies that attempt to set American against American?
This is why the right needs to organize and defend themselves through strength and numbers. There is no talking to people this unhinged.
That's Right. By jumping straight to setting Americans against Americans we can do an end-run around demagoguery, and get straight to the shooting each other.
I think they've been brainwashed or hypnotized or something..
[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 16 days ago (0 children)
This is a good example of gaslighting.
Something that actually not is very good at, so not unexpected.
Denial of reality mixed with reversal of reality. Leftists are psychotically delusional.
[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (32 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (30 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]KyleIsThisTall 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (23 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (22 children)
[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (18 children)
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]partjd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]PragmaticStoicism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]partjd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]KyleIsThisTall 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)