The Greatest Depression - The Age of Terror was inaugurated with a series of controlled demolitions in New York City on September 11, 2001. Now the world is being led into the Age of Biological Terror with a controlled demolition of the economy.

submitted 4 years ago by [deleted] from youtube.com

25 comments

all 25 comments

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (34 children)

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (33 children)

[–]Deonquantariodre 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)

Is gold even valuable? The internet is highly over used for bullshit, so is copper even valuable since they are replacing it with glass? Seems the only valuable thing is cheap land and ability to homestead. I often wonder why people moved into cities to begin with. I use a site called stolenhistory, the owner is a dick but the users often wonder why cities are abandoned on the site. Maybe people just didn't think it was worth it after a few months. Paying for everything they wanted and if the "flow" was bad, they had no money to get what they wanted/needed. While on their farm they had control and no artificial market. I'm sure the living has pluses/minuses. The "empty cities" might be because humans aren't well off in those conditions. We based society on a very fragile economy, and have billions of people. If we look at india, they don't have a good life, personally I want wide open ranges of nature bc it always ensures things we need as we are a nature harvesting mammal. I'm not putting down the great things we did bc of it, just being a hillbilly certainly doesn't create electricity. Save for great inventors that lived in small communities and basically created wireless with no schooling. Meh, I dunno man it's pretty complex.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (28 children)

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (27 children)

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (26 children)

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (24 children)

[deleted]

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (22 children)

Interesting, thanks. That's far more plausible and makes plenty of sense.

Were not most quarters and half-dollars silver up until around the 1960's? I'd assume the amount of silver of melt was nowhere close to the vaule they were manipulated to carry.

Supplement it by silver certificates, issued upon deposit of silver.

So these certificates would be paper, which would equal a portion of the amount of silver you own.

Using the good old method of free coinage, silver could enter into circulation free of debt, free of interest, outside the control of bankers. In this way the unit of account and currency would one and the same.

Seems reasonable to me, but the bankers, nor wall-street would ever let that happen. They'd try to destroy teh economy if something like that was imposed.

In 1914, (january 4) Henry Ford introduced the $5-a-day minimum wage in his factories. At the time a model-T automobile sold for $250.00. A man could have collected his 5 coins every day, and eventually carry 250 coins to a dealer and drive home in model-T; or saved his coins in bank, then ask for 2 $100 and 1 $50 silver certificates, then go to the dealer.

That seems far easier than the current system we have today!

Let gold find its own level, buy what it buys; but never be a unit or a standard.

Other than Silver, would there be any other metals that could be or have been used as a unit or standard?

SO, implementing silver certificates would make government bonds obsolete? Would this not reduce taxes, and also manipulation, boom and bust cycles, etc.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago* (21 children)

[deleted]

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (6 children)

If we make barley the unit of account, we always have to use currency

You could use barley but it's perishable. So, the point is to use tangible metals that are not perishable, that would then make the object both currency and a unit of account. Correct?

The way silver certificates worked: a person who had a hundred dollars' worth of pure silver (or multiples) had to deposit that silver in the Treasury and received certificates for it; the silver was sitting in the Treasury.

What's to say the treasury doesn't lie about the amount of silver reserves they have? If the silver certificates did exist, there would be a battle for eternity between the real hard-money men and the looting foreign bankers and their lackeys.

So, in the case of banks, would not silver certificate deposits and withdrawls simply be storage houses for the silver you own? No credit would be attached to these houses. So, essentially they would not be banks.

So, if government bonds were eliminated, government would not have to pay back interest to the FED? Would then debt accrued exist, at least for governemnt? And how would one obtain a loan in this case? Would they even need one?

Just trying to learn, much of this is new to me, and I'm quite interested.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (5 children)

[deleted]

continue this thread

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (13 children)

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (12 children)

[deleted]

continue this thread

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)

[+][deleted] 4 years ago* (4 children)

[deleted]

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (3 children)

Murray Rothbard is an economist of the Austrian school, a theoretician of anarcho-capitalism, a staunch advocate of historical revisionism and a central figure in the 20th-century American libertarian movement.

Rothbard states that fractional reserve central banking is an utter fraud, which I agree with, but his theories about Ancapism will surely lead to a dictator in no time.

Rothbard criticized the "frenzied nihilism" of left-wing libertarians, but also criticized right-wing libertarians who were content to rely only on education to bring down the state; he believed that libertarians should adopt any moral tactic available to them in order to bring about liberty.

According to Mullins:

Rothbard was sponsored by the Cato Institute, a "conservative" group whose director, Earl C. Ravenel, is also director of the Institute for Policy Studies, the leftwing policy-making organization founded by James Paul Warburg.

Mullins makes the case that Reagan was a Libertarian Marxist, who was in well-standing with the neoconservative (neo-Troskyites). In fact, Mullins believes that the Libertarian movement is largely a fraud to bring about communism through the backdoor. Rothbard seems to attack both sides of the radical libertarian spectrum.

The best U.S. history book is the record of congress.

Yes, which I have found on Yamaguchy and have been reading very carefully. It's quite an interesting read.

I know who the owners and pushers of the greenback system wwere; they were Frankfurt bankers, many of whome were Jews but also some of Swiss descent such as Seligman, whose son would then go on to push for income taxes in the 1930's. Belmont, Warburg, Schiff and Loeb, were also quite close to the House of Rothschild.

As for Baring and Brothers, was that a British bank?

So, Jackson the bank killer was simply an agent for another bank, ie the Frankfurt school of bankers?

Were the Rothschilds and Frankfurt bankers in opposition to the British banking establishment? I ask this because I have tead many books which state that the Rothschild own the Bank of London, although zero evidence is usually given.

The Rothschilds are from Frankfurt, so why did Jackson want to open a house of NMR in london.

What does NMR mean, if you don't mind me asking?

Jackson picked the house of Rothschild as fiscal agent of the United States in Europe (which at the time meant the world) ?

Where can I find this specific information.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)

No; Jackson wasn't an agent. Rothschild liked what he was doing because it served their purpose.

Thanks for making this clearer. That makes a lot more sense. So, like Napoleon, the Rothschild's thanked Jackson after his death for the simple reason being that they were in conflict with another banking establishment that Jackson opposed and this they could take advantage of this opportunity. Is this correct?

Could it have been done if New York bankers didn't support it ?

I don't know, probably not, but I would need to find evidence in legislature archives or in the transcrpts of the bankers' lackeys in congress who opposed the renewal of the bank.

Rothschild movie the national socialist made, he is in it.

Never heard or saw that, that sounds fascinating, nonetheless. Of course you read on the Internet that the NS were Rothschild agents. Apparently, accounting for all the disinformation, everyone is a Rothschild agent.

So, Baring and Brothers was notc onnected to the Rothschilds?

So, which banks in the US did the Rothschilds own or were agents to and how did these banks differ to those of their banking competitors who also wished to rule in America?

conspiracy

conspiracy

MODERATORS