all 38 comments

[–]BeautifuLusers 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I guess those straight edgers were right all along.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Well they kinda put it in the name, hahaha. I dig your posts lord.

[–]tomatosplat 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (27 children)

Support israel has nothing to do with wars to control heroin trade, or Iraqi oil. That is just basic human rights shit.people launching missiles out of the windows of schools toward population centers is not okay. I wholly support Israel, and their right to exist.

Any argument against that is an argument for muslim-caliphate-minded-individuals to commit atrocities. Period.

Those two wars were illegal and spilled over into dozens of neighboring countries and costs MILLIONS of lives- so far

[–]Jesus[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

Israel LLC is a corporation and a racist enthnostate propped up by welfare and weapons.

Israeli intelligence and 5th column ZioCons in the US orchestrated the demolition of the twin towers.

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

I have a friend who was attached to (edit- can't remember the number of the division designation) marine amphibious division.. He told me flat out- their was on guard a marine platoon to block the parking garage and no one was to be let in-dignitaries or anything, on Sept 6-8 2001. I know somebody did it, but I doubt it was israel.

When you look around the table, and you can't tell who the sucker is: it's you.

[–]Jesus[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

It was 100% Israeli intelligence and the 5th column within the US government and executive order. It was the catylyzt for PNAC aspirations and the Yinon plan which is the Israeli plan for Global War on Terror facade.

Now, did non-Israeli linked US government officials and think tanks likely know what was to transpire? Yes sure. But all we have to do is see who owned, operated, was the security, stopped litigation, and covered-up the event, in every position sat q ZioCon aligned with the Likud.

Why was Bush reading a children's book in Florida? Observe his face and you can clearly see that he was fooled. That now he understood why he was selected as president.

9/11 was a hijacked theory. That is, many different groups were able to use it FOR THEIR OWN AGENDAS. The US in Adghanistan for UNOCAL. Israel for Yinon, and Balkenization campaign as well as the Askanaz pipeline.

Rabbi Dov Zakhiem, SPC, unaccounted for trillions, he as comptroller at the Pentagon, him working for a company that soecializes in remote-guided passenger jet systems, and working formerally for Tridata which redid the fireproofing in WTC7, suggests a Zionist job.

Read: Christopher Bollyn, David Ray Griffin and Graeme MacQueen.

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

WTC7 did not catch on fire, official story is that they demolished it on purpose to reduce the risk of fires spreading. That is not disputed.

(It was at first, but they got caught because 200 million people watched it live on TV- and half of them heard the call for the demolition)

Also, why would you need a remote control when there are billions of hajis ready and willing to die flying it. Hajis are cheaper than modified airliners.

I have no doubt that some of the people involved were Jewish, Muslim, and Catholic, that does not prove that the pope or ben netanyahu called the shots. You don't have to go overseas to find people that want to destroy the US from the inside-out.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You might want to double check your "official story" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Something besides wikipedia's please. That's just shit that's added by your average internet user, fact checked against another typical internet user.

Wikipedia is about as credible a source as the cat walking across the keyboard- being auto-corrected by microsoft.

You got an official from World, or Brittanica?

Or how about an investigative journalist (they used to exist) https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/others/2020/05/world-trade-center-7-building-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-report

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Sorry bro, I only research the unofficial story. If you want to tell me how many nukes Israel has though, I may reconsider.

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

As many as LBJ sent.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Hey, you're alright. Seriously though, wikipedia exists to solidify the mainstream narrative concerning events. It is the most reliable source for the official narrative. If you want references, they are there. NIST decided, that's that.

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was guna add the NIST response, but "they're doing maintenance"https://wtcdata.nist.gov/

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 1

Have you read the Talmud, Lurianic Cabala or Zohar? Do you know what they say about Yeshua and goyim? The amount of filth, degeneracy and supremacy filled within these books written by scribes is horrific. That is precisely why they barred anyone from transcribing the Talmud into English and other languages.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjySezcXsAAgP-S.jpg

Ultra-orthodox Jews:

"We Killed Jesus, And We'll Kill You Too"

Secondly, if you actually read a book, you'd know that 9/11 and the Bin Laden charade was a false flag orchestrated by Mossad and the 5th column ZioCons within the US and the latter person was merely a US military asset.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EhK187fXsAAaWVf.jpg

...solidified ties with Israel...

Anyone can see that Al Qaeda was a propped-up faux jihadist group used as a proxy and pretext for imperialist aspirations. They are military assets and have been for a long time. Why do you think the Saudi's were blamed for 9/11 but also Bin Laden, who was an enemy of the Saudis?

Osama bin Laden's niece is a Trump supporter who has also backed the QAnon conspiracy theory movement, it's not even a covert PsyOp, it is beyond retarded. It is for the slow brained person.

Bin laden died in December of 2001 from Kidney failure, he was on a dialysis machine:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6497442-osama-bin-laden

https://www.amazon.com/Osama-Bin-Laden-Dead-Alive/dp/1566567831

Just because we might thaw bin laden's corpse and roll 'em out for an october surprise doesn't mean the global war of terror will stop. But they didn't do that.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_H44IkuSV9qQ/SD8PKQeTYzI/AAAAAAAAEF8/a9OBgwFRvYs/s200/osama_located.jpg

Thirdly, 9/11 was a Mossad job and a cabalistic Purim holocaust used as a pretext for the Yinon agenda.

9-11 is Purim for Goys written by Maurice Pinay


Everywhere in the establishment media the question is being raised, "what have we learned since 9-11?" and everywhere the answers given are calculated to assure that nothing truly relevant is learned about the fundamental function of this recurring 9-11 psychodrama. Those with an understanding of the religion of Judaism will have at least a faint understanding of what has happened to the West since 9-11.

In Judaism, Judaic people are re-traumatized each year by a tale of paranoia and vengeance from the book of Esther according to which 'The Jews' are allegedly threatened with annihilation but then preemptively annihilate their perceived attackers first.

Since 9-11, the West is annually re-traumatized by a solemn retelling of the 9-11 terror attacks in a not-very-subtle justification for ongoing alleged preemptive vengeance.

(Note however that 9-11 only grants Goys (non-Jews) permission to attack 'enemies' selected for them by the Judaic establishment: people and nations constituting obstacles to the 'greater Israel' project. Goys don't have the Judaic establishment's permission to bring their real enemies to justice who very often are part of, or servants of, the Judaic establishment themselves. This may be evident to those who understand the two-tiered, double-standard nature and 'Noahide'/Judaic relationship of the religion of Judaism. 9-11 is, strictly speaking, a 'Noahide' version of Purim.

It makes sense considering nearly everyone involved in 9/11 and pushing the war on terror, was either a Zionist shabbos goy or a Zionsit Jew such as Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Kristol, Kagan, Libby, Wolfowitz, among hundreds of others.

According to Judaism, the universe and everything in it exists only to serve 'The Jews.'

A 'Noahide' is a non-Judaic person who has resigned himself to live according to this delusion, therefore his existence is valid only to the degree that he is a servant to Judaic interests. The paranoia and rage fostered in non-Judaic people by the annual retelling of the 9-11 terror attack is valid only to the degree that it's channeled to advance Judaic interests; in support for destruction of more countries in the proximity of the 'greater Israel' project.)

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/03/purim-subversion-and-vengeance.html

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/09/more-on-amalek.html

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/09/amalek-haman-and-ahmadinejad.html

Israel wants to expand its borders to fulfil 1 Kings 4:21, Genesis 15:18; Exodus 23:30-31; Deut 11:24; Josh 1:4, and because it wants to build the Third Temple where the Dome of the Rock now stands. These goals require war with Islam - why not get the US to do it for them, using the oil issue as a smokescreen to hide the religious motive?

The Washington Times published an article on September 10, 2001, which says that Mossad is capable of attacking Western targets and making it look as if others (Palestinians etc) did it: http://www.public-action.com/911/sams.html.


Now, sure, 9/11 was utilzied by all kinds of groups to push through their geopolitical agendas, but I want to make something very clear... ZIoCons demolished the towers contracting ACE and LVI to rig them. Silverstein, Lowy, Lauder, Eisenberg, Kroll and Greenberg, all Jewish Zionists were involved in the securization of the towers for demolition, as was the ZioCon controlled port authority.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 2

Background on the Chabadnik Spirit; what does the Talmud say?


Oh okay... you want to debunk this then? And even Torah justice is ridiculous. A Jew rapes a women without her consent, they go to court. Under a sanhedrin the man would have to say sorry and then marry her for life and never divorce her. JUSTICE.

You wonder why Ultra-orthodox Jews have to suck the genitals of infants penis after circumcision, or that there is rampant pedophilia in the Jewish religious community, not much different than the Catholic community.

We are told there is a movement afoot to make pederasty (child-adult sex) socially acceptable and legally permissible. Researching the issue, we find that many dominant voices on both sides of the controversy are Jewish.

How is this possible?

Talmud law permits sexual intercourse between children and adults. This doctrine is contained in a number of Mishnahs. Before we examine them, however, it is necessary that the reader be familiar with the word kethubah.

According to the Soncino Talmud Glossary:

KETHUBAH (Lit., 'a written [document]'); (a) a wife's marriage settlement which she is entitled to recover on her being divorced or on the death of her husband. The minimum settlement for a virgin is two hundred zuz, and for a widow remarrying one hundred zuz; (b) the marriage contract specifying the mutual obligations between husband and wife and containing the amount of the endowment and any other special financial obligations assumed by the husband.

--- Babylonian Talmud, Soncino Talmud Glossary

Zuz is a unit of currency. We see, then, that a dollar (or zuz) value is put on virginity.

Now let's look at a Mishnah from Kethuboth 11a:

MISHNAH. WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN (7) HAS HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH (8) A LITTLE GIRL, (9) OR WHEN A SMALL BOY (10) HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR [WHEN A GIRL WAS ACCIDENTALLY] INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD (11) — [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ] …

---Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11a Soncino 1961 Edition, page 57

The translator, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, amplifies the text with footnotes:

A man who was of age. Lit., 'who came on'. Less than three years old. Less than nine years of age. Lit., 'One who was injured by wood', as a result of which she injured the hymen.

Let's review the above-cited Mishnah: "When a grown-up man has had sexual intercourse with a little girl, or when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman …" It is obvious that sex activity between a grown man and a little girl, and between a grown woman and a little boy, is a part of the woof and the warp of everyday Talmud life; such relationships, in the eyes of the Sages, are unremarkable. There is no prohibition on sexual activity between adults and young children — it is simply regulated. Recall the words of the Very Reverend the Chief Rabbi of the British Empire the late Dr. Joseph Herman Hertz:

Religion in the Talmud attempts to penetrate the whole of human life with the sense of law and right. Nothing human is in its eyes mean or trivial; everything is regulated and sanctified by religion. Religious precept and duty accompany man from his earliest years to the grave and beyond it. They guide his desires and actions at every moment.

--- Rabbi Dr. Hertz

Babylonian Talmud, "Foreword," Seder Nezikin Vol. I, pages xxv-xxvi

Thus, if the Talmud permits girls three years old and younger to be sexually used by adults, that is the law. The concern of the Sages is to ensure that the adult is not, technically speaking, in violation of any of the rules.

In the Gemara that follows the Mishnah of Kethuboth 11a (cited above), the Sages discuss the issues. They say having intercourse with a girl younger than three is like putting a finger in the eye. Rabbi Dr. Daiches explains in the footnotes that, just as tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.

GEMARA. Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood. (1) When I said it before Samuel he said: 'Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply to (2) flesh. Some teach this teaching by itself: (3) [As to] a small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman, Rab said, he makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood; whereas Samuel said: 'Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply to flesh. R. Oshaia objected: WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN HAS HAD INTERCOURSE WITH A LITTLE GIRL, OR WHEN A SMALL BOY HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR WHEN A GIRL WAS ACCIDENTALLY INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD — [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]; SO ACCORDING TO R. MEIR. BUT THE SAGES SAY: A GIRL WHO WAS INJURED ACCIDENTALLY BY A PIECE OF WOOD — HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH! (4) Raba said, It means (5) this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, (6) it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; (7) but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood,' and [with regard to the case of] 'a girl injured by a piece of wood,' itself, there is the difference of opinion between R. Meir and the Sages.

--- Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11b Soncino 1961 Edition, page 57-58

Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches amplifies the text with footnotes (page 58):

  • Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.

  • Lit., 'is not in'.

  • I.e., the difference of opinion between Rab and Samuel with regard to that question was recorded without any reference to R. Judah.

  • The Sages differ only with regard to a girl injured by a piece of wood, but not with regard to a small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman. This shows that the latter case cannot be compared with the former case. The Mishnah would consequently be against Rab and for Samuel.

  • Lit., 'says'.

  • Lit., 'here', that is, less than three years old.

  • I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years. Cf. Nid. 45a.

To a person unaccustomed with the Talmud culture, it may seem that discussion of sexual intercourse between grown men and very young girls is merely theoretical. But as we shall see, cases are cited, judgments are weighed and debated, and the Sages discuss the wounds suffered by the young girls as a result of the intercourse.

MISHNAH. A WOMAN PROSELYTE, A WOMAN CAPTIVE, AND A WOMAN SLAVE, WHO HAVE BEEN REDEEMED, CONVERTED, OR FREED [WHEN THEY WERE] LESS THAN THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY OLD — THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]. AND THERE IS WITH REGARD TO THEM THE CLAIM OF [NON-]VIRGINITY. (17)

---- Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11a Soncino 1961 Edition, page 54

This seems like a generous and humanitarian ruling, the creation of a legal fiction of virginity when the woman is no longer physiologically a virgin. But Dr. Daiches corrects us. He tells us that, according to the Sages, the hymen of a girl younger than three literally grows back again.

If they had sexual intercourse before they were three years and one day old the hymen would grow again, and they would be virgins. V. 9a and 11b and cf. Nid. 44b and 45a.

--- Rabbi Dr. Daiches

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 3

See also the discussion of Niddah 44b and 45a, below.

As we continue to explore the Talmud doctrines on child-adult sex, we will see further confirmation that the Talmud Sages believed that the hymen regenerates in a girl younger than three.

"… Of Lesser Age, No Guilt is Incurred"

In modern America, sex between an adult and a child is condemned in proportion to the youth of the child. That is, Americans generally consider sex with a fifteen year old, a twelve year old, a six year old, and a three-year-old on a continuous scale of condemnation. The younger the child, the greater the condemnation.

Talmudic law works on the reverse scale: sex with younger children is less significant than sex with older children. How did this doctrine come about?

Scripture states thus:

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

The Old Testament prohibits a man lying with a man; but notice, the Old Testament does not prohibit a man lying with a boy. Thus, the Talmud Sages arrive at their position on pederasty. In the following, bestiality said to be committed "naturally" when a man uses the vaginal passage of the beast, and "unnaturally" when a man uses the anal passage of the beast. The Sages make a similar distinction for the couplings of a woman with a beast.

GEMARA. … Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that. What is the basis of their dispute? — Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect]. But Samuel maintains: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman. (4)

It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; [55a] [he] who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally; or a woman who causes herself to be bestially abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment.

— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 54b - 55a; Soncino 1961 Edition, page 371

The translator, Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman, amplifies the text with footnotes. Note particularly footnote 2: "… but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred." See also the final sentence of footnote 5: "… nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable." (See Soncino Talmud Glossary for definition of Baraitha.)

I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.

At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.

Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three.

(Rashi reads [H] instead of the [H] in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day who commits etc.] There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first — a male aged nine years and a day — refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning — because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult party, why single out pederasty: in all crimes of incest, the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rab's contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable.

The plain English meaning of the Talmud text is clear, but if there is any doubt, the Soncino scholars put the matter to rest: No guilt is incurred with a boy child younger than nine, even in incest. Thus we see that Orthodox Jewish doctrines concerning homosexuality are not accurately represented by Dr. Laura and other Orthodox spokesmen.

Out of Context?


When quoted, those passages in Tractate Sanhedrin 54b and 55a are sometimes said to be taken out of context. Theologian James Trimm is one who makes this protest.(6) But now the full context of Sanhedrin 54b and 55a — and indeed, the complete Sanhedrin — is available to the readers of Come and Hear™.

Rabbi Michael Rodkinson, whose English translation of the Talmud was republished in 1918, censored the Sages' teaching on this issue. The 1918 Edition of Rabbi Rodkinson's Talmud was published under the editorship of Rabbi Dr. I. M. Wise, the pioneer of Reform Judaism. Rabbi Rodkinson explains his censorship in a footnote:

We deem it expedient not to translate about two pages of the text preceding the next Mishna, treating of miserable crimes with men and animals, and giving the discussion with questions and answers, it would be undesirable to express in the English language …

--- Rabbi Rodkinson

For further discussion, see "Rabbi Rodkinson Censors the Talmud" in Do Not Censor the Talmud, Please.

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/censorship_1.html#rodkinson

Censorship, expurgation, and denial of the clear and obvious meaning of basic religious text do not help inter-religious understanding. It does not help people of different religions understand each others' faiths.

The lack of reliable authoritative information on the doctrines of Judaic law is a significant problem as American society and law becomes more Talmudized. Such information gaps can cause unwanted societal consequences.

America Is Rapidly Becoming Talmudized

In 1999, the Supreme Court agreed to consider an amicus brief based wholly on Talmudic law (see Sentence and Execution).

In November 2002, the American Orthodox Jewish community held a kosher dinner in the Supreme Court building to celebrate the establishment of the National Institute for Judaic Law.(31) The dinner was attended by 200 people, including three Supreme Court Justices. The purpose of the Institute is to introduce Talmudic laws into the US legal system and law schools.

It is thus the clear civic duty of every American to become intimately acquainted with the Talmud. Read articles at:

Death Penalty: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/capunish_1.html

Kosher Dinner: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jp-11-09-2002 and http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jw-01-08-03

In Tractate Niddah, again there is approval for priests to marry and copulate with baby girls. This passage describes a situation in which a priest dies without children, leaving a three-year-old widow. In such case, the priest's brother (the yebam) can acquire the girl by having sexual intercourse with her. The ellipsis (…) in the following Mishna indicates the omission of non-germane text. The full text is available through the link at the Come and Hear™ link, below.

MISHNAH. A GIRL OF THE AGE OF THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY MAY BE BETROTHED BY INTERCOURSE; … IF SHE WAS MARRIED TO A PRIEST, SHE MAY EAT TERUMAH.

--- Babylonian Talmud Tractate Niddah 44b Soncino 1961 Edition, page 308

MISHNAH. A GIRL OF THE AGE OF THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY MAY BE BETROTHED BY INTERCOURSE; … IF ONE WAS YOUNGER THAN THIS AGE INTERCOURSE WITH HER IS LIKE PUTTING A FINGER IN THE EYE.

--- Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Niddah 44b Soncino 1961 Edition, page 309

MISHNAH. IF A YOUNG GIRL, WHOSE AGE OF MENSTRUATION HAS NOT YET ARRIVED, MARRIED, BETH SHAMMAI RULED: SHE IS ALLOWED FOUR NIGHTS, AND BETH HILLEL RULED: UNTIL THE WOUND IS HEALED.

--- abylonian Talmud, Tractate Niddah 64b Soncino 1961 Edition, page 454

Old Fashioned Torah Rules


At a time when Americans are displaying an ever-increasing interest in all things Jewish — from kabbala to Senator Joseph Lieberman to "Kosher Sex" — Dr. Laura is the most popular source for a healthy dose of Jewish nagging, guilt trips and what she presents as lessons in good old-fashioned Torah values.

"Orthodox Group Honors Dr. Laura," Forward: http://www.forward.com/issues/2001//01.03.02/news6.html

We have seen in Numbers 31:12-18 that Moses permitted grown men to use little girls as concubines. In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to have sexual intercourse with female babies and children, and homosexual relations with boys younger than nine.

Those "good old fashioned Torah values" are not quite as Christian America remembers them.

In the following passage, the Sages discuss the use of contraception. All the Sages agree that a wife younger than eleven — a wife who is too young to become pregnant — is required to carry on "marital intercourse" in the normal manner. Recall that those brides can be as young as three, and sometimes younger

GEMARA. … Three classes of woman may use an absorbent (1) in their marital intercourse: (2) A minor, and an expectant and a nursing mother. The minor,(3) because otherwise she might become pregnant and die. An expectant mother, (3) because otherwise she might cause her foetus to degenerate into a sandal. (4) A nursing mother, (3) because otherwise she might have to wean her child prematurely, (5) and this would result in his death. And what is the age of such a 'minor'? (6) From the age of eleven years and one day to the age of twelve years and one day. One who is under (7) or over this age (8) must carry on her marital intercourse in a normal manner; so R. Meir. But the Sages ruled: The one as well as the other carries on her marital intercourse in a normal manner and mercy (9) will be vouchsafed from heaven, for it is said in Scripture, The Lord preserveth the simple (10) …

--- Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Niddah 45a Soncino 1961 Edition, page 311

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 4

A report in the Baltimore Jewish Times in February 2000 gives an account of a custody dispute in Italy. Moshe and Tali Dulberg (sometimes "Dolberg"), Israeli citizens living in Genoa, were divorced. Custody of the couple's two girls was initially given to the mother, Tali. In 1996, Tali was converted to Orthodox Judaism and remarried. Moshe brought suit for custody of the daughters, asserting that Tali, as an Orthodox Jew, was now unfit to care for the girls. The court awarded custody to the father. When arguing the case, Moshe presented to the court the findings of two psychologists. The Baltimore Jewish Times states of the psychologists:

They charged Orthodox Judaism views "exploitation and cruelty to minors as legitimate … and perverted behavior as normal." They compared Orthodox parents to drug addicts in their inability to serve as a "loving source of affection" for their children.

The court, guided by the assumption that the lifestyle of normal Italian children is self-evidently better, characterized the Lubavitch movement, through which Tali originally became religious, as a "totalitarian sect."

Thus, Mr. Dulberg won absolute authority over all educational decisions involving Nitzan and Danielle, with the explicit goal that they be exposed to the full range of Italian culture and a "normal life."

"Mortara Affair Revisited," Jewish Media Resources from Baltimore Jewish Times http://www.jewishmediaresources.org/article/264

Note the abbreviated nature of the Baltimore Jewish Times coverage. The Times presents only the psychologists' conclusions and infers the Italians are bigots. However, the court must have seen the psychologists' evidence and arguments, and the court must have been convinced. The Times does not describe the Orthodox Jewish doctrines and practices that prompted the psychologists' concerns.

Nathan Lewin, an Orthodox Jewish Washington, DC lawyer, and Rabbi Raphael Butler, the executive Vice President of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America ("Orthodox Union") at that time, arranged a meeting at the Italian Embassy in Washington, DC to protest the Genoa ruling. Mr. Lewin and Rabbi Butler should have been familiar with the details of the psychologists' testimony and the court's decision. They should have known the doctrines and the practices that worried the psychologists, and they should have been direct and forthright in correcting the record if the psychologists and the court were in error. Even if the psychologists offered no arguments or evidence to support their conclusions and the court reached its decision in the absence of information, Mr. Lewin and Rabbi Butler should have been quick to point out the folly.

Mr. Lewin wrote a follow-up letter summarizing the visit.(42) According to Mr. Lewin's account, neither he nor Rabbi Butler addressed the court's concern. Instead, Mr. Lewin and Rabbi Butler changed the subject: They charged that, in coming to its decision, the Italian court violated the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (We met Nathan Lewin in Sentence and Execution,[40] and watched him misrepresent Talmud death penalty law in the brief he wrote and presented to the US Supreme Court.)

Rabbi Butler's Orthodox Union also organized a letter-writing campaign targeting Italian public officials. A prepared letter was posted on the Orthodox Union web page.(43) A review of the letter reveals the same scarcity of information: It contains no specifics concerning the doctrines or practices that worried the psychologists, and no attempt to demonstrate that their concerns are misplaced or in error. Instead, the Orthodox Union urges supporters to protest the "injustice" of the ruling, and to scold the Italians for violating the UN International Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The following Italian officials are targeted:

  • Mayor of Venice Massimo Cacciani

  • Office of the Minister of Justice Min. Oliviero Diliberto

  • Min. Lamberto Dini

  • Fabrizio Rende

  • Ambassador Sergio Vento

  • Counsellor Mauro Politi

  • Ambassador Ferdinando Salleo

  • President Carlo Azeglio Ciampi

  • Prime Minister Massimo D'Alema

From the Orthodox Jewish perspective, surely this strategy is unwise. If the mother's case has merit, her case should be fought on its merit. But instead, Orthodox Jewry is organizing a letter-writing campaign to sway the judge and public officials with political pressure.

In November 1999, Capt. Dr. Sharon, Israeli psychologist and captain in the Israeli Defense Force (IDF), wrote a report supporting the mother's case. Like Mr. Lewin and Rabbi Butler, Capt. Dr. Sharon does not address any specifics: He makes no attempt to discuss the psychologists' arguments or which Judaic doctrines and practices caused the concern, and he makes no attempt to show their concerns were misplaced. Like Mr. Lewin and Rabbi Butler, Capt. Dr. Sharon changes the subject and claims the court's decision violated the UN's convention on The Rights of the Child.

What can a rational, unbiased observer conclude? If the Italian psychologists' concerns are based on misinformation about Orthodox Judaism, the representatives of Orthodox Judaism (and the Israeli psychologist) should correct the misinformation. But since the material issues are being avoided, what should a reasonable person conclude?

Could the psychologists be worried about the Talmud laws and doctrines we have discussed in Sex with Children by Talmud Rules? If so, how can issues concerning child welfare be settled unless people are forthright about their religious beliefs? How can people of different faiths come to an understanding if there is a lack of candor?

Post Script: In an ironic sequel, Rabbi Raphael Butler, Vice President of the Orthodox Union, was forced to retire over a child sex abuse case. This from the Star-Ledger of January 23, 2001:

Sex scandal fallout ends rabbi-exec's career 01/23/01


Quoted:

The sex and abuse scandal that has laid waste to the reputation of a prominent Bergen County rabbi has now claimed the career of the chief executive of the largest Orthodox Jewish organization in the world.

Rabbi Raphael Butler of Queens resigned Friday as executive vice president of the Manhattan-based Orthodox Union, less than a month after a special investigative commission found that inaction at the top of the organization allowed decades of abuse by Rabbi Baruch Lanner of Fair Lawn to continue unchecked.

The resignation took effect immediately, and there was no attempt to sugarcoat it as the Orthodox Union made it clear that Butler quit because he was one of the leaders who knew about Lanner's activities long before they were made public.

Lanner was found to have abused — sexually, physically and emotionally — teenagers entrusted to his care while he ran the New Jersey region of the National Conference of Synagogue Youth, the Orthodox Union's youth organization, and worked at two New Jersey yeshivas, both of them high schools.

Criminal investigations into Lanner's activities in Bergen and Monmouth counties are continuing.

source & full story: http://www.njo.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/jersey/ledger/121f0f2.html

END QUOTE

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 5

It "collapsed" due to explosive mechanisms, which is quite clear based on all the laws of physics broken if it had been a natural collapse. Most architects who are not tied to government and the Likud, including many demolition experts, one of whom had died in a car accident many years ago, have publically stated that the towers were and could have only been demolished to account for near free-fall collapse into the greatest path of resistance. Now had it been a natural gravitational collapse, we would not observe the dustification of bones and teeth, steel girders being projectiled laterally and even at times vertically upward at a near 100 mph falling blocks from the towers facade; discovering high-tech militry grade residues in the towers dust, molten steel being found near the towers core beams, clear and evident cutter charge splits on many of the base of the core beams, hundreds of witnesses seeing, hearing or being injured by explosives before, during and well after the "planes" hit the facade of the towers in all regions of the building, including, the basement B4 levels. Many firemen and families who lost loved ones on 9/11 know that the government lied to them and was either complicit or orchestrated the attack as a pretext for thr Global War on Terror.

Please, I invite you to watch just a few documentaries and possibly read a few papers publshed by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Search: September 11th New Pearl Harbor by Massimo Mazzuco, which has been censored many times on YouTube but appears to be back up on smaller channels. It is around 5hrs long.

The entire WTC complex was privatized; owned and controlled including the port authority by Zionists aligned with the Likud. Don't forget that last part.

Jews like Said and Shahak among thousands of others who expose the terrorism of the Likud which was formerly the Irgun which stemmed from Jewish supremacist groups that killed and terrorized the Palestinians just like they tried to do on 9/11 by blaming the attacks on Palestinians, by fraudulently showing them celebrating the collapse of the towers when this footage was simply historical archive footage as well as reporters giving them flags to celebrate so that they could get free chocolate cakes, are on the moral sode of history. I believe Jews are anti-Christ but they can still follow Christ. Enemies should be loved but also exposed, that doesn't mean I hate all Jews, or any particular group of people.

Now imagine all of this! Imagine you use fraudulent footage to sell to the world your utter hatred and want to kill.

Howard Stern, Jewish, said to all his listeners that the US with Israel should nuke the place, kill everyone there. All based on a lie!

I love Jews, humanist Jews that understand that Israel does not have a right to exist, as it looks today, for Zionism is one of terrorism. It always was and will always be. That doesn't mean Jews shouldn't exist in Palestine or Judah or whereever. For Jews lived among the arab and Christian populations for thousands of years. It was only when Zionists seeked to buy up and colonize the land... before WW2, before camps... that the Palestinians, who have just as much right to exist in that land as their genetic studies prove, fought back.

Zionism in the end will destroy Jews as Israel Shahak and Shlomo Sand contend, they understand this, and I nor they, want this to happen.

Frum, Wolfowitz, Feith, Kristol, Barak, Sumner, Eisenberg, Lauder, Lowy, Levine, Kagan, these are the warmongering Jews that have used you as a scapegoat.

Ask some questions:

Can a 767 travel at exactly the Vd/vmo of its speed? These hijackers couldn't even fly single cessna engines. Most professional pilots will tell you the maneuvers of Flight 77 were impossible without drone technology. And we know that the teo planes that hit the towers flew over Stewart Airport which was the first privitised airport in the US put into legislation by Laudwr and other hardline Likud aligned Zionists. Then read Operation Northwoods.

Here are some links worth watching and reading, I'm happy to provide you with what I know, fortunately, these links do not go into the who, but rather objectively ask questions via the scientific method why the official narrative is impossible:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI1S5ATn-94

Free download, well worth the read, it will download automatically, don't worry, it is from Archietects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

https://bit.ly/2DwjFDl

If you are afraid to download it from the link above, download here:

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/beyond-misinformation

When you, if you, come to the conclusion that 9/11 was an intelligence job as were the Anthrax attacks, then you can research who was behind it:, and it does become quite obvious who was behind it. I for the longest time laughed at the possibility that 9/11 was an intelligence job but researching and reading Graeme MacQueen, Christopher Bollyn and David Dray Griffin's among others books and studies has changed my mind, forever.

https://www.ae911truth.org/

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

https://www.bollyn.com/911/

Evidence


https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/technical-articles

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/near-free-fall-acceleration

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/technical-articles/articles-in-the-journal-of-9-11-studies/421-destruction-of-the-world-trade-center-north-tower-and-fundamental-physics

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/explosive-features

Keep in mind, there are agents within the truth movement, hundreds of agents. Cass Sunstein, a Zionist made it clear, that agents would have to be hired to create infighting in the 9/11 truth movement to break it up. Hence, these agents introduced disinformation theories such as the no plane theory, the space weapon theory, the Judy Wood theories, the nuke theories, all are cognitive infiltration of the real truth. That the towers were brought down with various explosives, sol-gel-nano-Thermite, gelignite, detcord and possibly C4 on the core beams which are easily accessible through the elevator shafts and which had major projects just before 9/11 by a company, now defunct that specializes in demolitions (ACE and Lvi).

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 6

The FBI declassified but highly redacted documents on the "Dancing Israelis" called the Twin Tower event the "TwinBomb" or "TwinBombing," i.e., Twin Tower Bombing.

We are are in deep trouble if the majority of users here think Muslim Arabs who couldn't fly single Cessna engine planes were able to bring down three buildings on 9/11 all demolished.... I mean.... globally "collapsed" at near free-fall speed, into the greatest path of resistance, breaking various laws of physics with two "planes", flying at low altitude well over their VMO limit. It takes someone with no more than two brain cells to rub together to come to the conclusion that the official government sanctioned conspiracy theory is a monstrous myth.

Very odd, indeed, that supposedly all these confessed Jew-wise people here on /r/debatealtright, who claim the ideology of this dissident viewpoint, will not touch 9/11, even though it is by far most obvious false flags atrocity event to ever have been orchestrated on American soil. Firstly, I must conclude that if over 60%+ of Americans believe that 9/11 was an inside job, then these users here claiming the opposite, that Israel nor 5th column neocons were involved, have to be either ignorant, in denial or hasbara shills. I suspect a few of them are crypto-Zionists at heart. I also suspect that there were many disinformation trails manufactured by Zionists on 9/11 to blame certain Zionist factions in a (let it happen on purpose) fashion; a narrative that Jewish Zionist Cass Sunstein would have, and did propagandize after the events to allow for plausible deniability. That is, Establish red-herrings and loose ends on a limited hangout basis. What they want dearly is for skeptics to believe in the "let it happen on purpose" theory, not the "made it happen on purpose" theory.

We can observe some of this perception management in the Jewish made film, Vice, which received its largest funding from an Israeli defense consultant. The film, evidently depicting 9/11 as a Muslim operation, which it wasn't, blames Cheney and Bush for their incompetence for letting Muslims attack the US because they just hated our "freedoms" so much. The Jewish ZioCon (Zionist Trotskysit neoconservatives) embedded in the Bush administration were, in the film, depicted as sane, competent and anti-war. In fact, the neocons, such as the criminal Libby, stated that if "the US intervenes we will cause such a mess in the South West Asia and that this could effectively hurt Israel." The latter is quite hilarious, considering literally all the die-hard neocons and Likudniks, such as Netanyahu, Libby, Frum, Feith, Wolfowitz, Barak, etc., mere hours after the 9/11 false flag event were calling for outright war, a war strategy that paralleled the Yinon Plan but so too American Unipolar military might against growing Multilateralism. In order to set these strategies of global preemptive warfare in motion a pretext would have to be blamed and for the PNACER's, that pretext, as they proposed in their think tank policy papers, would have to be a "catastrophic and catalyzing event... like a New Pearl Harbor."

(Source: Rebuilding America's Defenses document)

So, if a film, such as Vice, created by a Jew and funded by Israeli defense contractors, can depict neoconservatives as sane anti-war activists, have Jewish made films and TV shows, broadcasted before 9/11 ever predicted or gloated about the pretext that was to come?

Well yes! Thousands of shows directed and created by dozens of Israeli Zionist Jews, prominent figures including Arnon Milchan andStan Lee (not his real name) often depict the twin towers being demolished.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_KY6I0OcQU

^ ^ ^ Some of the most obvious depictions in this compilation are created and directed by either Israeli Jews or Zionists. The mathematical over-representation of these depictions which happen to be made by Jews compared to non-Zionists/non-Jews depictions of prominent buildings being demolished/destroyed in a time period of 10 years (from 1991 to 2001) implicates a clear foreknowledge of what was to transpire.

http://bollynbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06//Avi_Arad_Pentagon.jpg

http://bollynbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06//Avi_Arad_WTC.jpg

http://bollynbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06//Avi_Arad_and_Milchan.jpg

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Milchan_cover.JPG

https://bollynbooks.com/israeli-producers-with-prior-knowledge-of-9-11/

https://www.bollyn.com/israeli-prescience-of-9-11-and-the-fraudulent-war-on-terror/

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Medusa_Touch_book_cover.jpg

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Milchan_in_the_middle_2005.JPG

^ ^ ^ "MR. ISRAEL" - Israel's senior LAKAM agent Arnon Milchan (center) has long been the man bridging Israel's intelligence establishment with each new government. In this photo from 2005, Milchan sits between his old friends Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres and Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a former employee of Milchan's chemical company, Milchan Bros. Milchan was the essential agent in building Israel's nuclear arsenal.

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Milchan_and_Peres.JPG

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Making_of_Medusa_Touch.jpg

https://www.bollyn.com/public/the-medusa-touch-poster.jpg

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Lone_Gunmen.JPG

^ ^ ^ The pilot episode of the The Lone Gunmen television series in which a passenger airliner is remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center was filmed in 2000 and aired on television six months before 9/11, on Fox TV in March 2001. The amazingly uncanny similarity of this television show with the events of 9/11 intrigued me and led to my discovery that a senior Israeli intelligence agent named Arnon Milchan was very closely connected with Fox TV, the company that produced the program.

In 2001 Milchan had long been connected to both Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp. and its many subsidiaries, and to Gerald Levin, president and CEO of Time Warner and CNN. The success of the Israeli-produced false-flag terror spectacle was critically dependent on the major news media pushing the official, but unproven, explanation and ignoring the many unanswered questions about what really happened. As the highest-level Israeli intelligence agent in the United States, Milchan certainly seemed to be "Mossad's Man in the Middle", co-ordinating the 9/11 cover up with the two largest news media outlets in the United States.

Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon - Arnon Milchan is a recently published biography of Arnon Milchan (July 2011), the Israeli weapons smuggler/dealer who helped create Israel's nuclear arsenal. Written by the Israeli Meir Doron, a family friend who was raised in Milchan's hometown of Rehovot, and his brother-in-law Joseph Gelman, Confidential is a sympathetic biography written by a couple Zionist Jews, which explains their comparison of Milchan with James Bond in the prologue.

Like most things concerning Israel, how one views Arnon Milchan is all a matter of perspective. A Zionist devoted to the State of Israel may very well see Milchan as a Jewish James Bond while an American like myself is much more likely to view Milchan as one of Ian Fleming's villains, not unlike Ernst Stavro Blofeld (a.k.a. "Number One"), the evil genius with aspirations of world domination as head of the global criminal organization SPECTRE, The Special Executive for Counterintelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion.

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Milchan_Arnon_white.jpg

^ ^ ^ LAKAM'S AGENT NUMBER ONE - Arnon Milchan's illegal smuggling of 810 krytron triggers for an off-the-books nuclear arsenal in the hands of a global criminal organization of Zionist terrorists is something that Ian Fleming's criminal masterminds would have tried to pull off...

There is, of course, a fundamental difference between the James Bond character and Arnon Milchan. Bond (Agent 007) is an agent of the British secret service who is sent on missions to find and neutralize foreign criminal organizations that pose a grave danger to Britain and the West by stealing their nuclear secrets and technology. Arnon Milchan, on the other hand, has long been a master thief and senior agent in such an organization, LAKAM or Mossad II. LAKAM is the very same "rogue outfit" run by Rafael "Dirty Rafi" Eitan in the 1980s that controlled Jonathan J. Pollard, the American Jew who was caught spying for Israel in 1985. Since the 1960s Milchan has been actively engaged in helping Israel create an off-the-books nuclear arsenal, which is at the center of the current instability in the Middle East - and the world.

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Eitan_and_Barak.jpg

^ ^ ^ The Mossad spymaster Rafi Eitan is a senior member of the Israeli Knesset although he is a wanted criminal in the United States. Here Eitan (top) and Ehud Barak, two of the chief suspects of 9/11, sit together in the Knesset, October 2008.

In reading the Milchan biography I found a number of interesting bits of information, which are included in this article with my comments. One of the most interesting things I learned was that Milchan's first big film, in which he invested two million dollars, involved a key scene in which a passenger airliner is flown into a high rise building. The British/French film, The Medusa Touch, was released in 1978. It is worth noting that the Russian Jewish Lord Lew Grade (born Lev Winogradsky) immediately bought the film's foreign rights for $5 million before it was even produced, putting Milchan ahead by a million dollars.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 7

https://www.bollyn.com/public/Greenaway_Medusa_Touch-dj.jpg

The climactic scene of The Medusa Touch (1978) is of a passenger plane being remotely controlled (by mind) and flown into a high rise building.

https://www.bollyn.com/public/The_Medusa_Touch_3.JPG

The Israeli agent Arnon Milchan's first big film simulated a plane crashing into a high rise - in 1978. This happens to have been the same year that the former Mossad chief, Isser Harel, predicted that Arab terrorists would strike New York City's tallest tower. This is no coincidence.

It should be noted that Arnon Milchan is one of Israel's longest serving and most senior intelligence agents, having served the State of Israel since the early 1960s. For Milchan to produce a film that depicts an airliner flying into a high rise in the same year (1978) that the former head of Israeli intelligence predicted an attack by Arab terrorists on the tallest building in New York City is certainly no coincidence. This is when the terrorist Likudniks came to power in Israel and when high level Israeli terrorists began planning 9/11. Milchan's movie was useful in visualizing the false-flag attacks that occurred 23 years later.

The following are a few extracts from Confidential with my comments on the Israeli-written biography of Arnon Milchan.

"Arnon is a special man. It was I who recruited him. Working secretly, from outside the official system, he brought extraordinary ideas and a level of creativity that greatly contributed to our country. When I was at the Ministry of Defense, Arnon was involved in numerous defense-related procurement activities and intelligence operations. His strength is in making connections at the highest levels in countries around the world, including important countries with which Israel does not officially maintain relationships. His activities gave us a huge advantage, strategically, diplomatically and technologically…" - Israeli President Shimon Peres, 8 February 2010

FOX FOREVER

Milchan relocated New Regency from Warner Bros. to Fox in 1998 after News Corp. agreed to make a $200-million equity investment in the company.

On January 14, 2011, New Regency and Fox signed an agreement to extend their distribution relationship through 2022, while at the same time providing a more active role for New Regency involving Fox releases. (p. 259)

Bollyn: Milchan's partnership with Rupert Murdoch and Fox TV began in 1998. Two years later this partnership produced the pilot episode of The Lone Gunmen in which a passenger airliner was hijacked by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center. The program aired on Fox TV in March 2001.

Murdoch's initial $200 million investment in Milchan's company in 1998 is something of a mystery. Why did Murdoch buy into a dodgy company run by an Israeli nuclear criminal? It is, of course, most likely the result of Murdoch simply doing as he is told by the Zionist financiers, e.g. the Rothschilds, who support his Zionist propaganda empire. As the New York Times wrote in July 2011 about Confidential:

In the late 1990s, the News Corporation, which owns Fox, paid $200 million for a 20 percent stake in Mr. Milchan’s Regency Enterprises. A News Corporation spokeswoman, Teri Everett, had no immediate response to a query about the company’s reason for backing Mr. Milchan, and about any reaction by its chief executive, Rupert Murdoch, to revelations in the new book.

RAFI EITAN

Rafi Eitan went on to a successful political career as the head of Israel’s Gil (Pensioners) Party. He served in the Knesset and as special minister without portfolio, advising the prime minister on national security matters. Since the Pollard affair in 1985, Eitan has not been allowed to travel to the United States, where he could be arrested if he did…

LAKAM was officially disbanded as a result of the Pollard affair in 1985. However, it continues to operate worldwide, except in the United States, under a new name. (p. 261)

THE MOST ESSENTIAL AGENT

Israel gained it modern nuclear deterrence capabilities because of the covert efforts of many people, but Milchan was one of the most essential. (p. 262)

BUGGING IRAN

To counter the growing threat, the renamed LAKAM and the Mossad have kicked into high gear. Every known computer system sent to Iran over the past decade has been bugged with monitoring devices. Every possible high-tech system, such as aircraft electronics and spare parts, has been tampered with. (p. 262)

“MR. ISRAEL”

When legendary media mogul Sumner Redstone told us that he considers Milchan to be “Mr. Israel,” he had little idea how accurate his sentiments actually are. If one could imagine a single, indispensable person in the middle who knows where all of the bodies are buried when it comes to Israel’s secret wars, it would be none other than this heavyweight Hollywood producer, who spends his life seamlessly moving between the world of fame and secrecy, fantasy and reality, war and peace. (p. 264)

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 8

"In defense of the world Order, U.S. soldiers would have to kill and die. ... We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood, as well as in words and money."

-- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Back to the Womb, July/August 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs


“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

-- Julius Caesar


“Today, Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true, if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond – whether real or promulgated – that threatened our very existence. It is then that all the peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished with the guarantee of their well-being, granted to them by their world government.”

-- Henry Kissinger, at the Bilderberg Conference in Evians, France, 1991



The So-called NEOCONS


In order to create an internationalist framework you need an institutional framework of people across the globe, people in power with wealth able to wield the global economic system in their localities on behalf of a internationalist government. To be clear, the Rockefeller family are notorious for and admit to calling for a new economic world order. An order that will emergence from a strong BRIC alliance. This multilateral economic world order was conceived back in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, specifically in the Think Tank book, 'Prospects for America.' It is markedly similar to the ideology of duginism.

Presently, this vision has thus far been materialized in the G20+, where it was before just the G7 operating the global agenda, moving from unipolar economic control from a USD global currency reserve to an all inclusive SDR base; thus a multipolar, dedolarized, economic order with the inclusion of other nations, most particularly developing BRIC nations, ie China, India, Brazil, Russia, Iran, etc.

The American plutocracy has been very complicit but they too wish to reap as much as possible while still having a chair of immense power in a USD global currency reserve so they've delayed IMF reforms and thus, the bypass is already underway with the BRICS development bank, an IMF counterpart that will distribute SDRs.

However, the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements, as well as the majority of BRIC countries are becoming tired of U.S nonconservative imperialism, mostly advocated by dual-Israeli Zionists, a large majority of them Jewish. In fact the entire Iraq war and the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ catalyst: the WTC bombings were primarily conceived by 25 neoconservatives, the majority of them Jewish, enthusiastically admitted in an Israeli news report. The movement originated from Irwin Kristol, a communist and trotskyite with anti-Stalinist views.

Many of these government officials are reported to have held dual Israeli-US citizenship¥ during their tenure in Washington, DC. Included in the signatories of the Project for a New American Century is Dick Cheny, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz¥, Peter Rodman, Elliott Abrams¥, Richard Armitage, Robert Zoellick¥, Paula Dobriansky, Richard Perle¥, Eliot A. Cohen¥, Douglas Feith¥, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby¥, Dov Zakheim¥, John Bolten¥, David Wurmser¥, Michael Chertoff¥, Phillip Zellikow¥, Jeb Bush, etc.

http://newsfocus.org/images/pnac/pnac_quote.png

Here are some excerpts from their think tank documents:

“...show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests.”

Of course we remember George H.W Bush calling for a New World Order and the establishment of a "truly United Nations" as authored by the UN's founders. This speech occurred on September 11th 1990, 11 years before September 11th 2001. But Bush and especially his son would be key in shaping the circumstances needed to curtail established American principles and proceed in redirecting US foreign policy.

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

As evidenced from that statement, this was an essential key, critical point that was clearly not lost on this think tank group (Project for a New American Century).

So, extreme doubt was cast as to how fast these aims could be achieved, even under a right-wing administration.

They needed a powerful catalyst that would force Congress and the US public to go along with their treasonous plan for alleged US imperialism and dominance. (More on the "alleged" aspect as you read onward.)

By their own numerous admissions, they needed a new Pearl Harbor.

The UN and its Coinciding Geopolitics


We all know the International Masters of Finance are pulling the strings on this never ending war. My question: WHO or WHAT pulls their strings?

Here we have, in 1998, the V.P. of UNOCAL urging the U.S. Congress to help the United Nations establish an internationally recognized government in Afghanistan so they can lay their oil pipeline. That was nearly four years ago before 2001.

"The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own unique challenges."

"... we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company. "

"A recent study for the World Bank states that the proposed pipeline from Central Asia across Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea would provide more favorable netbacks to oil producers... " [i.e., higher profits for the banksters]

"... cannot begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan government is in place."

"We urge the Administration and the Congress to give strong support to the United Nations-led peace process in Afghanistan."

Source: Read U.S. House of Representatives; 107th Congress, 1st Session; 1998: Testimony By: John J. Maresca; Vice President, International Relations, UNOCAL Corporation To House Committee On International Relations, Subcommittee On Asia And The Pacific February 12, 1998 Washington, D.C.

In it, they covertly called for a war in Afghanistan in order to install a new puppet-leader; create a puppet government that will not impede their plan to glut the area of its vast natural resources... but HOW to start that war? How about terror in the U.S.?

But even if both pipelines were built, they would not have enough total capacity to transport all the oil expected to flow from the region in the future; nor would they have the capability to move it to the right markets. Other export pipelines must be built. This is just one geopolitical agenda of many which has blossomed from the pretext that is 9/11.

The 1992 NEOCON Think Tank DPG Documents


Now for the 1992 DPG neoconservative plan, which called for:

  • Huge increase in US defense spending.

  • Assertion of US lone superpower status.

  • Discourage industrial nations from challenging the US.

  • Maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors

  • Prevent emergence of regional competitors and new rivals.

  • Adopt the use of preemptive force - unprovoked warfare.

  • US should forsake multilateralism and act independently to get its own way.

  • Ability to handle two major regional contingencies at once. (SW Asia & Korea)

  • Foreign intervention in global disputes, even if not directly related to US interests.

  • Make Milstar (Military Strategic and Tactical Relay) satellite communications network top priority.

  • Show the leadership necessary to establish and protect "a new order."

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 9

The 1994 New Citizenship Project


In 1994, a new non-profit organization, the 'New Citizenship Project' was formed, with political commentator William (Bill) Kristol as chairman and Gary J. Schmitt as president. It was largely funded by many private neoconservative donors and right-wing foundations as well as democrat war-hawks. Their mission statement...

"An organization created to promote greater civic participation in our national life."

1996 and Neocon Treachery


When it comes to neocon treachery, 1996 was indeed a very big year, because these same neoconservatives decided to get busy. Very busy.

They formed the US Committee to Expand NATO, which later became the US Committee on NATO.)

Neoconservatives Bill Kristol and Donald Kagan co-authored a piece called "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy," another cornerstone in their plan for complete control of US policy.

Also in 1996, another dark document was conceived and written for the IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (Israeli company), with dire implications for the middle east. It was entitled "A Clean Break - A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," penned by neocon co-authors David Wurmser and Richard Perle. It formed the basis for the middle east wars which would take place post-9/11.

Most have given credit to Douglas Feith, but he now denies being a "main" contributor, although admits to be consulted on the paper before its publication.

http://newsfocus.org/images/pnac/pnac_perle_wurmser_feith.png

1997 and The Project for a New American Century


In 1997, the Project for a New American Century was finally born, the PNAC. Spawned from the skewed right-wing brain-trust of neocons who are really fascist neotrotskyites; William Kristol and Robert Kagan, their sole purpose was to form a new US policy... one that was overly aggressive and self aggrandizing, espousing the US as supreme over all. (In reality, the "supreme US" is all a ruse, which will be explained further on.)

http://newsfocus.org/images/pnac/kristol_kagan.png

In its founding statement of principles, just like the DPG draft, the PNAC statement called for U.S. global leadership and preemptive action, stating:

"Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership."

The evidence of a clear effort to take down the US becomes even more transparent just a year later in October of '98, when yet another dark document was conceived, called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy."

1998, Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy


"Catastrophic Terrorism"... as a National Policy?

Seriously?

Well, that's exactly what the public and other government watchdogs were asking back then as well, and so guess what? All of a sudden - magically, overnight - that document suddenly had a new name... Catastrophic Terrorism: "Tackling the New Danger."

So, using our 20/20 hindsight once again, was that earlier title all just some form of eerie prescience, or was it an actual revealing preview of their true intended plans for this country?

Thinking minds shouldn't have to parse that one about for too long.

Then there was the issue of the little subtitle in the document...

"Imagining the 'transformative event.'"

There are two key components to that title... the act of "imagining," as well as the "transformative event," the latter of which is actually two more things unto itself - something "transformative," and in the form of an "event."

Perhaps the only title more telling about its authors might have been "Daydreaming about the transformative event."

A very telling admission/concession of guilt came in the form of a later revision which shamelessly changed the subtitle to its present version, "Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century."

Although, even that small revision reveals much about this group and its plans, because it blatantly spells out in its revised title, a new type of US governance is being implied.

A Policy Coup


This new policy proposal was the byproduct of yet another tiny micro-group of neoconservative men; Zionist gentile, Ashton B. Carter; Russian Zionist Jew, John Deutch, and Philip Zellikow, Jewish Zionist. At the time, only John Deutch was publicly well known as the former Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994-95, and Director of the CIA from 1995-96. Deutch also served on the boards of directors of Citigroup, Cummins, Raytheon, and Schlumberger Ltd. Deutch is also a member of the Trilateral Commission.

Let us see what the Jewish press says themselves about Zionists / Jews with Dual-Israeli citizenship occupying the U.S. Government.

From Jewish Week, July 21, 1995:

JEWISH APPOINTEES AT WHITE HOUSE [headline] An administration that already seems to be setting records for the number of Jews in high-level positions has added several more.

Lee Fisher, the former attorney general of Ohio, is President Clinton's choice as head of the National Commission on Crime Control and Prevention... [the article tells us that Fisher is: a Cleveland lawyer, played a major role in setting up hate crimes statues in Ohio; known for his effort to create partnerships between law enforcement and citizens groups; leading advocate of handgun control]

... Cheryl Halpern, to the broadcasting board of governors of the International Bureau of Broadcasting. [Halpern: was president of the Natl. Jewish Coalition; served on the executive board of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, [couldn't that be considered a conflict of interest?]the Executive Committee of the N. J. Regional Advisory Board of the A.D.L. and the Metrowest Jewish Federation] Gentiles did not scream HATE CRIMES or Discrimination! Only "special persons" do that. The Jewish Forward '95 carried an article about Jew, John Deutch's appointment as head of CIA.

As soon as he was confirmed, Deutch promptly dismissed all experienced high-ranking gentile CIA officials and replaced them with a new, all-Jewish staff: George Tenet, to CIA Deputy Director; David Cohen to Dir. Of Operations and Nora Slatkin to Executive Director... third in command of the Agency.

The Forward says that Deutch and his family are holocaust survivors. His mother was the daughter of the famous Zionist, Jean Fischer, whose family were wealthy diamond merchants in Belgium. This fact connects the wealthy Deutch family both to the Zionist state of Israel and to the international Jewish diamond and banking cartel, which has a long history of fraud and third world exploitation

In February 2000, CBS-60 Minutes, aired a program about a former employee (a Jew) who was suing the CIA, alleging that he had been terminated from the CIA – singled out -- because he was a Jew. This was a common occurrence in the 40's through 60's but not too common in the present day. As a result of that pernicious performance, the ADL has now become an arm of the U.S. Government – a "watch dog" appointed to "observe and direct" the hiring/firing policies of (allegedly) OUR U.S. CIA!

Do you understand just how far the infiltration and control of OUR government has gone and is there ANY doubt that what is in place now is a Zionist Occupied Government,. Look at congress and their applaud when Benjamin Netanyahu speaks. It is a circus. And yet saying this will get you the anti-Semitic canard.

Also from Peter Kawaja's "THE SADDEST CHAPTER OF AMERICAS HISTORY" on John Deutch, a "special person" who like Bush, took control of "our," already corrupt CIA :

John Deutch now CIA Director - formerly Chemistry Professor at MIT & on the Defense Science Board which issued a secret report in 1980 urging US production of "binary" weapons.

The New York Times reported in July 1995 that on his appointment, Deutch "moved quickly to change things, Frederick Hitz [Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency] was the only senior official who kept his job." He essentially gutted the CIA of so called realist conservatives.

Furthermore, Phillip Zellikow would "coincidentally" be later named as the head of the 9/11 Commission, while Ashton B. Carter would later become Secretary of Defense.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 10

Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy Continued...


The thing most damning about the Catastrophic Terrorism (CT) study was their joint speculation on what would have happened had the 1993 World Trade Center bombing brought down the twin towers...

"Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force."

The proposal then suggests:

"More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks."

These members of the CT study also wrote:

"Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible."

"Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a before and after."

"Using imagination, we hope now to find some of the political will that we know would be there later, "after," because this nation prefers prevention to funereal reconstruction. When this threat becomes clear the President must be in a position to activate extraordinary capabilities."

This isn't a proposal as much as it is a full out plan... neocon daydreaming on how to take down the United States.

Conclusion


When it comes to the numerous repeated references to "Pearl Harbor," it was all very deliberate. It was literally an elaborate mass conditioning scheme, to get people to once again accept the "great lie," as they did leading to WWII.

As coincidence would have it... conspicuously enough, the $450-million dollar movie blockbuster "Pearl Harbor" was also released early that year, in May of 2001, settling the horror of Dec 7, 1941 back into the public consciousness.

Add to that, this disturbing account. According to author Barbara Honegger, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had given out literally hundreds of copies of Pearl Harbor; Warning and Decision that year, written by Rand employee Roberta Wohlstetter. It was also reported to be required reading for Rumsfeld's personal aides.

With a multi-trillion dollar War on Terror looming on the horizon, this was not a coincidence.

The PNAC set the stage and then they played it for all its worth. This group was literally the poster-child for all things non-Constitutional mayhem post 9/11, most especially the run-up to the Iraq War.

Preceding the war, key PNAC members such as Paul Wolfowitz (later the head of the World Bank!!!) and Richard Perle beat the drum for war with Iraq as did Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel hard-line Likud party members. According the Vanderbilt Television Archives, Wolfowitz was on 180 times to sell the war while Perle was on 187.

They were programming the American public to not only accept their ruse, but then act upon it using classical conditioning methods.

And as history shows, it seems to have worked pretty damn well.

Each of these PNAC proposals were essential pieces to the overall master plan, the takeover and dissolution of the United States, the latter of which is totally contrary to their stated principles, but as many have already figured out, the inevitable outcome of this has already been deviously engineered into the deployment of their aggressive plan, in the form of blowback and retaliation from those oppressed and infuriated by the plans eventual overall execution. Perhaps most telling of all, the PNAC website (www.NewAmericanCentury.org) and the POTD website (www.PTdemocracy.org) have both been removed from the internet.

What's the old saying about having nothing to hide?

Long story short folks, if you haven't figured it out by now, this was an illegal coup on the United States of America. Period. End of discussion.

According to Michelle Ciarrocca and William D. Hartung's book, "Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival," World Policy Institute Special Report, July 2002...

"When Zakheim left the Defense Department in 1987, it was for an executive vice president post with the Virginia-based government contractor Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), which has supplied the Defense Department with military technology such as remote controlled flight technology for several decades and has been a support contractor for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Zakheim also served as CEO at subsidiary SPC International and as a consultant for the defense contractors McDonnell Douglas (now a part of Boeing) and Northrop Grumman."

When it comes to the US neoconservative movement, there appears to be dirt from 9/11, no matter where you turn, yet, this is but only the tip of the iceberg.

Everyone gets the blame post 9/11, except for the neocons, Zionists and their US and Israeli supporters who planned it all. For added measure, these neocons were center stage on the spotlight of leftist and right leaning news agencies. They are paraded on live television as if they are saviors or idols we should look up to.

The fact that the mainstream corporate media has said virtually nothing about this infiltration of the US government by a private neoconservative group of individuals, with foreign ties to another government, that is quite telling in itself.

It tends to substantiate and corroborate allegations that the media is a disinformation and propaganda conduit of the government, supported by the ultra-wealthy powers that be.

Another point of contention is the fact that this secretive group is also a key sister organization to another covert group, the Israeli organization known as IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. (Responsible for Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.)

The two plans together, Rebuilding America's Defenses, and A Clean Break, both dovetail together as one plan, with a singular agenda and objective.

One could rightfully suggest that there may be more than just these two uncovered plans in play. There very well could conceivably be at least two more plans, covering both the EU and Asia, but they have yet to surface in the public domain.

I've said it many times over and I will keep repeating it every chance I get...

The Taliban did not create the IASPS or the PNAC.

Al Qaeda didn't draft the "Clean Break" document, nor the 1992 DPG, or the 2000 "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document.

Isis is not the one changing US law or restricting your Constitutional rights.

Our politicians did all of this to you... to all of us... and yet they themselves are but minions to the powers that be (TPTB), puppets to the uber-rich marionettes who rule this world with indifference for all but themselves.

Allegedly... these neoconservative Israel hard-liner idealists did it all so that they could perpetuate their plan for US supremacy through the "New American Century," but in all reality, it's about the demise of the US, for a one-world globalist rule.

That may be hard to accept, or even fathom for some, but one only needs to look at what's happened to the US post 9/11 as a result of their covert national policy changes.

This is why many of the internationalists see fit to turn to a multilateral economic order with the possible exclusion of the U.S.

The system at its present has been in development for more then three centuries now, its formations can be seen in action in the late 1600s in Amsterdam which was a former financial power house for Jewish bankers in the past which aided in the removal of the Roman Catholic's influence in England (King James) with William of Orange, (ref. The Glorious Revolution).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution

Many people hate on the world government for their engineering of economies and people, but what these people have done has been a manufactured progression towards what they believe to be a stable, economically egalitarian redistribution whose aim is a better quality of life for people, so they say, and a state counter intuitive to the human animal because tribal feudalism is that state and its manifestations occur in things such as Financial Faux-Capitalism, where we have a short rebuff too, as to why we have democratic socialism with the plugin for capitalist markets. The New Economic World Order might look good on paper, it might even work, yet we've seen for many years its infiltration and the bad people that surround it. It could be hailed as the savior of poverty and war, the antidote in fact, or just another form of totalitarian control run by technocrats, theocrats and the Zionist Cabal.

And let us now look at what a prominent German Jewish neocon has to say about this New Order....

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 11

Alexander H. Joffe, a pro-Israel academic, has been a featured writer in the pages of this JINSA publication, and that he was given so much space to tout his theories certainly reflects the high regard in which his views are held.

According to Michael Collins Piper. quoted from his book until further notice:

In his essay, Joffee frankly admitted that “America is an empire” and asserts that, yes, this is a very good thing. Joffe says that when the UN dared to take on Zionism, that marked the demise of the UN in the minds of the internationalists.

Joffe writes:

“The end of the General Assembly as a credible body may plausibly be ascribed to the infamous ‘Zionism is Racism’ resolution in 1975.” The JINSA author contends that the world should be “grateful” that the UN has been “discredited, reduced to farce and ultimately ground to a halt,” referring, of course, to UN positions that the Zionists and their allies in the world empire movement find offensive.

As a result of the UN being shelved as a world government vehicle, writes Joffe, “We now have the opportunity, and obligation, to begin again.” However, he warns that the emerging European Union (EU) is a threat to the dream of a global empire.

The JINSA writer asserts that the EU is an:

“alternative vision for the international community,” one that, as he puts it, frankly is “the authentic countervision to an American Empire.”

According to the Zionist writer, the biggest problem with Europe and the EU is that:

“culture remains at the core of Europe’s problems. Nationalism was a doctrine born in Europe, as were its vicious mutant offspring: fascism and communism.”

(Note: A fervent advocate of Israeli super-nationalism, the writer, Joffe, doesn’t seem to see the lack of logic in his attack on other peoples’ nationalism—but then, again, honesty has never been integral to the hard- line Zionist point of view.)

Joffe complains that although “the new European Empire is multi- cultural in theory . . . in reality it is dominated politically and culturally by France and economically by Germany.”

Today, in the EU, he says:

“driven by a sense of postcolonial guilt and postwar ennui the door have been thrown open to all ideas. At the most sinister levels it has permitted and even legitimized a vast explosion of unhinged thought and action, namely anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, and a wide variety of conspir- acy theories.”

(The so-called “conspiracy theories” that so alarm this Zionist theo- retician are those that dare to challenge the “official” views of what real- ly happened on September 11, 2001. He is inflamed that millions of peo- ple in Europe and the Muslim world—not to mention the United States—have raised questions about Israeli foreknowledge and/or involvement in those events.)

In any case, what Joffe describes as:

“the other kind of liberal internationalism”

...is what the Zionist movement favors and Joffe defines it:

The American Empire has no real or theoretical competitors. The goal of the American Empire in the 21st century is not territorial control or the exploitation of resources but political and economic leadership which defends and advances American interests, and which promotes the development and well being of all nations. Given our history and our values, that future lies in leveraging the American Empire in such a way that it becomes the basis of a new democratic international system.

Ultimately the only answer for a stable and prosperous planet will be a glob- al system that is structurally and morally similar to the American union—semi- autonomous states with secular, liberal democratic systems; where states have both prescribed rights and agreed upon responsibilities in a larger secular, liberal dem- ocratic framework; one equipped with checks and balances and meaningful insti- tutions; with governance based on rule of law and tolerant and pluralist values. In the second-part of his extended essay, published in the Winter 2004 issue of JINSA’s journal, Joffe pursued this line of thought further, expanding on his call for what he described as “an empire that looks like America.” 138

Amazingly, Joffe frankly talks about the United States engaging in massive imperial conquests in the trouble-torn regions of Africa—pre- sumably after the United States has already made havoc in the Arab coun- tries of the Middle East:

The conditions under which America and its allies would simply take over and restore African countries are far from clear. What are the thresholds for inter- vention? What are the procedures and outcomes? Who will fight and who will pay? The restoration of Africa would involve long-term commitments and immense costs, of the sort that could only be paid for by Africa itself. That is to say, it would probably require American economic control, to go along with political and cultural control. Colonialism is always pay as you go, and it is not pretty. The question is both whether Africa can pay the price (or afford not to) and whether America has the stomach.

Of course, Africa is not the only target of Joffe and his like-minded schemers (and that is precisely what they are, however, “extreme” that term may be perceived). In fact, Joffe talks of a wide-ranging global agenda—well beyond the African continent.

In the end, however, Joffe lets the cat out of the bag, about the real intentions of those who are using United States military power as the mechanism for a bigger agenda.

“New arrangements,” he says, “must come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.”

Joffe dreams of a United Nations that has been re-made under the imperial force of the United States. And ultimately, he predicts the possibility of a world government, writing:

Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. [Note his use of the term “bludgeoned.”—MCP]

Rather than a club that admits all, the 21st century United Nations might— someday, somehow—be remade into an exclusive, by invitation, members-only group, of free, democratic states, sharing similar values. Or in the end, replaced by one. That day, however, may be decades off.

Should there be any doubt that he is talking about world government, note Joffe’s concluding words:

The best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually give it up.

Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leader- ship and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here.

So it is. Despite all the high-sounding rhetoric about “democracy,” what it all comes down to—in the words of this pro-Israel ideologue—is the use of America’s military power to advance another (secret) agenda altogether. Even many of those grass-roots American flag-wavers (who may be genuine patriots) who relish the concept of an American empire may find Joffe’s concepts somewhat different from what they otherwise might perceive.

But here, in the pages of a devotedly pro-Zionist journal, we learn precisely what the “story behind the story” actually happens to be. It has nothing to do, really, even with a “strong America” or, for that matter, even with America itself.

The United States of America is simply a pawn—albeit a powerful one—in the game, being ruthlessly shifted about in a scheme for world dominance by an elite few operating behind the scenes. And, in the end, this does tell us very much about who The High Priests of War really are and what their agenda is really all about. There’s no mystery at all.

What remains to be determined is what the American people—and all other real patriots in nations around the globe—intend to do about it. The question is this: will the world finally decide it is time to declare war on The High Priests of War?

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 12

Best documentary on 9/11- 'September 11th New Pearl Harbor' created by Massimo Mazzuco, an Italian filmaker:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFH06hXxRWc

http://www.investigate911.org/World-Trade-Center-WTC-Tower-destroyed-Thermate-Superthermite-Nano-thermite-explosives-evidencing-911-was-an-inside-job-using-controlled-demolitions.jpg

^ ^ ^ Does this look like a gravitational collapse, this is excluding dustified bone that could only be done by explosives and impossible lateral speeds of steal beams hitting other towers blocks away that could not account for mere gravitational collapse, which ZIoCon controlled NIST never even investigated for they said collapse was inevitable, lol.

Does this look like a gravitational collapse or a demolition? Clearly a demolition:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZvXn02V4m8

^ ^ ^ Pictured above is our World Trade Center Tower being destroyed by continuous explosions using Superthermite (Nano-thermite) explosives in a controlled demolition and possibly detcord, gelignite and c4. Sol-gel Nano-thermites are categorized as energetic nanocomposites. As reported in the New York Times, hundreds of 9/11 first responder’s witness continuous explosions, thereby corroborating that controlled demolitions were used to completely demolish the WTC Towers. Some people were event killed or inured in the b-4 level of the towers well after the planes hit the facade. Indicating cutter charges at the base of the core columns.

http://www.investigate911.org/Mandarin-Oriental-Hotel-High-rise-Beijing-China-burned-fires-six-hours-2-9-2009-building-did-not-collapse-cctv.jpg

^ ^ ^ Did not collapse, not even partially.

http://www.investigate911.org/Building-Damage-by-Earthquakes.jpg

^ ^ ^ At no time in history has any building ever completely disintegrated without the use of explosives. The buildings above were all damaged by earthquakes. Three WTC Towers were completely demolished on 9/11. Why is our government telling us that these demolitions were caused by spontaneous collapse, primarily due to fire, after finding incontrovertible evidence of military high explosives?

Physics Journal Publishes Hard Peer-reviewed Evidence of WTC Explosives... Twenty-five Military Officers Call Official 9/11 story "Impossible", "Ludicrous", "A well-organized cover-up", investigate 911 now... Majority of 9/11 Commissioners Now Say Government Lied... 2,000+ Architects & Engineers "calling for a Grand Jury investigation of NIST officials"...

http://www.investigate911.org/Red-Thermite-Chips-Superthermite-Super-Nano-Thermate-Thermitic-Jones-Dust-911-World-Trade-Center-WTC-investigate911-org-Nano-Thermite.jpg

^ ^ ^ Scientists find Nano-thermite explosives (estimated at over 10-tons) at the World Trade Center catastrophe. Some debunkers like to claim these are just iron spheres from the fires, this is a lie, as multiple scientists were able to ignite these nano-thermite chips which had high explosive potential. Detcord, blasting gel, i.e., gelignite, and c4 were also used.

Nano-thermite explosives shown above were gathered from the WTC debris shortly after the towers fell on 9/11. Brigham Young University Physics Professor, Dr. Steven Jones, discovered the explosives and joined an international team of nine scientists for further analysis. Through extensive laboratory testing, the scientists concluded that the samples were Nano-thermitic explosives. After a rigorous peer-review process, their paper was published in the Bentham Chemical Physics Journal, which has been endorsed by Nobel Laureates and is respected within the scientific community.

http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/2010/09/911-truth-evidence-of-energetic.html

https://www.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html

http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 13

**

The paper's first author is Dr. Niels Harrit, a 37-year Professor of Chemistry at Copenhagen University in Denmark and an expert in Nano-chemistry, who says, "The official account put forth by NIST violates the fundamental laws of physics."

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS204116+09-Sep-2010+PRN20100909

Government and independent evidence corroborates Thermitic explosives used to bring down all three WTC Towers on 9/11.

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1165/508OF05-1165.html

http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/WTC/130%20Liberty%20Street/Mike%20Davis%20LMDC%20130%20Liberty%20Documents/Signature%20of%20WTC%20dust/WTC%20Dust%20Signature.Composition%20and%20Morphology.Final.pdf

http://wtc.nist.gov/media/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf

http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf

http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4

http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AE911Truth-NIST-Written-Submission12-18-07.pdf

Over two thousand architects, engineers, academics, and high-ranking military officers, as well as hundreds of 9/11 firemen, survivors, and family members have challenged the government's conspiracy theory. Twenty-five military officers call the official 9/11 story, "Impossible", "Ludicrous", "A well-organized cover-up". Forty-one U.S. counter-terrorism and intelligence agency veterans challenge the official 9/11 account, calling it, "terribly flawed", "laced with contradictions", "a joke", "a cover-up".

The majority of 9/11 Commissioners now say that the government lied about 9/11, including its Chairman, Thomas Kean (Republican), Vice Chairman, Lee Hamilton (Democrat), and its Senior Legal Counsel, John Farmer, who states, "there was an agreement not to tell the truth."

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september112009/911_truth_9-11-09.php

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

According to a scientific poll by New York Times & CBS News, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11, while 81% think it is hiding something or mostly lying. CNN poll shows that 89% believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11.

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7210/americans_question_bush_on_9_11_intelligence/

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/14340.exclude.html

But according to this alt-right sub, supposedly Jew-wise, the majority believe the government sanctioned narrative. Quite laughable.

http://investigate911.org/Iron-Rich-Molten-Micro-Spheres-Thermate-Thermite-Signature-Evidence-Jones-Dust-911-World-Trade-Center-WTC.jpg

^ ^ ^ Shown above, is more of the "Smoking Gun" evidence, which is based on using Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Fluorescence, and Electron Microprobe analyses on residue from ground zero, which indicates the incriminating chemical profile or "signature" of Thermate, which as mentioned is Thermite plus sulfur to increase cutting efficiency by chemically reducing the melting point of steel.

http://www.investigate911.org/Raymond-McGovern-Chairman-National-Intelligence-Estimates-CIA-Presidents-Daily-Brief-for-Ronald-Reagan-George-Bush-911-orchestrated-by-this-administration.jpg

^ ^ ^ Raymond L. McGovern, Chairman of National Intelligence Estimates, 27-year CIA Veteran says:

"The 9/11 report is a joke."

Seismic Signals Reveal Explosives Were Used at the WTC on 9/11

Seismic Signals Reveal Explosives Were Used at the WTC on 9/11, according to geophysicist André Rousseau. Doctor André Rousseau, former researcher in geophysics at CNRS and specialist in sound waves, presents us with the results of his analysis of the seismic signals recorded on September 11, 2001 in New York and gives his point of view as a specialist on the question of the destruction of the three towers at the World Trade Center.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/209899-A-New-Study-of-the-Seismic-Signals-on-September-11-2001-in-New-York

http://www.investigate911.org/Architect-Richard-Gage-lays-out-all-the-evidence-for-the-controlled-demolition-of-the-3-WTC-high-rises-on-911-in-an-interview-on-Vancouvers-Omni-TV-April-22-2008.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/Woman-in-WTC-Tower-hole-made-by-jet-is-not-filled-with-fire-or-hot.jpg

^ ^ ^ Shortly after the jet hit the North WTC Tower, Edna Cintron, pictured above, was waving from its hole, indicating that its opening was not particularly hot. How could the fires be hot enough to melt steel, but cool enough for Edna?

http://www.investigate911.org/Government-corroboration-of-Thermate-used-in-a-controlled-demolition-to-destroy-the-WTC-Towers.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/Fires-burned-and-molten-steel-flowed-in-the-pile-of-ruins-still-settling-beneath-my-feet-Sarah-Atlas-Task-Force-One-Urban-Search-and-Rescue-911-WTC.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/WTC-7-Steel-from-the-911-Memorial-International-Peace-Garden-ND-Manitoba-office-fires-do-not-do-this-to-steel-but-Thermate-and-Thermite-do-produce-molten-steel.jpg

As shown above, fire does not do this to steel; however, Thermate does. The byproduct of Thermate is molten iron--as witnessed by numerous NYFD personnel and many others. Leslie Robertson, Structural Engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, was quoted at the National Conference of Structural Engineers on October 5, 2001, "As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning, and molten steel was still running."

Thermate is known by criminal investigators as a "smoking gun" when found in the aftermath of fires as it is used as an incendiary by arsonists. Testing for Thermite is specified in fire and explosion investigations by the NFPA 921 code. Why is our government refusing to test World Trade Center dust for explosives?

http://investigate911.org/Government-thermal-image-hot-spots-corroborate-chemical-testing-of-Thermate-and-witness-testimony-of-molten-metal-found-under-WTC-Towers.jpg

Government images above indicate "ground zero" surface temperatures exceeding 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit, which were recorded five days after 9/11. These thermal photographs only indicate surface temperatures, not the higher temperatures witnessed deeper under the rubble. Once again, this high temperature phenomenon is only witnessed after controlled demolitions using Thermate (or its equivalent) to melt through structural steel support beams.

http://www.investigate911.org/Numerous-witnesses-corroborate-multiple-scientific-tests-indicating-tons-of-molten-metal-within-the-aftermath-of-all-three-WTC-Towers-destroyed-with-Superthermite-explosives.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/NY-Firemen-witness-molten-metal-flowing-like-lava-under-WTC-Towers-thereby-corroborating-that-911-was-an-inside-job.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/Almost-six-weeks-after-911-molten-metal-was-dripping-from-heavy-equipment-as-WTC-debris-was-being-picked-up-from-ground-zero.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/Numerous-multi-ton-meteorites-of-cooled-molten-metal-found-at-911-WTC-by-Bart-Voorsanger.jpg

It is scientifically implausible for jet fuel, which is basically kerosene, or a building fire to melt steel. The only time you find evidence of molten iron, as seen above, is after a controlled demolition using Thermate or its equivalent.

The “open air burning” temperature of jet fuel is 549.5 degrees Fahrenheit.

http://www.investigate911.org/Previously-molten-metal-samples-clinging-to-911-WTC-steel-from-the-monument.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/RJ-LeeGroup-WTC-Dust-Signature-Report-Vesicular-Alumino-Silicate-particale.jpg

Pictured above, is additional corroborating evidence from a scientific study by the RJ Leegroup, which shows a vesicular alumino-silicate particle found in WTC dust, described in their "Expert Report: WTC Dust Signature" dated May 2004, as a "round open porous structure having a Swiss cheese appearance as a result of boiling and evaporation." If indeed such an alumino-silicate particle sustained sufficient temperatures to "boil", this event would indicate temperatures within the WTC destruction of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit, which is completely out of the range of the maximum temperature of 1,832 degrees Fahrenheit, determined for the WTC fires using the NIST analysis. However, this evidence is consistent with and strongly suggests the use of Thermite based explosives in the pulverization of WTC Towers during the 9/11 controlled demolitions.

http://www.investigate911.org/FEMA-government-report-high-temperature-corrosion-attack-steel-hard-evidence-Thermate-explosive-Superthermite-Nano-thermite-controlled-demolition-WTC-Towers-WTC-7.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/Partially-reacted-red-thermite-chips-found-in-WTC-dust-samples-provide-strong-evidence-that-Super-thermite-aka-Nano-thermite-generated-the-iron-rich-spheres.jpg

http://www.investigate911.org/Smoking-gun-evidence-of-Thermate-found-in-the-dust-of-WTC-demolitions.jpg

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, not really. The offica lstory is that it fell due to thermal expansion, a new phenenom, that makes zero sense and they also falsified their input data. The shills will say it fell due to falling debris from demolished towers but even NIST could not admit this because they had indepedent scientists fact checking their work at arcitechs and engineers for 9/11 truth.

Also, why would you need a remote control when there are billions of hajis ready and willing to die flying it. Hajis are cheaper than modified airliners.

Why would a 5th Column within the US rely on a bunch of patsies to fly these large planes when they couldn't even fly single cessna engines? Their only job, with their mossad handlers in Hollywood FL, was to create the needed backstory. That's it.

I have talekd to several pilots and the all said they couldn't fly the way these planes did, and niether could their planes at that speed close to sea level. What is clear is that they flew nearly exactly their VMO and were most likely reinforced passenger jets with remote guided systems flown into beacons. The passenger lists are VERY perculiar, and resemble that of the Operation Northwoods operation. They two planes that hit the towers came from the first privitzed US airport in 2000, Stewart Airport which was pushed by Lauder and a bunch of Zionists.

[–]prankmyballs 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

NOFX are such cringe faggots. I can't believe I once thought they were funny

Fathomo Mike's daughter is going to grow up a freak with that loser as her dad

[–]Entropick 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

same, same

[–]goobandit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really disappointed in how fat mike stays quiet on the corporate sponsorship of the “resistance.” His DIY lifestyle really inspired me as a kid, but watching the weekend at Fatty’s show made me sad for him. He did not look happy.

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lots of musicians are doing this. See this segment of James Corbett's New World Next Week.

[–]fred_red_beans 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jello has turned out to be just another conformist

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxv8QvGLAes&t=123s

[–]prankmyballs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I saw one of Jello's spoken words and at the end he was begging for money to help his court case against the rest of the Dead Kennedys after he stopped paying them royalties.

I didn't hear that part because the fucker went on for hours and I had better shit to do

He lost the case, which is probably a good thing. Now both he and the band can suck separately

[–]One_Jack_Move 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah, remember when NOFX used to make sense:

You think I give a shit

If you're a socialist

If you're a capitalist

We've all got to exist

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't take Biafra's word for what's best after his legal trouble with the rest of the band.